We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
Letter Before Claim - CST Law & Smart Parking Limited

JayH97
Posts: 29 Forumite

Hi All,
I've been a frequent browser in the threads for a while now since I received a parking charge notice from Smart Parking Limited. I originally (and stupidly) paid one of these at the discounted rate and thought that was the end of it. However, I also apparently got another parking charge the month prior to this, with no notification of such through the post, no posted sticker on the windscreen and the first correspondence I received was from Debt Recovery Plus. I then tried to appeal with Smart Parking to inform them that I'd never received any correspondence of this parking charge but was told due to the appeal being outside of the required time period, I would only be allowed to correspond with Debt Recovery Plus.
Now it's been around 6 months and I've finally received a LBC from CST Law on behalf of Debt Recovery Plus. I've done the SAR request to Smart Parking and also informed CST that I have done this.
Is there any route or further action I should be taking?
Thanks for any help in advance.
J
I've been a frequent browser in the threads for a while now since I received a parking charge notice from Smart Parking Limited. I originally (and stupidly) paid one of these at the discounted rate and thought that was the end of it. However, I also apparently got another parking charge the month prior to this, with no notification of such through the post, no posted sticker on the windscreen and the first correspondence I received was from Debt Recovery Plus. I then tried to appeal with Smart Parking to inform them that I'd never received any correspondence of this parking charge but was told due to the appeal being outside of the required time period, I would only be allowed to correspond with Debt Recovery Plus.
Now it's been around 6 months and I've finally received a LBC from CST Law on behalf of Debt Recovery Plus. I've done the SAR request to Smart Parking and also informed CST that I have done this.
Is there any route or further action I should be taking?
Thanks for any help in advance.
J
0
Comments
-
What happened when you complained to the landowner?
Have you complained to your MP yet?
Debt Recovery Plus are powerless debt collectors and can safely be ignored.
If CST law are acting for a powerless debt collector who can be ignored, then CST Law are acting as powerless debt collectors and can safely be ignored.
DRP cannot start a court claim. Only Smart Parking Ltd can do that.
Ignore anything and everything from now on unless you get a LBC/LOC or court claim from Smart Parking.
I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks2 -
JayH97 said:Hi All,
I've been a frequent browser in the threads for a while now since I received a parking charge notice from Smart Parking Limited. I originally (and stupidly) paid one of these at the discounted rate and thought that was the end of it. However, I also apparently got another parking charge the month prior to this, with no notification of such through the post, no posted sticker on the windscreen and the first correspondence I received was from Debt Recovery Plus. I then tried to appeal with Smart Parking to inform them that I'd never received any correspondence of this parking charge but was told due to the appeal being outside of the required time period, I would only be allowed to correspond with Debt Recovery Plus.
Now it's been around 6 months and I've finally received a LBC from CST Law on behalf of Debt Recovery Plus. I've done the SAR request to Smart Parking and also informed CST that I have done this.
Is there any route or further action I should be taking?
Thanks for any help in advance.
J
DRP are only money scammers and circus clowns who have added a fake £60/£70
NEVER EVER DEAL WITH DRP unless you want to have some fun with a scammer ?
CST LAW
Did they really say "on behalf of DRP" ??
DRP cannot instruct anyone because they have no power to do so.
CST Law fail to grasp this therefore making themselves look complete fools ....
LETTER BEFORE CLAIM
The instruction can only come from SMART. You must respond ...
1: Advising CST that you seeking debt advice and require them to extend their claim by a further 30 days. Not sure if CST understand this but under PAP IT IS THE LAW.
2: If they think that DRP instructed them, they will be happy to provide a parking ticket issued by DRP .... ???
3: What is their legal authority to add fake amounts
Seems CST Law don't want to answer these questions, never seen a reply from them ........ because they cannot
DRP as said are only money scammers, they are no more important than anything that lives in the sewers
Work this one out, Smart, DRP and CST Law are members of the BPA ?
That's just 3 scammers in the BPA membership, there are so many in this little club
THE HISTORY OF CST LAW ...... it really is a big jokeCST letters' forum group thread
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6166004/cst-letters-forum-group-thread/p1
2 -
Fruitcake said:What happened when you complained to the landowner?
Have you complained to your MP yet?
Debt Recovery Plus are powerless debt collectors and can safely be ignored.
If CST law are acting for a powerless debt collector who can be ignored, then CST Law are acting as powerless debt collectors and can safely be ignored.
DRP cannot start a court claim. Only Smart Parking Ltd can do that.
Ignore anything and everything from now on unless you get a LBC/LOC or court claim from Smart Parking.
When I emailed the MP it was also greatly unhelpful as his office would only accept messages if I could provide my home address to confirm I was in their constituency!
The letter I have received today was a LBC, together with the reply forms but to my knowledge not the actual letter of claim as they are still offering me the "way out" of actually paying it. I've submitted the SAR request. Would it not actually be CST that issues the LOC, would that have to come directly from Smart Parking Ltd?0 -
patient_dream said:JayH97 said:Hi All,
I've been a frequent browser in the threads for a while now since I received a parking charge notice from Smart Parking Limited. I originally (and stupidly) paid one of these at the discounted rate and thought that was the end of it. However, I also apparently got another parking charge the month prior to this, with no notification of such through the post, no posted sticker on the windscreen and the first correspondence I received was from Debt Recovery Plus. I then tried to appeal with Smart Parking to inform them that I'd never received any correspondence of this parking charge but was told due to the appeal being outside of the required time period, I would only be allowed to correspond with Debt Recovery Plus.
Now it's been around 6 months and I've finally received a LBC from CST Law on behalf of Debt Recovery Plus. I've done the SAR request to Smart Parking and also informed CST that I have done this.
Is there any route or further action I should be taking?
Thanks for any help in advance.
J
DRP are only money scammers and circus clowns who have added a fake £60/£70
NEVER EVER DEAL WITH DRP unless you want to have some fun with a scammer ?
CST LAW
Did they really say "on behalf of DRP" ??
DRP cannot instruct anyone because they have no power to do so.
CST Law fail to grasp this therefore making themselves look complete fools ....
LETTER BEFORE CLAIM
The instruction can only come from SMART. You must respond ...
1: Advising CST that you seeking debt advice and require them to extend their claim by a further 30 days. Not sure if CST understand this but under PAP IT IS THE LAW.
2: If they think that DRP instructed them, they will be happy to provide a parking ticket issued by DRP .... ???
3: What is their legal authority to add fake amounts
Seems CST Law don't want to answer these questions, never seen a reply from them ........ because they cannot
DRP as said are only money scammers, they are no more important than anything that lives in the sewers
Work this one out, Smart, DRP and CST Law are members of the BPA ?
That's just 3 scammers in the BPA membership, there are so many in this little club
THE HISTORY OF CST LAW ...... it really is a big jokeCST letters' forum group thread
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6166004/cst-letters-forum-group-thread/p1
Apologies no, it was that they are "instructed by Smart Parking Ltd to commence legal action against me to recover the amount outstanding", full with reply forms within 30 days. I've submitted my SAR request to the DPO at Smart Parking and also have emailed CST to advise of point one under PAP. I'm guessing now it's just a case of waiting for a Letter of Claim if it ever comes and then go through the MCOL thread?
I got in touch with the BPA funnily enough to raise complaints about all of them and that went little to nowhere, seems like it's completely acceptable to run a cowboy business ripping off elderly and working class people!1 -
JayH97 said:Fruitcake said:What happened when you complained to the landowner?
Have you complained to your MP yet?
Debt Recovery Plus are powerless debt collectors and can safely be ignored.
If CST law are acting for a powerless debt collector who can be ignored, then CST Law are acting as powerless debt collectors and can safely be ignored.
DRP cannot start a court claim. Only Smart Parking Ltd can do that.
Ignore anything and everything from now on unless you get a LBC/LOC or court claim from Smart Parking.
When I emailed the MP it was also greatly unhelpful as his office would only accept messages if I could provide my home address to confirm I was in their constituency!
Weren't you able to confirm that you lived in their constituency?
The suggestion was that you complain to your MP.3 -
KeithP said:JayH97 said:Fruitcake said:What happened when you complained to the landowner?
Have you complained to your MP yet?
Debt Recovery Plus are powerless debt collectors and can safely be ignored.
If CST law are acting for a powerless debt collector who can be ignored, then CST Law are acting as powerless debt collectors and can safely be ignored.
DRP cannot start a court claim. Only Smart Parking Ltd can do that.
Ignore anything and everything from now on unless you get a LBC/LOC or court claim from Smart Parking.
When I emailed the MP it was also greatly unhelpful as his office would only accept messages if I could provide my home address to confirm I was in their constituency!
Weren't you able to confirm that you lived in their constituency?
The suggestion was that you complain to your MP.0 -
JayH97 said:patient_dream said:JayH97 said:Hi All,
I've been a frequent browser in the threads for a while now since I received a parking charge notice from Smart Parking Limited. I originally (and stupidly) paid one of these at the discounted rate and thought that was the end of it. However, I also apparently got another parking charge the month prior to this, with no notification of such through the post, no posted sticker on the windscreen and the first correspondence I received was from Debt Recovery Plus. I then tried to appeal with Smart Parking to inform them that I'd never received any correspondence of this parking charge but was told due to the appeal being outside of the required time period, I would only be allowed to correspond with Debt Recovery Plus.
Now it's been around 6 months and I've finally received a LBC from CST Law on behalf of Debt Recovery Plus. I've done the SAR request to Smart Parking and also informed CST that I have done this.
Is there any route or further action I should be taking?
Thanks for any help in advance.
J
DRP are only money scammers and circus clowns who have added a fake £60/£70
NEVER EVER DEAL WITH DRP unless you want to have some fun with a scammer ?
CST LAW
Did they really say "on behalf of DRP" ??
DRP cannot instruct anyone because they have no power to do so.
CST Law fail to grasp this therefore making themselves look complete fools ....
LETTER BEFORE CLAIM
The instruction can only come from SMART. You must respond ...
