HX Parking Fine - Gladstone Letter Before Claim Recieved. Please Help a Stressed Out New Mum.

zhonguonuren

nosferatu1001 said:

It states that *hard copy* evidnece must be stored securelly. Do they have anything in hard copy? I doubt it. 

It states hard copies must be kept 

nosferatu1001

It state syou mujst keep it
Not that you must produce it in hardcopy in the first place. 
Be careful when parsing documents. Different meanings

zhonguonuren

I took the document to court and the DVLA’s barrister could only splutter so with all due respect I think my interpretation can be relied on here.  

Coupon-mad

Absolute legend, @zhonguonuren

ParkingNightmares

Thank you so much for all the advice so far, especially the information relating to them keeping hard copies. I will be interested to see if they can show any evidence they have this. The SAR is complete and my husband has emailed it across to the RK so they can email it to HX. I'm just finishing up the reply to Gladstone. I'm going to keep it simple for now as they don't really need to much information relating to the incident until they send a real letter before claim. Am I right in thinking that is the correct course of action?

zhonguonuren

Coupon-mad said:

Absolute legend, @zhonguonuren

Why thank you very much.  Praise indeed 
  

somethingveryfishy

@zhonguonuren
Speaking of HX's real address - they're keen to keep it quiet of course but they're in the The Elsie Whiteley Innovation Centre on Hopwood Lane in Halifax.
They had a flat (owned by Kenny I believe) that they used in the past to retrieve victims' info from the DVLA, that address is now listed on the non-domestic rates register.

zhonguonuren

ParkingNightmares said:

Thank you so much for all the advice so far, especially the information relating to them keeping hard copies. I will be interested to see if they can show any evidence they have this. The SAR is complete and my husband has emailed it across to the RK so they can email it to HX. I'm just finishing up the reply to Gladstone. I'm going to keep it simple for now as they don't really need to much information relating to the incident until they send a real letter before claim. Am I right in thinking that is the correct course of action?

This, from a regular,  looks the way to go OP (as you thought).

Respond denying the debt to Gladstones requiring them to suspend processing data for 30 days at least. 

nosferatu1001

zhonguonuren said:

I took the document to court and the DVLA’s barrister could only splutter so with all due respect I think my interpretation can be relied on here.  

With all due respect that's only when requesting info using the v888/3, a it clearly states. 

They don't use this form. They use the electronic KADOE link.  Your excerpt is worthless for the majority of ppc. 

V888/3 would normally be used by smaller companies without this link. 

D_P_Dance

Instead of feedig us juicy snippets in dribs and drabs Zhong, why not give us the whole story here. We may  able to use some of it.