Defence Advice please CASE STRUCK OUT

Fruitcake

A month ago I said,

Fruitcake said:

Does the scammer's WS include a copy of the alleged landowner contract? If so, please post it here.
In fact, please post the whole WS.

but sadly it is too late for you to include any comments we might have made had we seen your WS before you submitted it, unless you still have time to add a supplementary WS. 
It will still be worth you showing it to us though so you can make comments about it at your hearing.

covid1956

ELECTRONIC BUNDLE QUERY.
Is there a deadline for the claimant and defendant to submit their electronic bundle?
My bundle was submitted over 1 week ago, the telephone hearing is this week but i have not had a copy of the claimants EB
Covid

Redx

The deadline should be on the court order you both received , it's the same date for both sides

It's also something to be mentioned as a preliminary matter to the judge at the hearing

DoaM

And recheck who was supposed to submit the combined bundle .. it's usually the claimant but not always.

Have you sent a copy of your bundle to the court anyway as a backup? (It's not unknown for the claimant's solicitor to doctor the defendant's evidence to down-play the effectiveness of it ... e.g. print and then scan at a poor quality photos that the D had included).

nosferatu1001

Almost certainly it was supposed to be a combined bundle, C and D in one doc
So you should have been sent this, so you can check that all the documetns YOU sent them are included, exactly as presented, and also that their WS hasnt been altered in the meantime, from the version they sent you before. 

covid1956

Redx said:

The deadline should be on the court order you both received , it's the same date for both sides

It's also something to be mentioned as a preliminary matter to the judge at the hearing

No date on court order only "both parties to be provided with electronic bundle" so this could be interpreted as--- the court to be sent the bundle and then send a copy to the other side--- not my interpretation
Covid

covid1956

DoaM said:

And recheck who was supposed to submit the combined bundle .. it's usually the claimant but not always.

Have you sent a copy of your bundle to the court anyway as a backup? (It's not unknown for the claimant's solicitor to doctor the defendant's evidence to down-play the effectiveness of it ... e.g. print and then scan at a poor quality photos that the D had included).

Sent bundle to court and claimant, have confirmation of receipt from court
It's not unknown for the claimant's solicitor to doctor the defendant's evidence to down-play the effectiveness of it   my thoughts also, and have they added additional info to their original WS!!
So deadline query ? no one 100% sure
cOVID

covid1956

nosferatu1001 said:

Almost certainly it was supposed to be a combined bundle, C and D in one doc
So you should have been sent this, so you can check that all the documetns YOU sent them are included, exactly as presented, and also that their WS hasnt been altered in the meantime, from the version they sent you before. 

and also that their WS hasnt been altered in the meantime, from the version they sent you before. ---   That is my main fear as i may not have time to check the original, sent on 52 pages of a4 with the electronic version
So deadline no one 100% sure
COVID

nosferatu1001

You must check the first version! For crying out loud, thats why you have been sent a copy
You dont need to look at every detail surely? Given it is a template, and it will have been dissected previously?

covid1956

nosferatu1001 said:

You must check the first version! For crying out loud, thats why you have been sent a copy
You dont need to look at every detail surely? Given it is a template, and it will have been dissected previously?

First version!!! well at present its the only version.  I have no electric version of any of the claimants documents. I have their 52 page claim  nothing else
Covid