1: Advising CST that you seeking debt advice and require them to extend their claim by a further 30 days. Not sure if CST understand this but under PAP IT IS THE LAW.
2: If they think that DRP instructed them, they will be happy to provide a parking ticket issued by DRP .... ???
3: What is their legal authority to add fake amounts
Seems CST Law don't want to answer these questions, never seen a reply from them ........ because they cannot
DRP as said are only money scammers, they are no more important than anything that lives in the sewers
Work this one out, Smart, DRP and CST Law are members of the BPA ?
That's just 3 scammers in the BPA membership, there are so many in this little club
THE HISTORY OF CST LAW ...... it really is a big jokeCST letters' forum group thread
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6166004/cst-letters-forum-group-thread/p1
Apologies no, it was that they are "instructed by Smart Parking Ltd to commence legal action against me to recover the amount outstanding", full with reply forms within 30 days. I've submitted my SAR request to the DPO at Smart Parking and also have emailed CST to advise of point one under PAP. I'm guessing now it's just a case of waiting for a Letter of Claim if it ever comes and then go through the MCOL thread?
I got in touch with the BPA funnily enough to raise complaints about all of them and that went little to nowhere, seems like it's completely acceptable to run a cowboy business ripping off elderly and working class people!
2: If they think that DRP instructed them, they will be happy to provide a parking ticket issued by DRP .... ???
Points 1 & 3 are still appicable and if they reply, they normally don't, we would like to see it.
Right now the BPA have been caught with their trousers down, very difficult to explain away a money scammer ? their members .... don't expect much.
End of the day if this went to court it's not Smart or CSTLaw who have the final say, it is the judge
CST Law with daft claims can only result in them being spanked, maybe why we don't see much action from CSTLaw apart from their scary letters1 -
You have not received a real LBC.
Ignore it2 -
You're not in Scotland by any chance?Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street3 -
patient_dream said:JayH97 said:patient_dream said:JayH97 said:Hi All,
I've been a frequent browser in the threads for a while now since I received a parking charge notice from Smart Parking Limited. I originally (and stupidly) paid one of these at the discounted rate and thought that was the end of it. However, I also apparently got another parking charge the month prior to this, with no notification of such through the post, no posted sticker on the windscreen and the first correspondence I received was from Debt Recovery Plus. I then tried to appeal with Smart Parking to inform them that I'd never received any correspondence of this parking charge but was told due to the appeal being outside of the required time period, I would only be allowed to correspond with Debt Recovery Plus.
Now it's been around 6 months and I've finally received a LBC from CST Law on behalf of Debt Recovery Plus. I've done the SAR request to Smart Parking and also informed CST that I have done this.
Is there any route or further action I should be taking?
Thanks for any help in advance.
J
DRP are only money scammers and circus clowns who have added a fake £60/£70
NEVER EVER DEAL WITH DRP unless you want to have some fun with a scammer ?
CST LAW
Did they really say "on behalf of DRP" ??
DRP cannot instruct anyone because they have no power to do so.
CST Law fail to grasp this therefore making themselves look complete fools ....
LETTER BEFORE CLAIM
The instruction can only come from SMART. You must respond ...
1: Advising CST that you seeking debt advice and require them to extend their claim by a further 30 days. Not sure if CST understand this but under PAP IT IS THE LAW.
2: If they think that DRP instructed them, they will be happy to provide a parking ticket issued by DRP .... ???
3: What is their legal authority to add fake amounts
Seems CST Law don't want to answer these questions, never seen a reply from them ........ because they cannot
DRP as said are only money scammers, they are no more important than anything that lives in the sewers
Work this one out, Smart, DRP and CST Law are members of the BPA ?
That's just 3 scammers in the BPA membership, there are so many in this little club
THE HISTORY OF CST LAW ...... it really is a big jokeCST letters' forum group thread
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6166004/cst-letters-forum-group-thread/p1
Apologies no, it was that they are "instructed by Smart Parking Ltd to commence legal action against me to recover the amount outstanding", full with reply forms within 30 days. I've submitted my SAR request to the DPO at Smart Parking and also have emailed CST to advise of point one under PAP. I'm guessing now it's just a case of waiting for a Letter of Claim if it ever comes and then go through the MCOL thread?
I got in touch with the BPA funnily enough to raise complaints about all of them and that went little to nowhere, seems like it's completely acceptable to run a cowboy business ripping off elderly and working class people!
2: If they think that DRP instructed them, they will be happy to provide a parking ticket issued by DRP .... ???
Points 1 & 3 are still appicable and if they reply, they normally don't, we would like to see it.
Right now the BPA have been caught with their trousers down, very difficult to explain away a money scammer ? their members .... don't expect much.
End of the day if this went to court it's not Smart or CSTLaw who have the final say, it is the judge
CST Law with daft claims can only result in them being spanked, maybe why we don't see much action from CSTLaw apart from their scary letters
Hopefully they just keep sending these letters over and no letter of actual claim even comes. Even if it does I think the SAR request should clearly show that no letter was ever generated to even make me aware of the PCN in the first place!0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards