We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Barclay's bank has placed false loan accounts in place of originals, paid commission and 20% tax
Comments
-
Page 8 is coming soon. Anyone yet understand what is going on?
edit: oh, it is now page 8I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.3 -
Ok, a large loan in 2006 with ppi on it, has been in affect removed and replaced by two bogus loan accounts within the dates if original loan, I've been paid commission on them, instead of the ppi on original account.
It's the difference of £300 or ppi of thousands, also it is illegal practice-1 -
I'm saying this on here so, people know what can go on in the background of banks, not what you would expect, bank messing around with there customers accounts.-1
-
Just got the most important letter of all off my bank, I've won my case. A big thank you to Martin Lewis and the MSE Team for all the help and advice 😀-1
-
ph55 said: I've won my case.Thanks for keeping the thread updated so often.3
-
Ok, is there anyone who can help, I had a lot of loans over the years, so back in the day i took out a health care insurance with my bank, the main selling point was it would cover me if I was off work due to illness, so I agreed to take policy on. Ok 1. would I have taken this policy out had I known that policy already running in the background????? 2. Should the bank have sold this policy to me knowing that ppi was already running in background, and also offered same cover ?????
This is my next complaint.-1 -
Health care insurance is not PPI.Good luck anyway.0
-
I know, but I'm thinking, I should get whole thing refunded as I did not need it, and bank should not have sold it knowing that ppi was covering for same ???-1
-
You don't say why you didn't need it and your PPI was not covering for same. It was covering for different.
And if you didn't need it, why did you buy it?
And did you know you've used 13 question marks across just five sentences? And only two of those sentences were actual questions. Did you mis-buy a pack of punctuation?3 -
All comments appreciated-1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards