We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is probate necessary?
Comments
-
At a cost! Also they will ask you for the information anyway so it only lightens some of the load and it will almost certainly add time.scaredm said:
p.s. Can a solicitor, if left to deal with probate etc, do all this?Brie said:
There's an official way to advertise but you might want to start by checking her credit report for anything really obvious.scaredm said:Thank you so much.
But, gosh, this is so complicated to a complete novice. When you say "advertise for any creditors" what does this mean exactly in layman's terms?
One thing that might suggest a solicitor is a good idea is the potential issue with the other sibling. Is he likely to try to contest the Will or make things difficult? If so, you might want to involve a solicitor at some point so you don’t have to personally deal with that son.
Otherwise is isn’t as daunting a task as it might sound, honestly. Once you start it starts to get clearer. Have a look at the forms. It sounds like mother left good records which is really helpful. I never bothered with advertising for creditors as I knew the finances and was as certain as possible that there were none.2 -
The other brother is a huge concern. Up until a few days ago, we thought he was getting a third. (He didn't know he was getting anything as he's been estranged for a few years). However, when we got the latest version of the will from the solicitor, mother-in-law had drawn a line through his name and it was initialed (witnessed) by the solicitor and her carer. According to the solicitor it's legally binding.poppystar said:
At a cost! Also they will ask you for the information anyway so it only lightens some of the load and it will almost certainly add time.scaredm said:
p.s. Can a solicitor, if left to deal with probate etc, do all this?Brie said:
There's an official way to advertise but you might want to start by checking her credit report for anything really obvious.scaredm said:Thank you so much.
But, gosh, this is so complicated to a complete novice. When you say "advertise for any creditors" what does this mean exactly in layman's terms?
One thing that might suggest a solicitor is a good idea is the potential issue with the other sibling. Is he likely to try to contest the Will or make things difficult? If so, you might want to involve a solicitor at some point so you don’t have to personally deal with that son.
Otherwise is isn’t as daunting a task as it might sound, honestly. Once you start it starts to get clearer. Have a look at the forms. It sounds like mother left good records which is really helpful. I never bothered with advertising for creditors as I knew the finances and was as certain as possible that there were none.0 -
It definitely isn't as daunting as it sounds - "officially" you are supposed to advertise in the gazette and paper for creditors as this absolves the executor HOWEVER the beneficiaries would still be liable if someone turned up a a later date. I was sole exec and beneficiary so made no difference and I didn't advertise. Solicitors always do - it delays the process and adds to the costs but they don't know the deceased finances and can't take the risk.
In most cases it is unlikely that there are creditors - maybe the odd newsagents bill, etc etc but likely to be minimal
I would do the probate (seriously loads of us on here hadn't a clue and managed with help and hints from otehrs) and then you will need a solicitor to handle the sale of the property.
PS good point above about the other sibling, is he likely to turn up wanting his share?1 -
It is legally binding but there is nothing to stop the other siblings doing a deed of variation to give some to him - either from a sense of fairness, love or simply to reduce the likelihood of any challenge. A challenge is unlikely to succeed but could delay things. I am amazed though that this was just done by a line through his name rather than a new Will! The original Will will become a public document and although it makes no difference I think I’d rather it showed no mention of the estranged person rather than seeing a line through the name - just my personal feelings.scaredm said:
The other brother is a huge concern. Up until a few days ago, we thought he was getting a third. (He didn't know he was getting anything as he's been estranged for a few years). However, when we got the latest version of the will from the solicitor, mother-in-law had drawn a line through his name and it was initialed (witnessed) by the solicitor and her carer. According to the solicitor it's legally binding.poppystar said:
At a cost! Also they will ask you for the information anyway so it only lightens some of the load and it will almost certainly add time.scaredm said:
p.s. Can a solicitor, if left to deal with probate etc, do all this?Brie said:
There's an official way to advertise but you might want to start by checking her credit report for anything really obvious.scaredm said:Thank you so much.
But, gosh, this is so complicated to a complete novice. When you say "advertise for any creditors" what does this mean exactly in layman's terms?
One thing that might suggest a solicitor is a good idea is the potential issue with the other sibling. Is he likely to try to contest the Will or make things difficult? If so, you might want to involve a solicitor at some point so you don’t have to personally deal with that son.
Otherwise is isn’t as daunting a task as it might sound, honestly. Once you start it starts to get clearer. Have a look at the forms. It sounds like mother left good records which is really helpful. I never bothered with advertising for creditors as I knew the finances and was as certain as possible that there were none.1 -
Absolutely! This was our feeling too.poppystar said:
It is legally binding but there is nothing to stop the other siblings doing a deed of variation to give some to him - either from a sense of fairness, love or simply to reduce the likelihood of any challenge. A challenge is unlikely to succeed but could delay things. I am amazed though that this was just done by a line through his name rather than a new Will! The original Will will become a public document and although it makes no difference I think I’d rather it showed no mention of the estranged person rather than seeing a line through the name - just my personal feelings.scaredm said:
The other brother is a huge concern. Up until a few days ago, we thought he was getting a third. (He didn't know he was getting anything as he's been estranged for a few years). However, when we got the latest version of the will from the solicitor, mother-in-law had drawn a line through his name and it was initialed (witnessed) by the solicitor and her carer. According to the solicitor it's legally binding.poppystar said:
At a cost! Also they will ask you for the information anyway so it only lightens some of the load and it will almost certainly add time.scaredm said:
p.s. Can a solicitor, if left to deal with probate etc, do all this?Brie said:
There's an official way to advertise but you might want to start by checking her credit report for anything really obvious.scaredm said:Thank you so much.
But, gosh, this is so complicated to a complete novice. When you say "advertise for any creditors" what does this mean exactly in layman's terms?
One thing that might suggest a solicitor is a good idea is the potential issue with the other sibling. Is he likely to try to contest the Will or make things difficult? If so, you might want to involve a solicitor at some point so you don’t have to personally deal with that son.
Otherwise is isn’t as daunting a task as it might sound, honestly. Once you start it starts to get clearer. Have a look at the forms. It sounds like mother left good records which is really helpful. I never bothered with advertising for creditors as I knew the finances and was as certain as possible that there were none.
The brother is a real bad'n. Long history of lies, deception, theft. MIL was originally talked into leaving it 3-ways by her solicitor as she was told none of the siblings could then contest. When the solicitor went to her house a year ago with the paperwork, MIL apparently was adamant that the eldest sibling was crossed out. The solicitor asked her carer to witness and the rest is history. If a deed of variation was drawn up, it would only be to prevent further trouble down the line. There is certainly no love lost.0 -
I agree - curious it wasn't a new will or codicil. How difficult for you all. Sounds like brother didn't expect any - has he been involved at all?0
-
Not involved in the slightest. He's been completely estranged for approx 3 years. Brother has no idea if he's in the will or not. And we don't know how/when/if to tell him he's not. Any advice on that?Flugelhorn said:I agree - curious it wasn't a new will or codicil. How difficult for you all. Sounds like brother didn't expect any - has he been involved at all?1 -
scaredm said:
Not involved in the slightest. He's been completely estranged for approx 3 years. Brother has no idea if he's in the will or not. And we don't know how/when/if to tell him he's not. Any advice on that?Flugelhorn said:I agree - curious it wasn't a new will or codicil. How difficult for you all. Sounds like brother didn't expect any - has he been involved at all?
There's no legal requirement to tell someone they're NOT a beneficiary. How could there be, if you think about it.
So it's a judgement call.
Is he aware of the death?How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)1 -
There's no need to do it unless there is some doubt about the deceased's finances - it might make sense if it's, say, someone who was self-employed and whose finances were in a mess, but seems utterly pointless for e.g. someone who's been in a nursing home for the past decade, especially if somebody else was looking after their money towards the end. And as you say, the chances of a creditor perusing the Gazette etc seems remote.Flugelhorn said:It definitely isn't as daunting as it sounds - "officially" you are supposed to advertise in the gazette and paper for creditors as this absolves the executor HOWEVER the beneficiaries would still be liable if someone turned up a a later date. I was sole exec and beneficiary so made no difference and I didn't advertise. Solicitors always do - it delays the process and adds to the costs but they don't know the deceased finances and can't take the risk.1 -
Yes he is.Sea_Shell said:scaredm said:
Not involved in the slightest. He's been completely estranged for approx 3 years. Brother has no idea if he's in the will or not. And we don't know how/when/if to tell him he's not. Any advice on that?Flugelhorn said:I agree - curious it wasn't a new will or codicil. How difficult for you all. Sounds like brother didn't expect any - has he been involved at all?
There's no legal requirement to tell someone they're NOT a beneficiary. How could there be, if you think about it.
So it's a judgement call.
Is he aware of the death?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

