We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Planning Application - Neighbour Taking Photographs without Permission
Comments
-
I assume these images are merely there online for others to view As opposed to being online to buy?
Is your neighbour into photography and are there other photographs of a similar ilke from other properties online?
Have you asked why they have done what they have done?
This could be simply an over enthusiastic photographer taking photos for a local club who may have innocently overstepped the mark.
Are the pictures carefully framed to show detail or shadows etc Or just someone poking their nose into a building and taking pictures without 'thinking'?May you find your sister soon Helli.
Sleep well.0 -
I assume the photos have taken specifically for the purpose of the planning objection, to illustrate whatever it is they're talking about. It's fairly common for objectors to want to show something which they feel has been omitted from the application, or incorrect.TripleH said:I assume these images are merely there online for others to view As opposed to being online to buy?
Is your neighbour into photography and are there other photographs of a similar ilke from other properties online?
Have you asked why they have done what they have done?
This could be simply an over enthusiastic photographer taking photos for a local club who may have innocently overstepped the mark.2 -
However this is permitted development and under the legal framework, unless there is a specific point to highlight under the list iv given then permission will automatically be granted in 60 days.davidmcn said:
I assume the photos have taken specifically for the purpose of the planning objection, to illustrate whatever it is they're talking about. It's fairly common for objectors to want to show something which they feel has been omitted from the application, or incorrect.TripleH said:I assume these images are merely there online for others to view As opposed to being online to buy?
Is your neighbour into photography and are there other photographs of a similar ilke from other properties online?
Have you asked why they have done what they have done?
This could be simply an over enthusiastic photographer taking photos for a local club who may have innocently overstepped the mark.
Obtaining photos through trespass is acting unlawful and the council would have a duty to remove them unless they have relevance to an objection.0 -
Under any particular legal principle? Even if you have no right to be on the property, I can't see how anything necessarily flows through to what use you can make of photos which you took while you were there.snowcat75 said:
Obtaining photos through trespass is acting unlawful and the council would have a duty to remove them unless they have relevance to an objection.davidmcn said:
I assume the photos have taken specifically for the purpose of the planning objection, to illustrate whatever it is they're talking about. It's fairly common for objectors to want to show something which they feel has been omitted from the application, or incorrect.TripleH said:I assume these images are merely there online for others to view As opposed to being online to buy?
Is your neighbour into photography and are there other photographs of a similar ilke from other properties online?
Have you asked why they have done what they have done?
This could be simply an over enthusiastic photographer taking photos for a local club who may have innocently overstepped the mark.
I agree though that simply asking the council to remove the pictures from the online portal is probably the simplest solution - they do tend to redact information which might affect e.g. security.0 -
Dear All,
Thank you so much for all your helpful & thought provoking comments. We have spoken to the police who had indeed confirmed he has broken the law, but that it is a civil matter. We have therefore instructed a solicitor to write a letter requesting the pictures are taken down immediately & warning him that if he trespasses again we will be taking further action. We have since installed CCTV so as to warn any... 'uninvited guests' that may venture down the track towards the barn. Thanks again for all your suggestions. Fingers crossed this will resolve the matter.0 -
Taken down from where? I thought the problem was the council have put them up on the planning portal, in which case the neighbour doesn't really have any say in the matter.drumlinruby said:We have therefore instructed a solicitor to write a letter requesting the pictures are taken down immediately
0 -
Hannimal said:It's really concerning if this is legal. If it is, what would stop someone from taking pictures of your home when you're not there? I don't know the law around this but I'd seek some help from a professional at this point. It should be a breach of privacy.There is no right of privacy if you can be seen from another space. I'm sure your home is on Google Maps or Google Earth for example.If the photographer trespassed onto your land to take the photos that could be invasion of privacy. If you take a photo of a neighbours house from the street then that's fine and perfectly legal to do.Likewise if someone takes your photo when you're in a public space. You have no right to stop them.
0 -
No. You could sue for trespass. If insurance increased due to 'security issues' that would suggest the property wasn't adequately protected and probably in breach of the insurers requirements (i.e. no locks on doors or windows etc). In that case you should be thanking the other party for bringing it to your attention.Mickey666 said:if someone trespasses to take photos not visible from a public space and then posts them onto a public forum such that the owners insurance increases due to security issues, would the owner then be able to sue for damages, ie the increased insurance cost?
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


