We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Court Claim form from VCS
Comments
-
chris0147 said:I have added that VCS sent me the letter in the post, they are abuse of process and added fake amount for debt collecting costs.
A) I have looking at the second link you sent me, I cant find in what paragrahs that I need to add in my defence as the signs you need to display permit to park but no permit is needed to park on a private land.I need to add that £60 was unlawful, the £60 is unenforceable and they have no proof of loss. If you can help me to find it to add them in these defence, that would be great.
C) In this paragraph, do I need to change it to IPC as the parking firm is a member of IPC and not on BPA?
D) e)The claimant company fully complied with their obligations within the British Parking Association Code of Practice of which they were member at the time.
If I need to make some changes or remove it please let me know.You have covered that
C) Follow the comment given by 1505grandad
D) As C)2 -
1505grandad said:e)The claimant company fully complied with their obligations within the British Parking Association Code of Practice of which they were member at the time.""
The claimant is a member of the IPC AOS0 -
Le_Kirk said:chris0147 said:I have added that VCS sent me the letter in the post, they are abuse of process and added fake amount for debt collecting costs.
A) I have looking at the second link you sent me, I cant find in what paragrahs that I need to add in my defence as the signs you need to display permit to park but no permit is needed to park on a private land.I need to add that £60 was unlawful, the £60 is unenforceable and they have no proof of loss. If you can help me to find it to add them in these defence, that would be great.
C) In this paragraph, do I need to change it to IPC as the parking firm is a member of IPC and not on BPA?
D) e)The claimant company fully complied with their obligations within the British Parking Association Code of Practice of which they were member at the time.
If I need to make some changes or remove it please let me know.You have covered that
C) Follow the comment given by 1505grandad
D) As C)
There is only 2 I have found so far:4. There can be no 'legitimate interest' in sending demands regarding the time taken to move students into Varley Park (university halls of residence) which reasonably will include the unloading of belongings from a vehicle over a period of days in October, then the same before the Christmas holidays. Students have residential rights which, even if there are not specific terms about parking in their rental agreements, would imply rights of way to move their possessions in and out. It seems that this Claimant knowingly sent an operative in October and in December to lurk at the site and prey on students and their families, waiting until they carried belongings inside the premises then pouncing and taking photos over a period of mere minutes, to profit from the normal conduct of moving into a home.10. The Claimant is put to strict proof that it has sufficient proprietary interest in the land, or that it has the necessary authorisation from the landowner to issue parking charge notices, and to pursue payment by means of litigation.
For the 4. paragraph, I need to make alot of changes as the car park is private and not for university so I need some help with making the changes.0 -
I told you to IGNORE anything about Varley Park, as you were not there, it was to be used as an example of style and format - just DO NOT use it. However, you do need paragraph 10 about landowner authority.1
-
I have already got the paragraph 10 in my defence. Please see in paragraph 12 in post #38.
Are there anymore I need to add?0 -
For the 4. paragraph, I need to make a lot of changes as the car park is private and not for university so I need some help with making the changes.No you don't need our help to write that - you write that bit!
All other posters I've pointed to use that defence as a base, just re-write the first points & facts themselves.
This is so simple, you have been shown a recent defence to copy and adapt - your job only involves adapting the first few points/facts. No-one is going to write YOUR facts about the location that only you know.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
Coupon-mad said:For the 4. paragraph, I need to make a lot of changes as the car park is private and not for university so I need some help with making the changes.No you don't need our help to write that - you write that bit!
All other posters I've pointed to use that defence as a base, just re-write the first points & facts themselves.
This is so simple, you have been shown a recent defence to copy and adapt - your job only involves adapting the first few points/facts. No-one is going to write YOUR facts about the location that only you know.
Come on, please help me. I am deaf and it is not my fault!0 -
We are helping you.
How does being deaf affect you adapting a defence by typing in your facts about the car park (genuine question).PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
Well it does affect me because I have got some learning difficulties so i don't know what to write and I am stuck with it.
The car park can be used for to park at the back of Iceland where it is a private land so you can go at Iceland for a quick shopping.
Here is what I am thinking about to adapting a defence but here is the first line:
There can be no 'legitimate interest' in sending demands regarding the car park at the back of Iceland which is a private land.
0 -
There can be no 'legitimate interest' in sending demands regarding the car park at the back of Iceland, when the driver was a customer of that shop. which is a private land.
How about the above? Is it true to say the person was visiting Iceland?
You also need to add to explain if it appeared to be free parking for customers and what made you think that.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards