PCN for not parking in designated bay

Le_Kirk

If you name anyone as driver using the transfer of liability slip at the bottom of the PCN, you will note that you have to provide the current address of that driver!

Coupon-mad

We would not say pay in full.  No-one said to pay the exaggerated claim of over £250.

Johnersh

What did the sign say... That's the contract. 

hoggy26

Le_Kirk said:

If you name anyone as driver using the transfer of liability slip at the bottom of the PCN, you will note that you have to provide the current address of that driver!

Yes I was wondering what the courts would do in that situation?

hoggy26

I've been trying to upload the picture again but it keeps coming up with an error message

"Body is 9 characters too short"

Johnersh said:

What did the sign say... That's the contract. 

It's on page 3 if you want to view it, I'll keep trying to upload it in a different format

KeithP

hoggy26 said:

I've been trying to upload the picture again but it keeps coming up with an error message

"Body is 9 characters too short"

Then write some text - at least ten characters - in the post with the pic.

hoggy26

Here is a close up of their parking conditions....

Coupon-mad

Impossible to read.  Defend your case and think about agreeing to Mediation due to it not being your finest hour of parking.

Johnersh

Interesting. That sign expressly refers to a £60 liquidated damages sum in addition to the core parking charge.

That's unusual. It *could* mean the bolt ons are more likely to be enforceable than signs which say the parking company "may" add charges.

Set against that, if all the signs are well above head height there is potential to still argue the point.... 

D_P_Dance

Interesting. That sign expressly refers to a £60 liquidated damages sum in addition to the core parking charge.

But this can surely be argued as an unfair term in a consumer conract.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/284426/oft311.pdf