Bwlegal & UK Parking Patrol LTD Altering Documents please help

Bilbo_Baz

I've given up. 
That's good to hear about Coupon Mad I thought she had had enough of me lol would not hold it against her I know I  can be stubborn and hard work.
No she  not just diving in  last night she printed of the 60 add on defense off here and the Southampton Judgment said she will contact the court this week and try to tidy things up and get rid of all my dead wood but we still need time to go through it all properly. bonus is she has some court experience helping friends  that I did not know about ! and she wants to get involved her younger sister now has a parking charge notice over Teddington way Asda car park you have to spend at least £50.00 to get free parking  so she has the 2 parking charge notices total 100 and the 60 add on so we can have a go at this one and get off on the right footing.
Youngest Daughter has a Private Parking CCJ so she is going to try have that set aside
I can not believe the amount of paper I have just from BW and I have not printed all the e mails yet wow they are not making money on this one even if they win on the day
The amount of time  LOL
So once she is up to speed I am sure she will help out on here  and Lay rep to get more court experience

Bilbo_Baz

Can any one help with this 
Do the solicitors who attend court for the claimants have to work directly ie be an associate or Partner of the company IE if BW Legal are pursuing the case than any one attending has to work for the company and not be freelance I think I read on another website they do so as to be accountable for any disciplinary action if needs be after any case. is this true ? 

KeithP

Bilbo_Baz said:

Can any one help with this 
Do the solicitors who attend court for the claimants have to work directly ie be an associate or Partner of the company IE if BW Legal are pursuing the case than any one attending has to work for the company and not be freelance I think I read on another website they do so as to be accountable for any disciplinary action if needs be after any case. is this true ? 

No. You are mistaken.

Without exception, the advocate representing the Claimant in every case we see on this forum is not an employee of the Claimant or their solicitors.

Umkomaas

I think I read on another website they do so as to be accountable for any disciplinary action if needs be after any case.

Let's see it then.

Bilbo_Baz

Have a look on Parking Cowboys web site I think I read it on there 

Umkomaas

Bilbo_Baz said:

Have a look on Parking Cowboys web site I think I read it on there 

Nah!  If you can't be bothered to find and link it, I can't be either. You were asking the question!

Bilbo_Baz said:

Can any one help with this 
Do the solicitors who attend court for the claimants have to work directly ie be an associate or Partner of the company IE if BW Legal are pursuing the case than any one attending has to work for the company and not be freelance I think I read on another website they do so as to be accountable for any disciplinary action if needs be after any case. is this true ? 

Bilbo_Baz

I will also try find it again on The Parking Cowboys website  ie if the claimant is not in court and sends a solicitor who has passed the bar ie it has to be  someone from BW legal in this case, if they do not send some one who is directly employed by BW then then I am sure the site said one can challenge the right of Audience and said some thing about disciplinary procedures if some thing goes wrong by sub contracting the claim to another third party this is hard to do as BW Legal for instance could refuse to accept lability say misconduct  for a third party who is not employed by them.
Or they would they have to have a signed contract to give a third party solicitor the Right of Audience ? and then would the defense not have the right to see any such contract ? before the hearing ?
 I do not know if this is correct but worth looking into  or not ?



 

KeithP

Bilbo_Baz said:

I will also try find it again on The Parking Cowboys website  ie if the claimant is not in court and sends a solicitor who has passed the bar ie it has to be  someone from BW legal in this case, if they do not send some one who is directly employed by BW then then I am sure the site said one can challenge the right of Audience and said some thing about disciplinary procedures if some thing goes wrong by sub contracting the claim to another third party this is hard to do as BW Legal for instance could refuse to accept lability say misconduct  for a third party who is not employed by them.
Or they would they have to have a signed contract to give a third party solicitor the Right of Audience ? and then would the defense not have the right to see any such contract ? before the hearing ?
 I do not know if this is correct but worth looking into  or not ? 

Crikey!!

Have you unearthed something revolutionary?

Every day at hundreds of County Courts across the country there are Claimant's representatives chancing their arm.


Alternatively, perhaps it isn't worth looking into.

Umkomaas

RoA rules can be complex. We have rarely seen them being upheld in parking cases. If you manage to get the advocate 'kicked out', who do you think takes over the Claimant's case?

An unsuccessful request for the RoA of the advocate be denied, it's more than likely you will have pi.ssed off the Judge in the process. Not the best kind of start!

Le_Kirk

KeithP said:

Bilbo_Baz said:

I will also try find it again on The Parking Cowboys website  ie if the claimant is not in court and sends a solicitor who has passed the bar ie it has to be  someone from BW legal in this case, if they do not send some one who is directly employed by BW then then I am sure the site said one can challenge the right of Audience and said some thing about disciplinary procedures if some thing goes wrong by sub contracting the claim to another third party this is hard to do as BW Legal for instance could refuse to accept lability say misconduct  for a third party who is not employed by them.
Or they would they have to have a signed contract to give a third party solicitor the Right of Audience ? and then would the defense not have the right to see any such contract ? before the hearing ?
 I do not know if this is correct but worth looking into  or not ? 

Crikey!!
Have you unearthed something revolutionary?
Every day at hundreds of County Courts across the country there are Claimant's representatives chancing their arm.
Alternatively, perhaps it isn't worth looking into.

Blimy @keithP how did you ever understand that enough to be able to reply?