Voyeurmse: DCBLegal Autosec DelGrosso

Voyeurmse

Help please guys...
So I’ve sent SAR to PPC Autosec
Sent notice to DCBLegal 30 day extension

Advice on here said write to MP. I did... Diana Johnson as she raised the ex clamper rogue in parliament.  I got passed on to Graham Stuart as he’s my rep mp for area... I’ve received a reply asking for copies of everything.  

All fine but he asks... “who would I like him to raise it with ?”
I thought he would know!... so please advise guys?  Planning for signage?  BPA?  Management co?/Landowners (who were unhelpful).... 

A: is defence preparation the next stage?  Does this just contain facts 

B: can you explain witness statement?  Is this arguments put forward?

Advice gratefully received. 

Coupon-mad

I'd ask him to complain to the BPA, the DVLA, the Landowners and Del Grosso.

A: is defence preparation the next stage?  Does this just contain facts 

It contains what the Template Defence thread tells you.

B: can you explain witness statement?  Is this arguments put forward?

I've already explained it in the NEWBIES thread. Story of what happened plus exhibits.

Rodent3768

AutoSec will point you back to their website for details of the PCN which is a farce. They say they don't have any correspondence you might have sent to them. They won't respond to the SAR and will instead point you to DCB Legal. I'm going through it all too and may be a couple of weeks ahead of you.
Where did the alleged infraction take place?

D_P_Dance

Have you read this?


https://dianajohnson.co.uk/node/39


Have you complained to your MP

Coupon-mad

Have you looked at this week’s threads and seen that there’s only 3 weeks left to do this:

Government Consultation re private parking charge levels, August 2021: PLEASE BOOKMARK THIS THREAD — MoneySavingExpert Forum

We are calling for everyone to do a full and robust response by email to the MHCLG, attaching evidence of what happened to you and what you think is wrong about £100 charges and fake debt recovery ‘fees’ that no PPC actually incurs or pays. 

We also need people to contact their MP to ask questions about why the MHCLG appear to have performed a U-turn on their March promise to cap parking charges, and why instead they propose to fund the race to court at £70 a pop? 

Posters are being encouraged to ask their MPs to ask questions about why  PPCs have been allowed to persuade the MHCLG that they can add £70 per PCN for sending the same letters ParkingEye always do.  

That would be handing ParkingEye maybe £70m extra per annum from public pockets!  

Even where your PCN isn’t from that company (and pretty much all others do add the unrecoverable costs and all the ex clampers certainly do) I am sure you object as we do to this extortionate illegality!

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/78517562/#Comment_78517562

To anyone reading this: 

PLEASE DO THIS IF YOU WANT CONSUMER VOICES TO OUTWEIGH THE PARKING INDUSTRY’S GREED. WHICH SEES THEM TRY TO CLAIM MORE THAN THE LAW ALLOWS, FROM A REGISTERED KEEPER.

The proposals breach primary law!  I just looked at the POFA Explanatory Notes (part of the legislation):

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9/notes/division/5/1/3/3

221.Paragraph 4 provides that the creditor has a right to recover unpaid parking charges from the keeper of the relevant vehicle if the conditions set out in paragraphs 5, 6, 11 and 12 are satisfied. The creditor is not obliged to pursue unpaid parking charges through this scheme and may seek to do so through other means but they may not use the scheme provided for here to secure double recovery of unpaid parking charges (paragraph 4(6)), nor will they have the right to pursue the keeper, as opposed to the driver, of the vehicle where they have sufficient details of the driver’s identity. The right to reclaim unpaid parking charges from the vehicle keeper does not apply in cases where the vehicle has been stolen before it was parked, (paragraphs 4(2) to (3)), or in certain circumstances where the vehicle in question was a hire vehicle (paragraph 4(7)). The creditor may not make a claim against the keeper of a vehicle for more than the amount of the unpaid parking related charges as they stood when the notice to the driver was issued (paragraph 4(5)

Rodent3768

Another thing has made me think. I've read about required signatories for contracts. Are two directors required from both parties? If that's the case del Grosso has been the only director since July 2016.

Voyeurmse

Rodent3768 said:

AutoSec will point you back to their website for details of the PCN which is a farce. They say they don't have any correspondence you might have sent to them. They won't respond to the SAR and will instead point you to DCB Legal. I'm going through it all too and may be a couple of weeks ahead of you.
Where did the alleged infraction take place?

I sent both by post and requested reply by post.  If Autosec reply saying had nothing but what’s in payment page they’re lying. I kept proof of RM delivery signatures for appeal within deadline (no response.)  Also other correspondence, which they will deny receiving. 

I need to reply to Graham Stuart (MP) who has asked for photos of various items.   

BPA replied confirming they are no longer paid up members of the association.  They did however say he can still chase old PCN’s if they have address. 

Voyeurmse

It was a private carpark in Hull city centre.  

Voyeurmse

D_P_Dance said:

Have you read this?


https://dianajohnson.co.uk/node/39


Have you complained to your MP

It says no longer available.  

D_P_Dance

Works for me, are you using a 'phone?

Voyeurmse

D_P_Dance said:

Works for me, are you using a 'phone?

Yes. I’ve never needed nor wanted a computer or printer.   

I’ve ordered a Laptop, should arrive tomorrow.  Don’t judge me!   Maybe I need to add it to a counterclaim hehe.