I have received a letter from ELMS Legal?

nosferatu1001

CCJs , not CCs

1505grandad

"Thank you, I will post the complete WS on here including the grammatical corrections........"
Also  -  "judgements"?

D_P_Dance

Also  -  "judgements"?

If this is that bone of contention on here about whether the word takes an "e" or not, it does not matter.  Some say it does, and some say it does not.

FWIIW, my former  employer, The Foreign Office, favoured , nay insisted, that it was spelled with an "e".  I hope that there is no more dispute about this.  

1505grandad

I will leave it to the experts but should not the WS be consistent  -  i.e. title of WS says  "DEFAULT JUDGMENT"

Coupon-mad

Yes as long as it ends with this (it is June not July):

I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
Signed ...............................
Name  ...............................
Date: 8th June 2020   

Coupon-mad

You still have wilfully.  That is NOT the right word.  Remove it like the other poster did yeterday...

Coupon-mad

Yep, get it applied for. 

Can't promise the court will like one fee for 3 CCJs but the wording tries to overcome that on proportionality and 'cause of action estoppel' grounds - i.e. that it should have been one claim all along.

Coupon-mad

IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The default judgment dated [8th June 2020]

---

be set aside.

The above date is wrong.  There are 3 default CCJs and none of them were dated 8th June.

Le_Kirk

Notwithstanding what @Coupon-mad wrote, the rest of it looks like a standard six-point draft order.  You leave all other dates blank for the judge to complete.  If you want you could put DD/MM/YYYY.

Le_Kirk

IloveElephants said:

Coupon-mad said:

IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The default judgment dated [8th June 2020]

---

be set aside.

The above date is wrong.  There are 3 default CCJs and none of them were dated 8th June.

Thank you Coupon-Mad, yes it should read
T IS ORDERED that:
1. The default judgment dated  1st March 2019    12th January 2020     12th January 2020 

Shouldn't that be
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The default judgments dated 1st March 2019, 12th January 2020 &12th January 2020