We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Refusing a smart meter installation
Comments
-
How reliable is this functionality?Ultrasonic said:The purpose of a smart meter is not to save you money. From a customer perspective the main benefit is no longer having to send meter readings to your supplier,
The only person I know with a smart meter is my Mum - they had one fitted in what was the family house. That meter never communicated to the outside world because of a poor mobile signal apparently. So, it still required meter readings to be taken and sent in.
Mum has now moved to a bungalow and the smart meter is not linked to the supplier because Mum changed supplier away from the default and that, apparently, requires a new smart meter for the new supplier. Again, it means meter readings need to be taken and sent in.
I can't see the point of changing our meter to smart meter if it needs swapping every time there is a change of supplier. It also seems very wasteful to create all this WEE waste every time utility supplier changes. Good for creating jobs for meter fitters though.2 -
Grumpy_chap said:Mum has now moved to a bungalow and the smart meter is not linked to the supplier because Mum changed supplier away from the default and that, apparently, requires a new smart meter for the new supplier. Again, it means meter readings need to be taken and sent in.That shouldn't be the case. Smart meters communicate with the DCC, and the DCC's data is accessible to whichever supplier you use.An exception would be if she has one of the early first-generation meters that connected directly to the supplier and can't be redirected to speak to the DCC.
I can't see the point of changing our meter to smart meter if it needs swapping every time there is a change of supplier.
As above, this shouldn't be the case.N. Hampshire, he/him. Octopus Intelligent Go elec & Tracker gas / Vodafone BB / iD mobile. Ripple Kirk Hill Coop member.Ofgem cap table, Ofgem cap explainer. Economy 7 cap explainer. Gas vs E7 vs peak elec heating costs, Best kettle!
2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 3.6kw inverter. 34 MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.3 -
In my personal experience it has been 100% reliable, including with my smart meter having been using with 4 different suppliers now. Nobody should need to change meters just because they change suppliers. Can there be issues? Yes, as your Mum's experience has shown. The silent majority just have a smart meter fitted and have no issues though. People who don't have issues generally don't post on forums like this to say so. Crucially, for anyone that does have an issue of data not being sent, they are no worse off that with their previous 'dumb' meter.Grumpy_chap said:
How reliable is this functionality?Ultrasonic said:The purpose of a smart meter is not to save you money. From a customer perspective the main benefit is no longer having to send meter readings to your supplier,
The only person I know with a smart meter is my Mum - they had one fitted in what was the family house. That meter never communicated to the outside world because of a poor mobile signal apparently. So, it still required meter readings to be taken and sent in.
Mum has now moved to a bungalow and the smart meter is not linked to the supplier because Mum changed supplier away from the default and that, apparently, requires a new smart meter for the new supplier. Again, it means meter readings need to be taken and sent in.
I can't see the point of changing our meter to smart meter if it needs swapping every time there is a change of supplier. It also seems very wasteful to create all this WEE waste every time utility supplier changes. Good for creating jobs for meter fitters though.2 -
they are no worse off that with their previous 'dumb' meter.
So you can read your meter from 6ft away with a torch ?
2 -
Thanks. I spotted that too. It should probably say:Ofgem's site (at your link) is unfortunately worded:The "must install" in the first sentence overrides the customer choice mentioned further down in the box.The latest Ofgem communication on the smart meter rollout seems to be this open letter:
In all other cases you can choose not to accept an offer to have a smart meter fitted.
I see from the open letter that 'abort rates' for the larger suppliers are 23%. I wonder how many of these are due to bad communication with the customer i.e. the fitter turns up and the customer just says, "What? Not today thank you!". From the general tone of the Ofgem letter relating to quotas, this may explain why I am being told I'm having one without being asked.1 -
I couldn't do that on a dumb meter any more than I could with a smart meter! Possibly somebody with better eyesight than me could on a dumb meter but this is a particularly bizarre criterion to introduce!molerat said:they are no worse off that with their previous 'dumb' meter.So you can read your meter from 6ft away with a torch ?
If someone has a meter in a particularly bizarre place where this might become an issue then I'll leave it up to them to consider, but a long stick to push the button on a smart meter would probably do the trick. Those with hard to access meters would however see far more of a benefit from a working smart meter than any current 'dumb' meter.3 -
SMETS1 used mobile networks. We couldn't have a SMETS1 meter due to no signal. They installed a new conventional meter instead (old one was faulty - ironically, so is the replacement but it's in my favour). SMETS2 don't use mobile signals. 99.25% of households work with a SMETS2 meter.pineapple said:They can't fit smart meters everywhere even if the customer wants them. Next door got harangued and thought it was obligatory so she had them round and guess what - she can't have one due to the poor mobile phone signal. Which also applies to me.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
In fairness though, if you turn up to most peoples homes on a weekday you're going to have issues getting in, at least with us and our neighbours. We're either doing something or sleeping (depending on work schedules) at these times.Glum said:
Thanks. I spotted that too. It should probably say:Ofgem's site (at your link) is unfortunately worded:The "must install" in the first sentence overrides the customer choice mentioned further down in the box.The latest Ofgem communication on the smart meter rollout seems to be this open letter:
In all other cases you can choose not to accept an offer to have a smart meter fitted.
I see from the open letter that 'abort rates' for the larger suppliers are 23%. I wonder how many of these are due to bad communication with the customer i.e. the fitter turns up and the customer just says, "What? Not today thank you!". From the general tone of the Ofgem letter relating to quotas, this may explain why I am being told I'm having one without being asked.
I've said to the company that wants to install for us that I'd take no issue with them installing it, just we can't guarantee to be in on the timescales they're looking at (I refuse to be unable to schedule meetings due to power going out for a while just to sit in all day for someone to not arrive as timed slots aren't on offer), they're insisting, despite both meters being outside, that someone is home for the install. They won't even give an hour's notice to be home so it's not as if I can reschedule 1/2 calls on the day, come home and then go back to the office.💙💛 💔1 -
SMETS2 meters in the Southern and Central regions use the Telefonica (O2) mobile network. Northern regions use UHF radio frequencies managed by Arqiva.dunstonh said:
SMETS1 used mobile networks. We couldn't have a SMETS1 meter due to no signal. They installed a new conventional meter instead (old one was faulty - ironically, so is the replacement but it's in my favour). SMETS2 don't use mobile signals. 99.25% of households work with a SMETS2 meter.pineapple said:They can't fit smart meters everywhere even if the customer wants them. Next door got harangued and thought it was obligatory so she had them round and guess what - she can't have one due to the poor mobile phone signal. Which also applies to me.
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards



