Windows 11 - Thoughts?

4.8K Posts

in Techie Stuff
Windows 11 has been mentioned in another thread but the posters there (wisely) didn't want to discuss the pros and cons as it would detract from the OP's query. Thus I have created this thread. 
I moved to W11 a couple of nights ago (via forced download rather than waiting for Win Update to offer it). I did an in-situ install rather than a wipe and clean install. My thoughts?

I moved to W11 a couple of nights ago (via forced download rather than waiting for Win Update to offer it). I did an in-situ install rather than a wipe and clean install. My thoughts?
- The first obvious difference is the centre-aligned taskbar which is only really as wide as it needs to be, rather than it being left-aligned / full width. This took a bit to get used to (especially as my work laptop is still W10)
- The options when you click on the Start button (or press the Win key) are different - I'm reserving judgement for now as to how I feel about it
- In file explorer the context (right click) menu has changed a lot ... it's much compressed and you need to select More Options to see the full list. (e.g. I'll often want to open a file in, say, Notepad++ but I need to select More Options first before I see it)
- I've not encrypted my drive yet, but I may do. (I'd previously already changed my MS account to be passwordless and I login via PIN ... my laptop webcam isn't an IR type so it doesn't support Hello Face)
Jenni x
0
Latest MSE News and Guides
Replies
- you can easily left-justify the icons if the "appleisation" annoys you
- unhiding the notification/corner icons is more difficult than it was before (I like to see all the notification icons)
- upgrading Windows10 using a Windows11 ISO is painless, as is disabling CPU checking prior to doing the upgrade.
I've done a number of upgrades to 4/5 year old Intels without any performace issues.... so far...
- the 11 upgrade process doesn't prevent you from declining an internet connection but its still easy to decline use of a Microsoft account by entering [email protected] and "1" as password.
Partially because the only modern machine I've have which will run Windows 11 without registry hacks, runs Debian and that is my preferred operating system and my workflows are optimised for it.
But I just so happen to be acquiring another machine in the next few weeks which will meet the criteria of Windows 11, and as I intend using that in the main for amateur radio related activities, I'll probably happily run Windows 11 on it despite my misgivings.
The main advantages of running Windows 11 seem to centre on security. In terms of functional changes, it really is only the UI that has has been updated. I don't yet see any advantages for end users in terms of the functionality the OS delivers.
Windows 11 seems to build on what Windows 10 started, in terms of becoming more of a Microsoft controlled walled garden and creating a captive audience for Microsoft's content marketing. I have to do things to "decrappify" Windows 10 (essentially remove unwanted apps and advertising) and even more things to prevent Windows 10 from transmitting data I don't want to share with Microsoft to Redmond.
Windows 11 builds on this, buy providing more undefeatable ways for content providers (and Microsoft themselves) to enforce DRM. This is the mentality that you can never really buy perpetual licenses for things (software, music, movies and other media) but you will instead subscribe to them.
I think turning an operating system into a medium for delivering content and advertising represents a natural conflict of interest. I would much rather pay for an operating system that is simply operating system. That is to say it provides a desktop UI, resource scheduling and a set of APIs for the software I run on my computer.
I will run Windows 11 on some machines because it is in my interest, as a maintainer of systems that run the Windows operating system, to be apprised of developments in the latest version of Windows.
Microsoft has been identified as one of the companies giving money to lobbying groups opposing legislation to address climate change. I personally don't like the thought that I'm contributing to Microsoft's coffers as they earn revenue for delivering content via their operating system.
I'm also distressed by the thought of all the e-waste/landfill that Windows 11 will generate. Yes, it is possible to make Windows 11 install on unsupported hardware, but people who will take those steps are, in my opinion, the minority.
Microsoft also continue to make some questionable decisions in terms of their relationship with the open source community.
I would urge anyone who shares any of my concerns, to perhaps at least think about trying a free and open source operating system and at least make a more informed choice. And of course, I will always continue to support people with technology problems, both professionally and personally, irrespective of what operating system they choose.
Windows 11 will now require a Microsoft account to be connected to every user account, granting them the ability to correlate user behavior with one's personal identity. Even those who think they have nothing to hide should be wary of sharing potentially all of their computing activity with any company, much less one with a track record of abuse like Microsoft.
This is true for the home version unless you "hack" your way around it.
Not true for the pro version.
Per xda-developers:
The key distinction there is that it's needed during original setup. Doing an upgrade you wouldn't have done an original setup.
Having a linked Microsoft account enables assorted extra login recovery options and I think it;s usually desirable to use a linked account. I do.
Microsoft is unlikely to know your actual identity unless you use a card to make purchases through their store.
Regarding tin-foil-hats ... I'm on Home but I'd set it up on W10 with an MS account anyway. (My technophobe partner is set up with a local account).