UKPC / DCB Legal - Part 2 - I WON IN COURT

Le_Kirk

If it helps your case, leave in the poor signage and remember the driver did not see it on the day but, following a further visit after receipt of the PCN and N1 claim, a further visit for research purposes was made.

IloveElephants

Le_Kirk said:

If it helps your case, leave in the poor signage and remember the driver did not see it on the day but, following a further visit after receipt of the PCN and N1 claim, a further visit for research purposes was made.

Thanks Le Kirk, I will mention the driver did see it after receipt of the PCN when the driver returned to the vehicle the following morning (2019).   As far as I know this carpark is no longer managed by UKPC anymore, the claim form came 3 years later to the defendant, by this point we know the carpark is no longer managed by UKPC and do not know when UKPC stopped managing this site. A further visit for research purposes was made after receiving the claim form and it appears the site is no longer managed by UKPC. (need to fact check this) If anyone knows this location?

IloveElephants

1505grandad said:

See para 21 in the following WS:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/nrdvuuvmtxpdf5i/WS DRAFT URGENT.pdf?dl=

Thank you granddad

IloveElephants

I have made the changes to my WS - I have highlighted them all in Orange -

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_cU8lqf4dNBrMiab-lxZCYuRFJNJ-P1C/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115730171096675321578&rtpof=true&sd=true

Thank you to everyone

1505grandad

Your new para 35 includes a reference to para 27 which is not relevant in your case.

IloveElephants

1505grandad said:

Your new para 35 includes a reference to para 27 which is not relevant in your case.

Thanks 1505grandad said:

See para 21 in the following WS:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/nrdvuuvmtxpdf5i/WS DRAFT URGENT.pdf?dl=

Thanks Granddad, I have deleted the reference to para 27 

patient_dream

IloveElephants ...... as this is another daft case from UKPC with unreadable signs unless you have a magnifier .... what will DCBL do ?

Continue and get another court spanking when you can claim your costs
OR CHICKEN OUT and discontinue because the UKPC claim is rubbish .... as usual

Coupon-mad

Looks fine if you add the Beavis case sign which is not shown in your link, and of course Excel v Wilkinson as an exhibit, like everyone else does in all WS you have ben signposted to read.

This bit makes no sense!  It is not DCBLegal who are the claimant parking firm, it was not up to DCBLegal to do anything:

Due to the lack of any correspondence from DCB LEGAL Ltd and the fact that notice was not ‘given’ they have clearly failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act (POFA) 2012. See Exhibit HP1.

IloveElephants

patient_dream said:

IloveElephants ...... as this is another daft case from UKPC with unreadable signs unless you have a magnifier .... what will DCBL do ?

Continue and get another court spanking when you can claim your costs
OR CHICKEN OUT and discontinue because the UKPC claim is rubbish .... as usual

Thank you Patient dream, you are correct, UKPC do not even try to make an effort, signs hidden from parked vehicles, no signage upon entry to the carpark, no barriers upon entry, lack of lighting and markings to suggest the terms and conditions. Its pathetic how these companies get away with cheating people like this. 

IloveElephants

Coupon-mad said:

Looks fine if you add the Beavis case sign which is not shown in your link, and of course Excel v Wilkinson as an exhibit, like everyone else does in all WS you have ben signposted to read.

This bit makes no sense!  It is not DCBLegal who are the claimant parking firm, it was not up to DCBLegal to do anything:

Due to the lack of any correspondence from DCB LEGAL Ltd and the fact that notice was not ‘given’ they have clearly failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act (POFA) 2012. See Exhibit HP1.

Hi Coupon-mad

Thank you for your feedback, please read my paragraph 12 Beavis case with added image, and prar 16 to 19, I have highlighted regarding Excel v Wilkinson, the changes you suggested in orange. 

Thank you once again