We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is probate necessary?
Options
Comments
-
scaredm said:Brie said:scaredm said:Thank you so much.
But, gosh, this is so complicated to a complete novice. When you say "advertise for any creditors" what does this mean exactly in layman's terms?
One thing that might suggest a solicitor is a good idea is the potential issue with the other sibling. Is he likely to try to contest the Will or make things difficult? If so, you might want to involve a solicitor at some point so you don’t have to personally deal with that son.
Otherwise is isn’t as daunting a task as it might sound, honestly. Once you start it starts to get clearer. Have a look at the forms. It sounds like mother left good records which is really helpful. I never bothered with advertising for creditors as I knew the finances and was as certain as possible that there were none.2 -
poppystar said:scaredm said:Brie said:scaredm said:Thank you so much.
But, gosh, this is so complicated to a complete novice. When you say "advertise for any creditors" what does this mean exactly in layman's terms?
One thing that might suggest a solicitor is a good idea is the potential issue with the other sibling. Is he likely to try to contest the Will or make things difficult? If so, you might want to involve a solicitor at some point so you don’t have to personally deal with that son.
Otherwise is isn’t as daunting a task as it might sound, honestly. Once you start it starts to get clearer. Have a look at the forms. It sounds like mother left good records which is really helpful. I never bothered with advertising for creditors as I knew the finances and was as certain as possible that there were none.0 -
It definitely isn't as daunting as it sounds - "officially" you are supposed to advertise in the gazette and paper for creditors as this absolves the executor HOWEVER the beneficiaries would still be liable if someone turned up a a later date. I was sole exec and beneficiary so made no difference and I didn't advertise. Solicitors always do - it delays the process and adds to the costs but they don't know the deceased finances and can't take the risk.
In most cases it is unlikely that there are creditors - maybe the odd newsagents bill, etc etc but likely to be minimal
I would do the probate (seriously loads of us on here hadn't a clue and managed with help and hints from otehrs) and then you will need a solicitor to handle the sale of the property.
PS good point above about the other sibling, is he likely to turn up wanting his share?1 -
scaredm said:poppystar said:scaredm said:Brie said:scaredm said:Thank you so much.
But, gosh, this is so complicated to a complete novice. When you say "advertise for any creditors" what does this mean exactly in layman's terms?
One thing that might suggest a solicitor is a good idea is the potential issue with the other sibling. Is he likely to try to contest the Will or make things difficult? If so, you might want to involve a solicitor at some point so you don’t have to personally deal with that son.
Otherwise is isn’t as daunting a task as it might sound, honestly. Once you start it starts to get clearer. Have a look at the forms. It sounds like mother left good records which is really helpful. I never bothered with advertising for creditors as I knew the finances and was as certain as possible that there were none.1 -
poppystar said:scaredm said:poppystar said:scaredm said:Brie said:scaredm said:Thank you so much.
But, gosh, this is so complicated to a complete novice. When you say "advertise for any creditors" what does this mean exactly in layman's terms?
One thing that might suggest a solicitor is a good idea is the potential issue with the other sibling. Is he likely to try to contest the Will or make things difficult? If so, you might want to involve a solicitor at some point so you don’t have to personally deal with that son.
Otherwise is isn’t as daunting a task as it might sound, honestly. Once you start it starts to get clearer. Have a look at the forms. It sounds like mother left good records which is really helpful. I never bothered with advertising for creditors as I knew the finances and was as certain as possible that there were none.
The brother is a real bad'n. Long history of lies, deception, theft. MIL was originally talked into leaving it 3-ways by her solicitor as she was told none of the siblings could then contest. When the solicitor went to her house a year ago with the paperwork, MIL apparently was adamant that the eldest sibling was crossed out. The solicitor asked her carer to witness and the rest is history. If a deed of variation was drawn up, it would only be to prevent further trouble down the line. There is certainly no love lost.0 -
I agree - curious it wasn't a new will or codicil. How difficult for you all. Sounds like brother didn't expect any - has he been involved at all?0
-
Flugelhorn said:I agree - curious it wasn't a new will or codicil. How difficult for you all. Sounds like brother didn't expect any - has he been involved at all?1
-
scaredm said:Flugelhorn said:I agree - curious it wasn't a new will or codicil. How difficult for you all. Sounds like brother didn't expect any - has he been involved at all?
There's no legal requirement to tell someone they're NOT a beneficiary. How could there be, if you think about it.
So it's a judgement call.
Is he aware of the death?How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)1 -
Flugelhorn said:It definitely isn't as daunting as it sounds - "officially" you are supposed to advertise in the gazette and paper for creditors as this absolves the executor HOWEVER the beneficiaries would still be liable if someone turned up a a later date. I was sole exec and beneficiary so made no difference and I didn't advertise. Solicitors always do - it delays the process and adds to the costs but they don't know the deceased finances and can't take the risk.1
-
Sea_Shell said:scaredm said:Flugelhorn said:I agree - curious it wasn't a new will or codicil. How difficult for you all. Sounds like brother didn't expect any - has he been involved at all?
There's no legal requirement to tell someone they're NOT a beneficiary. How could there be, if you think about it.
So it's a judgement call.
Is he aware of the death?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards