Defence Advice please CASE STRUCK OUT

Coupon-mad

As we said, this is a preliminary matter to raise at the start of the hearing:

 ''Sir/Madam, I have not receive the Claimant's bundle or any evidence at all, and given this is in clear breach of the Orders and Directions of the court and has wasted this court's and my time with this hearing, I invite you to strike out the C's witness statement and evidence - even if the court has received it - and award my full costs for the unreasonable conduct of the Claimant''.

Please now make a real difference - A TASK FOR SEPTEMBER.

The Government is (this month only) consulting about a new statutory code of practice (CoP) and framework to rein in the rogue parking firms.  Read and comment on the draft CoP proposal and the enforcement framework consultation, and get everyone you know to do the same.

You will need to register to comment on the CoP and enter an occupation even if you are retired or a homemaker, but otherwise it is easy to navigate, and comment upon each section/subsection individually. You can save comments to edit later and or submit comments once you are happy with them.

https://standardsdevelopment.bsigroup.com/projects/2020-00193#/section

You do not need to register to comment on the enforcement framework which can be found here. It has a link on page 5 to make comments.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/913272/Code_Enforcement_Framework_consultation.pdf

At the very least, we say the parking charge level should be £50/£25 or higher level £70/£35, as per Council PCNs in E&W.  

And we say the added fake 'debt recovery' costs are just double counting the cost of letters, and MUST GO because that is unfair and illegal.

Please be heard.  You can bet the hundreds of PPCs will be commenting.

No apologies for repeating this vital 'call for action' to consumers, on every thread this month!

nosferatu1001

So you have their WS bundle, yes? 52 pages? So that is what you review, using the obvious searches on here to see just how much of teir template, copy and paste garbage has been dumped in and called a good 'un!

covid1956

Case struck out VCS did not provide Electronic Bundle to court or me, their agent caved when told this and said you might as well strike it out.
Pressed for costs but judge wasnt having any of it.
thanks to all for your help
COVID

Redx

Well done , another win against incompetent VCS

Another one bites the dust !!

beamerguy

covid1956 said:

Case struck out VCS did not provide Electronic Bundle to court or me, their agent caved when told this and said you might as well strike it out.
Pressed for costs but judge wasnt having any of it.
thanks to all for your help
COVID

Well done, the fire breathing VCS scuppered themselves ........ what a real joke they are

Le_Kirk

Well done.

Coupon-mad

covid1956 said:

Case struck out VCS did not provide Electronic Bundle to court or me, their agent caved when told this and said you might as well strike it out.
Pressed for costs but judge wasnt having any of it.
thanks to all for your help
COVID

Brilliant news!  ANOTHER VCS ONE BITES THE DUST!

Now, please please please make a difference and make sure that you reply with your own thoughts to the two Govt consultation documents.

nosferatu1001

Welld one - but not even costs for loss of pay orleave?

covid1956

nosferatu1001 said:

Welld one - but not even costs for loss of pay orleave?

No she would not give an inch, i did try
Covid

beamerguy

covid1956 said:

nosferatu1001 said:

Welld one - but not even costs for loss of pay orleave?

No she would not give an inch, i did try
Covid

Judge bingo, probably she was wearing a pointed hat, long black hair and her pu**sy under the table