Received 15 parking tickets, now pursued by BW Legal

nosferatu1001

No, because it doesnt seem to help in this particular case

Umkomaas

Itachi2kg said:

Umkomaas said:

Another poster steered towards a wild goose chase?

Hi, so you don't think what others have reccomended is a good idea?

It was in relation to the advice about the Housing Act, which you seem to have followed to the point where you swiftly hit the buffers, returning for more advice, which pointed you to some landlord forum. Did you then go to that forum? 

Do you believe the HA and landlord advice was helpful in the context of your 15 tickets?

Itachi2kg

Umkomaas said:

Itachi2kg said:

Umkomaas said:

Another poster steered towards a wild goose chase?

Hi, so you don't think what others have reccomended is a good idea?

It was in relation to the advice about the Housing Act, which you seem to have followed to the point where you swiftly hit the buffers, returning for more advice, which pointed you to some landlord forum. Did you then go to that forum? 

Do you believe the HA and landlord advice was helpful in the context of your 15 tickets?

I agree, thats why I questioned it, but I believe others are trying to help me with this situation 

D_P_Dance

I rather fear that umko is referring to me.  He seems to think that anything not connected with private parking matters is irrelevent.  IIMU that he was an accountant or auditor, and that, in such professions, original thought is not encouraged.  On the other hand, I was in HM Diplomatic Service where all intelligence was valued.

https://www.google.com/search?q=nonty+python+accountant+sketch&oq=nonty+python+accountant+sketch&aqs=chrome..69i57.33716j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

nosferatu1001

Your understanding of both professions is woefully misguided. 

Umkomaas

IIMU that he was an accountant or auditor, and that, in such professions, original thought is not encouraged. 

I was neither, so your understanding is quite wrong!  And for the record, I too have advised many Government Departments and Ministers of State. But I prefer to play my cards somewhat closer to my chest. 🤫

MistyZ

Itachi2kg said:

I agree, thats why I questioned it, but I believe others are trying to help me with this situation 

Everyone's tried to help it's just that some of us think the HA thing isn't relevant.  

You've had loads of input from C-m.  A quick read suggests to me that she's pretty much incorporated all the other good advice on this thread plus she's damn good.  Just go with it. 

Itachi2kg

I believe this post is turning towards a direction which is not needed nor intended. Thank you for everyone who has replied, I have followed coupon mads' advice and sent BW legal a letter, I will update this post with the reply I receive 

Itachi2kg

After writing to BW Legal and mentioning the dispute and reminding them about cause of action estoppel, they have wrote back to me claiming that their clients' (Britannia Parking) cause of action is that I breached the terms of the contract by entering the car park. They are also telling me that estoppel is irrelevant because the PCNs represent multiple contraventions and that I should pay them.
Any advice on my next steps would be much appreciated 

beamerguy

BWLegal think everything is irrelevant just as the courts think they are irrelevant and then spank them.  . The letters we see from them are generally full of nonsensical rubbish

Abuse of process normally kills them off in court