We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parking stories in the News/media
Comments
-
Smart parking have infested another hotel car park
https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/seething-stuart-lands-two-parking-104755825 -
Printing receipts confirming VRM registration must become mandatory for all operators . It’s unfair to try and prove your case when they are the only ones with access to the records ,alanjuk said:Smart parking have infested another hotel car park
https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/seething-stuart-lands-two-parking-104755827 -
quote from https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/seething-stuart-lands-two-parking-10475582"with only a very small handful of appeals raised. This shows the system is functioning correctly. In the rare cases where fines are issued, it is almost always due to registration details being entered incorrectly or the ‘confirm’ button not being pressed to complete the process."functioning correctly? ... yes for smart parking it is ££££
3 -
with only a very small handful of appeals raised. This shows the system is functioning correctly.As clearly evidenced by the fact an innocent man simply paid.4
-
https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/he-kissing-pupils-placing-hands-3307289Chris Naylor? Would that be Chris Naylor, the disgraced former teacher - barred from ever teaching again after getting drunk and kissing pupils at Year 11 prom then trying to blackmail his employers when disciplined, who is now on the IPC's board?
https://www.theipc.info/people
They certainly have a striking similarity.
Always remember to abide by Space Corps Directive 39436175880932/B:
'All nations attending the conference are only allocated one parking space.'
Genuine Independent 247 Advice: 247advice.uk4 -
Not the only one with a bit of 'history' at the IPC!kryten3000 said:
https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/he-kissing-pupils-placing-hands-3307289Chris Naylor? Would that be Chris Naylor, the disgraced former teacher - barred from ever teaching again after getting drunk and kissing pupils at Year 11 prom then trying to blackmail his employers when disciplined, who is now on the IPC's board?
https://www.theipc.info/people
They certainly have a striking similarity.
Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street4 -
Amazon drivers are required to have DBS checks and clearance, why not PPC workers, owners, management, and trade association employees? they also have access to personal data that in the wrong hands can be open to abuse
From the Plain Language Commission:
"The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"8 -
I'd go further - Enhanced DBS or a process similar to that for DV level security clearance for government work.Half_way said:Amazon drivers are required to have DBS checks and clearance, why not PPC workers, owners, management, and trade association employees? they also have access to personal data that in the wrong hands can be open to abuse4 -
The DVLA require a "Declaration of Good Standing" (for KADOE):-"A8. The Customer’s Declaration Of Good StandingA8.1. One of the Customer’s directors shall sign the Declaration of Good Standingat ANNEX A to confirm that each and every Related Person satisfies therequirements in that declaration.""ANNEX A - DECLARATION OF GOOD STANDING1. I declare that neither I nor any of the other Related Persons (the Customer, itsdirectors, the Commercial Manager, the Data Manager and the Key Staff):(b) has been convicted of any criminal offence relating to the conduct of hisbusiness or profession;(d) has committed an act of grave misconduct or serious misrepresentation in thecourse of the person’s business or profession;"As it is essential that (for KADOE):-"A7. Membership of an Accredited Trade AssociationA7.1. The Customer shall at all times be a member of a DVLA Accredited TradeAssociation (“ATA”) and maintain membership of the ATA and comply with the ATA’sCode of Practice."Why do the DVLA not require such a "Declaration" from the key members of the ATA to be accredited?6
-
A driver complains to Consumer Protection Bureau after APCOA charged him twice for his visit to Heathrow Airport.The Consumer Protection Bureau (CPB) intervened in the complaint against APCOA.And they say the case shows flaws in the automated system charging drivers at the UK’s biggest airport.“This is not just about one driver, ” said Yousouf Jhugroo, managing director of the Consumer Protection Bureau.“The fact that APCOA backed down shows there’s a much deeper problem in how these airport schemes are run. Consumers are being penalised for systemic errors that’s not enforcement, that’s entrapment.”“If a motorist can be billed just for driving past a camera, the term ‘Drop-Off Zone’ is misleading,” Jhugroo added.“We will not hesitate to escalate this matter to regulators if needed.”APCOA said "If an appeal had been received, the charge would have been cancelled at that time in accordance with policy, however the customer chose not to contact us directly and instead the appeal was sent via the CPB."
_____________________WATCHDOG VICTORY: CPB EXPOSES HEATHROW DROP-OFF FLAW AFTER APCOA U-TURNThe Consumer Protection Bureau urges any driver who has faced a similar situation to contact them at info@consumerprotectionbureau.co.uk, quoting “APCOA Drop-Off Case."7
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards



