We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Who should inherit my house?
Comments
- 
            
 Thank you - I appreciate that. As you say, we are boyfriend and girlfriend rather than being engaged or married. He is also clear that if/when we get married the situation would change and I would be left his share of the house. I don’t doubt his commitment to me at all - he is simply struggling with what to do with a well-meaning but controlling parent.princeofpounds said:I can see this both ways. You are a 'partner', but what that means is that you are boyfriend and girlfriend who have bought a property together as tenants-in-common.
 Any further commitment is entirely at the discretion of both of you - you are not married or civil partners, you have no dependants. He can choose to leave his money to you, his parents, or the local cats home.
 Whilst I could make disparaging comments about his commitment level in refusing to make you a beneficiary of his will, I have no idea about your relationship, and I can also imagine situations where I would want to do the same as him. One example might be if I had nieces and nephews struggling to make ends meet, whilst your only relative was a rich father who could back up your lifestyle and would inherit if you too passed on in turn before he did.
 OK, that's a rather contorted example, but I only make it to show that we should not rush to decisive judgement when we know so little about the two of you.0
- 
            
 I should add that my parents (who are living in a lovely house mortgage-free but without the spare money that his family have) have absolutely no interest in his share or even my share of the house and are baffled why we don’t just leave the shares to each automatically.Hamilton24 said:
 Thank you - I appreciate that. As you say, we are boyfriend and girlfriend rather than being engaged or married. He is also clear that if/when we get married the situation would change and I would be left his share of the house. I don’t doubt his commitment to me at all - he is simply struggling with what to do with a well-meaning but controlling parent.princeofpounds said:I can see this both ways. You are a 'partner', but what that means is that you are boyfriend and girlfriend who have bought a property together as tenants-in-common.
 Any further commitment is entirely at the discretion of both of you - you are not married or civil partners, you have no dependants. He can choose to leave his money to you, his parents, or the local cats home.
 Whilst I could make disparaging comments about his commitment level in refusing to make you a beneficiary of his will, I have no idea about your relationship, and I can also imagine situations where I would want to do the same as him. One example might be if I had nieces and nephews struggling to make ends meet, whilst your only relative was a rich father who could back up your lifestyle and would inherit if you too passed on in turn before he did.
 OK, that's a rather contorted example, but I only make it to show that we should not rush to decisive judgement when we know so little about the two of you.3
- 
            I suppose the question he could ask himself is, if anything does happen to him then at that point whose need will be greater? In the majority of cases, that'd be you.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
 
 Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.2
- 
            
 Given his parents own several properties and I only have my share in this one property, that would absolutely be me! I like this argument!elsien said:I suppose the question he could ask himself is, if anything does happen to him then at that point whose need will be greater? In the majority of cases, that'd be you.0
- 
            
 I have an older sister and brother, it hasn't crossed my mind to include them in my will.Hamilton24 said:Totally agree with all of this! He seems to be worried that his dad will cut him off (financially and emotionally) if he leaves his share of the house to me rather than them and doesn’t want to lose his relationship with his dad. He seems to feel that the money belongs in his family so his parents would be annoyed if I ended up with it.
 0
- 
            
 Ah, so it's just a gift from the father.Hamilton24 said:
 Sorry - I’m probably wording it badly! The money was left to his father by his grandfather when his grandfather died but his dad would be leaving the money to my partner anyway upon his (the dad’s) death so gave him the money early (after the grandfather died but before the dad died) so he could use it to buy his flat.AdrianC said:
 I'm not quite sure what this bit means - could you clarify?Hamilton24 said:(this money was inheritance from his grandfather but given to him early so he could buy the flat)
 It's only an "early inheritance" if his grandfather's still alive.
 Or was it left in a trust until he reached a certain age?1
- 
            
 Yes, it’s just a gift.AdrianC said:
 Ah, so it's just a gift from the father.Hamilton24 said:
 Sorry - I’m probably wording it badly! The money was left to his father by his grandfather when his grandfather died but his dad would be leaving the money to my partner anyway upon his (the dad’s) death so gave him the money early (after the grandfather died but before the dad died) so he could use it to buy his flat.AdrianC said:
 I'm not quite sure what this bit means - could you clarify?Hamilton24 said:(this money was inheritance from his grandfather but given to him early so he could buy the flat)
 It's only an "early inheritance" if his grandfather's still alive.
 Or was it left in a trust until he reached a certain age?0
- 
            
 No, it's a gift with emotional strings...Hamilton24 said:
 Yes, it’s just a gift.AdrianC said:
 Ah, so it's just a gift from the father.Hamilton24 said:
 Sorry - I’m probably wording it badly! The money was left to his father by his grandfather when his grandfather died but his dad would be leaving the money to my partner anyway upon his (the dad’s) death so gave him the money early (after the grandfather died but before the dad died) so he could use it to buy his flat.AdrianC said:
 I'm not quite sure what this bit means - could you clarify?Hamilton24 said:(this money was inheritance from his grandfather but given to him early so he could buy the flat)
 It's only an "early inheritance" if his grandfather's still alive.
 Or was it left in a trust until he reached a certain age?
 5
- 
            Hamilton24 said:The declaration of trust means he has 70% and I have 30% so that if we were to break up, we’d evenly split what we paid off the mortgage (we’re paying the mortgage off 50/50) and then divide the rest of the profits 70/30 but that’s only if we were to break up and then sell the house. We pay the mortgage 50/50 and we pay all house expenses, furniture etc. 50/50. I’d just assumed (stupidly it seems!) that if anything were to happen to either one of us we’d leave the house to the other. We are tenants in common as we’re not married but have a joint mortgage etc. I certainly had planned to leave my share of the house to my partner and still intend to do so.
 Joint or TIC only really matters for survivorship, you can still have a trust deed with joint tenants that specifies beneficial ownership that creates a debt to the estate when you die
 Back to the trust deed this looks like another one that has got it wrong for equity shares.
 Without real number I can only use an example.
 Only getting back what you have paid off the mortgage is the first thing that is wrong that mortgage bought a share of the house you should get back that share less the share of the outstanding mortgage.
 Say the mortgage was 50%(25% each) of the total and the house price doubled you would only get back the original mortgage amount which is now 12.5% you should still get 25%
 The other bit looks like you had 30% of the deposit he had 70%.
 eg. lets go with £200k house £100k mortgage £70k him £30k you
 You should own £80k and him £120k at the start that's 40% 60%
 house double paid off the mortgage you should get £160k he gets £240k
 with your agreement you get £140k £260k
 if the deposit £50k mortgage was £150k you should own £75k+£15k=£90k worth 45% him 55%
 double mortgage paid off you should get £180k agreement you get £150k1
- 
            I suspect the parents regard that ‘gift’ as family money. OP is not regarded as family.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
         
 
          
          
          
         