We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
My dad has been scammed out of £19,000
Options
Comments
-
colsten said:Yahoo_Mail said:colsten said:sheramber said:If they only changed the sort code as stated it is quite a coincidence that the account number for the new sort code was the same as the account number already held for the original sort code.
What can be changed is the Reference, which in some cases (e.g. NS&I, RCI, some Building Societies and Credit Unions) would direct the payment to a different account. Thus people have asked what the sort code of the "old" payee is / who the that "old" payee is.- Online: it asks me to confirm with the card reader. I didn't proceed as I don't have the card & the reader on me right now
- App: went through fine but only because the amount was less than £1,000.
0 -
Yahoo_Mail said:colsten said:Yahoo_Mail said:colsten said:sheramber said:If they only changed the sort code as stated it is quite a coincidence that the account number for the new sort code was the same as the account number already held for the original sort code.
What can be changed is the Reference, which in some cases (e.g. NS&I, RCI, some Building Societies and Credit Unions) would direct the payment to a different account. Thus people have asked what the sort code of the "old" payee is / who the that "old" payee is.- Online: it asks me to confirm with the card reader. I didn't proceed as I don't have the card & the reader on me right now
- App: went through fine but only because the amount was less than £1,000.
0 -
.......0 -
colsten said:Yahoo_Mail said:colsten said:Yahoo_Mail said:colsten said:sheramber said:If they only changed the sort code as stated it is quite a coincidence that the account number for the new sort code was the same as the account number already held for the original sort code.
What can be changed is the Reference, which in some cases (e.g. NS&I, RCI, some Building Societies and Credit Unions) would direct the payment to a different account. Thus people have asked what the sort code of the "old" payee is / who the that "old" payee is.- Online: it asks me to confirm with the card reader. I didn't proceed as I don't have the card & the reader on me right now
- App: went through fine but only because the amount was less than £1,000.
0 -
............0 -
Spoken to NatWest again today to ask for an update. Turns out the case wasn’t raised properly yesterday by their team so it’s 24 hours lost but in a way it adds another string to our bow for a refund.
With all due respect to people on here saying my dad may not be telling the truth out of embarrassment etc I can assure you I know my dad better than anyone and that everything I have said is what has happened.
Stressed to the guys on the phone again today that the card reader wasn’t used and I asked how it was possible that a payee details be changed without that, he simply said the investigation team would look into this.
We’ve been told we will have an answer by next Wednesday so we’ve got to hang tight now.I find it staggering how so many people can get scammed and I’ve warned my dad (who is 79) time and time again about this, but these !!!!!! pray on the elderly and can manipulate them in such a way that any logical thinking can go out the window.I’ve done untold amount of reading on this and it seems a refund boils down to whether the customer is negligent. Who defines the negligence? Anyone scammed is negligent to a degree.
Facts are my dad didn’t give his password or pin and nor did he use his card reader. What he has done is allowed team viewer to be installed and then allowed the scammer to take control and manipulated my dad into logging into his bank account whilst he was connected via team viewer.
Got to sit and hope now for positive outcome.1 -
colsten said:
............0 -
AWOL84 said:I’ve done untold amount of reading on this and it seems a refund boils down to whether the customer is negligent. Who defines the negligence? Anyone scammed is negligent to a degree.Facts are my dad didn’t give his password or pin and nor did he use his card reader. What he has done is allowed team viewer to be installed and then allowed the scammer to take control and manipulated my dad into logging into his bank account whilst he was connected via team viewer.
A number of similarities with your situation, apparently with a happy ending once escalated to the ombudsman, albeit this was also greeted with further scepticism....0 -
colsten said:@AWOL84 You have still not told us what the sort code, or the bank/BS/etc, is the payment went to. Or who the "old" payee is which was apparently used. Can your Father remember what he changed the Reference to?The payee name that was updated was an old payee who my dad sent a small figure to back in November last year.
Dad didn’t make any changes. Once they had access via team viewer they’ve done whatever it was that was necessary to complete the transaction.
I know it’s a ridiculously stupid thing he has done but at 79 with the threats he received about his account he was simply manipulated by these people who prey on the likes of him.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards