Sunday Times Article - One Parking Solution

Jenni_D

Whilst everything posted recently may be factual, I think we need to be careful that any commentary doesn't veer towards character assassination of the said HHJ.

beamerguy

Jenni_D said:

Whilst everything posted recently may be factual, I think we need to be careful that any commentary doesn't veer towards character assassination of the said HHJ.

It is already in the public domain for anyone to see

Snakes_Belly

Jenni_D said:

Whilst everything posted recently may be factual, I think we need to be careful that any commentary doesn't veer towards character assassination of the said HHJ.

I think that it is the frustration of the unfairness of this case coming out.  There is no remedy to this scenario without potentially risking further costs.

 

D_P_Dance

At some point, someone, an MP perhaps, wilkl ask awkward questions about this decision.  The best thing we can do it keep it  up there with Ollie Robinson.   

DontWorryBeHappy27

Jenni_D said:

Whilst everything posted recently may be factual, I think we need to be careful that any commentary doesn't veer towards character assassination of the said HHJ.

Jenni D is right, I know we are all really unhappy about the Judgement of HHJ , but it is really important we temper our words. I don't know what they did , but they were banned a week ago. 33 thousand posts too.

beamerguy

DontWorryBeHappy27 said:

Jenni_D said:

Whilst everything posted recently may be factual, I think we need to be careful that any commentary doesn't veer towards character assassination of the said HHJ.

Jenni D is right, I know we are all really unhappy about the Judgement of HHJ , but it is really important we temper our words. I don't know what umkomaas did , but they were banned a week ago. 33 thousand posts too.

That is a great shame ..... you do know that you are not supposed to talk about members who have been banned

Half_way

If landowner authority isnt required, then I can set up in a field somewhere, lets say near a beach/popular area and run an ad hoc car park.
lets say £2.50 upto 1pm and £5 all day.
Ive been involved with event car parks/parking in grass fields before so I can easily get access to high vis jackets, two way radios, pay/money  pouches, tickets to give to motorists ( ie paid for parking) and  some signs.
And instead of it going towards some charity as is the usual method, it can go to pocket.
It's surprising how much an operation like that can take.

Snakes_Belly

Litigants should have a right for their case to be heard by a judge with the level of expertise that is appropriate to their case.  That does not always happen and why it is a lottery.

I don't want to see decisions such as the criteria based decisions of the IAS however in a hearing the judge should have knowledge of the specific areas of law and be able to apply that knowledge. 

D_P_Dance

Whatever anyone else may say or think, judges are accountable,  

https://www.theguardian.com/books/constance-briscoe

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/judge-jailed-over-800000-theft-9707741

https://news.sky.com/story/high-court-judge-fined-and-given-six-penalty-points-for-using-mobile-phone-whilst-driving-12242891

Fruitcake

If landowner authority isn't required, I could park a burger van at OPS's registered office and sell "food", or park a banger and sell car parts.