Voyeurmse: DCBLegal Autosec DelGrosso

patient_dream

Voyeurmse said:

patient_dream said:

Yes, a complaint to the ICO about the SAR.

As suggested, will DCBL continue given the Autosec cases are very shaky and on top of that DCBL are faking it by adding £70. 
DCBL should forget all about Autosec, they will end up with more egg on their face

The initial PCN was £100
TNC added £70
DCBLegal now chasing £170 (they didn’t add more)
Autosec’s (PCN) payment page/website states £179!

Can’t be admin charges as they don’t reply to anyone!  Nor do they have any employees. 

It's all part of the "magic roundabout" where a fool and his money are easily parted

TNC FAILED so DCBL took over the fake £70

95Rollers

DCBL know what it is and what it's for as they admitted to adding it onto mine!  So although they didn't add it themselves on this occasion- they haven't removed so are therefore taking part in this practise of double recovery because they didn't delete it and just go after the original charge amount!  BPA know these fees are not recoverable through POFA.

Basically they are in a competitive business with companies like DRP, Trace, ZZPS etc all competing for the PPCs custom so they allow the the PPC to keep the ticket amount and add the double recovery for their cut instead of working on percentage based commission as they'd all have to undercut each other on commission cuts so they'd get someting like 8-10%e per PCN which probably might not be worth the bother for them or even viable depending  on the size and overheads  of  their operation.   

BUT with their current model of double recovery masquerading as admin fees they increase theirs and PPCs profits!  Most people pay up without question often due to fear of court.  Whereas its actually better to go to court as most judges are clued up on Doublr Recovery and deem it an abuse of process and if they don't... then you can evidence it in your WS!

Voyeurmse

So the latest... From my MP:

“Further to our previous correspondence, disappointingly the letter that I sent to Autosec has been returned with no forwarding address provided and I have been unable at this stage to identify an alternative address.”

There’s now a different Bradford address for correspondence (the accountants) according to Companies House.  

patient_dream

Are DCBL so desperate that they pick up the likes of Autosec from the gutter ?

Seems so ?

D_P_Dance

Ther is an address here, is it the same company ?

Redx

Axiom accountant's Bradford details are on page 1 of this thread

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6295965/need-help-over-12-500/p1

Voyeurmse

This is his address for his current active company... in property management!

18 North Bar Within, Beverley, East Yorkshire, HU17 8AX

Every business he has, has zero employees.   How on earth can that be feasible with the snout of PCN’s distributed around the country?!

I dread to think how many people have access to our personal data. 

Voyeurmse

D_P_Dance said:

Ther is an address here, is it the same company ?

He’s changing addresses all the time.  Probably to cover his back and say he didn’t receive any SAR’s. 

Castle

These are his details on the ICO Register:-
Registration number: ZA210850
Data controller: 

Auto Security Ltd

Address:

1 Morleys Mews
Beverley
HU17 9BY

Voyeurmse

Castle said:

These are his details on the ICO Register:-
Registration number: ZA210850
Data controller: 

Auto Security Ltd

Address:

1 Morleys Mews
Beverley
HU17 9BY

That’s where the MP sent letter which was returned.