We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Stoke Abbot Road - OPS - Gladstones
Comments
-
Thanks both, it would interesting to see what happens. Firstly to see if/when they respond since they are already running out of time I believe, but secondly the counter argument could reasonably be that there won't be a court case, since they've been instructed to close the case already. I accept it's debatable but I'm interested to see where that goes and what peoples views are. My view is that there are now four separate entities holding this data, all of whom are questionable and pose a data breach risk. None should be entitled to do so since not only was there no justification in the first place, but there is no realistic prospect of it being used again due to the above.KeithP said:One of the reasons for not deleting data when asked could reasonably be "we keep it for up to six years following the event in case a court case takes place".
I'd like to do a little experiment as well in relation to SARs, but that will have to wait...{Signature removed by Forum Team - if you are not sure why we have removed your signature, it's probably Gladstones}0 -
Hey all, I'm interested to understand what peoples views are on this from legal perspective and who is resposible/liable etc...
Everyones favourite parking company have responded to advise that they will be deleting my data in the next seven days. This is fine, but I also asked them to ensure that all three third parties they shared it with, also delete it (or at least they request them to do so). They've told me I will have to contact them myself instead. I don't particularly want to, since I wasn't the one handing out my details to every Tom Richard or Harry. In short, if they don't do it, can I report them (or more)?{Signature removed by Forum Team - if you are not sure why we have removed your signature, it's probably Gladstones}0 -
3
-
I did suspect this might be the case but wasn't sure where to look. Thank you very much. I needed something to keep me interested ever since they dropped their case against me. I'm rather enjoying all of this...Castle said:{Signature removed by Forum Team - if you are not sure why we have removed your signature, it's probably Gladstones}0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards