We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
UKPC / DCB Legal - Part 2 - I WON IN COURT
Comments
-
The claimant is a serial litigant and is at an unfair advantage at a non attended papers only hearing.4
-
Thanks GrizebeckGrizebeck said:The claimant is a serial litigant and is at an unfair advantage at a non attended papers only hearing.
I have managed to fit it all in the box provided.
The Claimant is a firm who complete cut & paste parking case paperwork for a living, The claimant is a serial litigant and is at an unfair advantage at a non attended papers only hearing. Years of Intimidating demands from this aggressive parking firm and agents. I wish to question the Claimant about their evidence at a hearing in person and to expose omissions and any misleading or incorrect evidence or assertions. I need a voice at an attended hearing.
If this is acceptable I will email my questionnaire to the court. Thank you0 -
Maybe changes as aboveIloveElephants said:The Claimant is a firm who complete cut & paste parking case paperwork for a living and is a serial litigant with and is at an unfair advantage at a non-attended papers only hearing. After Years years of Intimidating demands from this aggressive parking firm and agents, I wish to question the Claimant about their evidence at a hearing in person and to expose omissions and any misleading or incorrect evidence or assertions. I need a voice at an attended hearing.3 -
That's brilliant, thank you so much LeKirkLe_Kirk said:
Maybe changes as aboveIloveElephants said:The Claimant is a firm who complete cut & paste parking case paperwork for a living and is a serial litigant with and is at an unfair advantage at a non-attended papers only hearing. After Years years of Intimidating demands from this aggressive parking firm and agents, I wish to question the Claimant about their evidence at a hearing in person and to expose omissions and any misleading or incorrect evidence or assertions. I need a voice at an attended hearing.0 -
Hi Everyone,Le_Kirk said:
Maybe changes as aboveIloveElephants said:The Claimant is a firm who complete cut & paste parking case paperwork for a living and is a serial litigant with and is at an unfair advantage at a non-attended papers only hearing. After Years years of Intimidating demands from this aggressive parking firm and agents, I wish to question the Claimant about their evidence at a hearing in person and to expose omissions and any misleading or incorrect evidence or assertions. I need a voice at an attended hearing.
Something that made me think regarding this wording "After Years of intimidating demands" do you think saying years will work against me to the judge? He may ask why I didn't do anything about it sooner?0 -
Its only a n180 for christ sake why on earth are you making such heavy weather over such a formIloveElephants said:
Hi Everyone,Le_Kirk said:
Maybe changes as aboveIloveElephants said:The Claimant is a firm who complete cut & paste parking case paperwork for a living and is a serial litigant with and is at an unfair advantage at a non-attended papers only hearing. After Years years of Intimidating demands from this aggressive parking firm and agents, I wish to question the Claimant about their evidence at a hearing in person and to expose omissions and any misleading or incorrect evidence or assertions. I need a voice at an attended hearing.
Something that made me think regarding this wording "After Years of intimidating demands" do you think saying years will work against me to the judge? He may ask why I didn't do anything about it sooner?6 -
ok thanks GrizebeckGrizebeck said:
Its only a n180 for christ sake why on earth are you making such heavy weather over such a formIloveElephants said:
Hi Everyone,Le_Kirk said:
Maybe changes as aboveIloveElephants said:The Claimant is a firm who complete cut & paste parking case paperwork for a living and is a serial litigant with and is at an unfair advantage at a non-attended papers only hearing. After Years years of Intimidating demands from this aggressive parking firm and agents, I wish to question the Claimant about their evidence at a hearing in person and to expose omissions and any misleading or incorrect evidence or assertions. I need a voice at an attended hearing.
Something that made me think regarding this wording "After Years of intimidating demands" do you think saying years will work against me to the judge? He may ask why I didn't do anything about it sooner?0 -
Hope everyone is well
I have sent my n180 to CCBC AQ and dcb"legal" via email yesterday.
mcol has not updated.
I have 2 days until my deadline, I received the email acknowledgment reply
Shall I also send a copy of the pdf to UKPC ?
Thank you everyone,0 -
No.3
-
Ok thanks Keith,KeithP said:No.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
