We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Should I just pay? (BW Legal - Intent to Proceed after defence submitted)
Options
Comments
-
Widdz22 said:Sorry to add to this thread.
I'm in a pickle about what to do.
I've recieved a letter from the rodents (bwlegal) from a ticket I had in August 2016. Only just heard from them now for some reason. From what I have been reading am I right in thinking that the £60 debt recovery fee is unjust and that if they take me to court this will get thrown out because of this?? The original ticket was for expired ticket in the hospital as my son's appointment over ran. Car park managed by ntc (norfolk traffic control).
Thanks
No, it won't be struck out due to added £60. You will likely win though, and no-one pays £60 unless they don't know how to defend that point. Which you will...PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Well, talk about taking your eye off the ball. I completely forgot about this and now I have about 10 days till court. Sorry I stopped contributing to this thread. I'm sure I'll be ok but if anyone has any last minute advice, guidance on what I need to do to prepare for my day in court (even though it's being done over the phone)?0
-
Have tiny fully complied with every order from the court? Can you prove it?3
-
nosferatu1001 said:Have tiny fully complied with every order from the court? Can you prove it?
Good point though ... the OP should read again all court orders received to ensure that all requirements have been met. One such requirement is possibly about a combined bundle, whereby the Claimant is likely liable for submitting this to the court and copying to the Defendant. (If this is the case then the OP will need to carefully check the combined bundle to ensure it has all their defence/WS included, and that it has not been doctored in any way - such as printing and scanning photos/images to degrade their quality).2 -
Have you, was the meaning there lol
indeed. Double check all orders. No assumptions, unless an order explicitly is overrides then it is live and must be complied with.2 -
Alfie_79 said:Well, talk about taking your eye off the ball. I completely forgot about this and now I have about 10 days till court. Sorry I stopped contributing to this thread. I'm sure I'll be ok but if anyone has any last minute advice, guidance on what I need to do to prepare for my day in court (even though it's being done over the phone)?1
-
Alfie_79 said:Well, talk about taking your eye off the ball. I completely forgot about this and now I have about 10 days till court. Sorry I stopped contributing to this thread. I'm sure I'll be ok but if anyone has any last minute advice, guidance on what I need to do to prepare for my day in court (even though it's being done over the phone)?
So, the facts are that you won, then BWL appealed because they got the hump because it was struck out for Abuse of process and we did not get the chance to show the court that the Britannia pictures they sent as evidence were doctored Those pictures are shown on this thread
We also know that the doctored pictures hide the true entity of Britannia for the pub.
So, what have you done with only 10 days left ??????? this is serious
1 -
So, the facts are that you won, then BWL appealed because they got the hump because it was struck out for Abuse of process and we did not get the chance to show the court that the Britannia pictures they sent as evidence were doctored Those pictures are shown on this threadWe also know that the doctored pictures hide the true entity of Britannia for the pub.
So, what have you done with only 10 days left ??????? this is serious1 -
Alfie_79 said:So, the facts are that you won, then BWL appealed because they got the hump because it was struck out for Abuse of process and we did not get the chance to show the court that the Britannia pictures they sent as evidence were doctored Those pictures are shown on this threadWe also know that the doctored pictures hide the true entity of Britannia for the pub.
So, what have you done with only 10 days left ??????? this is serious1 -
Le_Kirk said:Alfie_79 said:So, the facts are that you won, then BWL appealed because they got the hump because it was struck out for Abuse of process and we did not get the chance to show the court that the Britannia pictures they sent as evidence were doctored Those pictures are shown on this threadWe also know that the doctored pictures hide the true entity of Britannia for the pub.
So, what have you done with only 10 days left ??????? this is serious1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards