We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
BITCOIN
Comments
-
I'd say that smaller/newer businesses would represent a higher risk level of a productive asset class. In that you could have a new business that aims to make profits from selling widgets that spectacularly fails because of an incompetent owner or a poor productaaj123 said:According to you, are shares in startups or non blue chips productive assets or not? Many of these do not have cashflows and expectation of them generating cashflows in future are also a kind of speculation.
In what sense do these qualify as investments for you given you cannot claim they will 'certainly work in any medium or long term'?
They're certainly more speculative yes, absolutely. Productive? Yes, arguably, as with all shares we're talking about future cash flows. It's just that there are far greater risks in those sorts of businesses that they'll be less productive than we'd hoped.
The difference is that some things - e.g bitcoin, gold - aren't in that game at all. They're not ever going to throw off profits as they're just not that sort of thing.
Re: "almost certainly working" ,I think needless to say, I am not trying to imply that owning shares in any individual random startup is lower risk than holding Bitcoin/Gold.
What I mean is that there are in existence productive assets you can hold that will almost certainly work in the long term. The best examples being diversified market-tracking funds and high quality Govt. bonds.
0 -
I'm honestly not sure what this post is in relation to. Unless it was deleted I haven't seen any recent references to non-bitcoin crypto.adindas said:Oh Bitcoin haters. Learn the lesson .....There are bitcoin, there is also shitcoin.Do not just listen to random people on the internet, just because they are vocal and get cheering up by the same group of people. DYOR and make your own decision ...
0 -
I am not sure what you have started arguing about now. You are just saying that diversified equity will produce returns in the long run. Okay but who said we were disagreeing on that. And the truth of this statement does nothing to show that Bitcoin isn't a great investment at this point due to other reasons. Cashflows (denominated in fiat) are not the be all and end all of what makes an asset valuable and a good investment.
Why are you giving a pro-shares argument as if it's equivalent to an anti-bitcoin argument? You know, portfolios can have allocations to instruments with varying characteristics and investment thesis?0 -
Had to check myself frankly, it's been a while! :-) ... I was just responding to your question.I am not sure what you have started arguing about now.aaj123 said:As a shareholder, you don't get supplied tankers of fuel to your home. You as a shareholder can only profit from dividends or price increase. Your 'added value' is just play of language. On what basis do you say something 'adds value' while other things even if they do are 'shuffle of poker chips'? I could just as well say exchange of fiat paper for fossil fuel is exchanging two poker chips...So no particular comment in this instance about the overall virtues of BTC or otherwise, just differentiating between productive/non-productive assets and why it's an important (but indeed not the only) factor.
0 -
Qyburn said:That's great for people who bought during this year's low (yourself?). Not so good for people already holding the coin and suffering the loss. But I guess without those, there's nothing to fund your gain.
And? What about people that bought Tesla at the top, or WeWork, or a million other assets?
The market determines the gain, just like equities. I don't get why people get so fascinated with me or other holders needing people to buy from us, inferring it's some ponzi, I guess.
I've been buying for 6 years at hundreds of different prices. $19k when I first discovered it in 2017. $4k in the first major bear after that. $3k at Covid crash, $60k near the top and all the way down from there.
I believe in the asset class itself so will always buy and hold BTC & ETH. Yep there's a lot of noise, hype, scams and everything else you can imagine but I like it that way. High risk, potentially high reward0 -
Hi everyone , just wondering everyone’s predicted prices for bitcoin by 20250
-
£3 to £3.50 or therabouts16 Panel (250W JASolar) 4kWp, facing 170 degrees, 40 degree slope, Solis Inverter. Installed 29/9/2015 - £4700 (Norfolk Solar Together Scheme); 9.6kWh US2000C Pylontech batteries + Solis Inverter installed 12/4/2022 Year target (PVGIS-CMSAF) = 3880kWh - Installer estimate 3452 kWh:Average over 6 years = 4400 :j11
-
This forum would do well to educate themselves about Bitcoin and blockchain. What better than this course at MIT that was run by none other than current SEC chair Gary Gensler. I take it you will agree its unlikely this man would be teaching about ponzis and poker chips?
0 -
Halvening next year (May?) So I'd expect a run up end of this year.
By 2025, who knows but higher than now imo, NFA0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


