We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
New "Have a Look at This" thread
Comments
-
Adverts apart I never like that site. If someone posts a link I immediately search the property on Rightmove.ProDave said:Obviously_the_best said:
Anyone else having trouble with Zoopla adverts? the page appears for about 3 seconds then goes blank. Firefox web browser.0 -
I know you meant property details.ProDave said:Patr100 said:
Fine on Chrome. Try disabling any pop up/ ad blockers.ProDave said:Obviously_the_best said:
Anyone else having trouble with Zoopla adverts? the page appears for about 3 seconds then goes blank. Firefox web browser.
Sorry when I said "advert" I meant I can't see property details, I don't give 2 hoots about any other advertising that may or may not be on the site. To me is just seems that Zooplas website is broken.
But sometimes blockers can interfere with other scripts on the webpage that deliver content.
1 -
Because that is a "brownfield" site and far better to use brownfield sites first, instead of destroying our countryside. Land is scarce and to accommodate the quantity of housing apparently required, developers have to build to a higher density. Decent size gardens in speculative suburban developments were at their peak from the 1930s to the1950s. Those days are long, long past.anotheruser said:
Why does it "cry out" for squeezed in houses that won't really be fit for 2+ cars each after a few years?lincroft1710 said:
Can't see that bungalow being extended or modernised. Whole site cries out to be redeveloped with a least 2 new housesRS2OOO said:
It could be a fantastic plot as it is for someone.
A bungalow near me has sold their garden and a company is building three houses in it. Access is stupidly tight, the houses look squashed in... almost like they wern't supposed to be there / obvious the developer is looking to cash in rather than produce quality homes.If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales4 -
Spot the cat. Also twice in walkthrough in grumpy mode https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/1192664875
-
Dandie89 said:Spot the cat. Also twice in walkthrough in grumpy mode https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/119266487
Cute
1 -
There is plenty of land, it's just that people are obsessed with the green belt.lincroft1710 said:
Because that is a "brownfield" site and far better to use brownfield sites first, instead of destroying our countryside. Land is scarce and to accommodate the quantity of housing apparently required, developers have to build to a higher density. Decent size gardens in speculative suburban developments were at their peak from the 1930s to the1950s. Those days are long, long past.anotheruser said:
Why does it "cry out" for squeezed in houses that won't really be fit for 2+ cars each after a few years?lincroft1710 said:
Can't see that bungalow being extended or modernised. Whole site cries out to be redeveloped with a least 2 new housesRS2OOO said:
It could be a fantastic plot as it is for someone.
A bungalow near me has sold their garden and a company is building three houses in it. Access is stupidly tight, the houses look squashed in... almost like they wern't supposed to be there / obvious the developer is looking to cash in rather than produce quality homes.
We should be building on it, there's far more than we need and most of it isn't particularly attractive or useful.0 -
I’m one of the people obsessed with the green belt. I’m sorry that I find it attractive.[Deleted User] said:
There is plenty of land, it's just that people are obsessed with the green belt.lincroft1710 said:
Because that is a "brownfield" site and far better to use brownfield sites first, instead of destroying our countryside. Land is scarce and to accommodate the quantity of housing apparently required, developers have to build to a higher density. Decent size gardens in speculative suburban developments were at their peak from the 1930s to the1950s. Those days are long, long past.anotheruser said:
Why does it "cry out" for squeezed in houses that won't really be fit for 2+ cars each after a few years?lincroft1710 said:
Can't see that bungalow being extended or modernised. Whole site cries out to be redeveloped with a least 2 new housesRS2OOO said:
It could be a fantastic plot as it is for someone.
A bungalow near me has sold their garden and a company is building three houses in it. Access is stupidly tight, the houses look squashed in... almost like they wern't supposed to be there / obvious the developer is looking to cash in rather than produce quality homes.
We should be building on it, there's far more than we need and most of it isn't particularly attractive or useful.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?8 -
Me too. Not sure it is just people obsessed with it I think wildlife is quite fond too even the stuff not all that attractive to look at. Re the "brownfield" site. I'm not sure but wasn't it decided that gardens in built up areas were not to be considered brownfield, only those in rural setting.GDB2222 said:
I’m one of the people obsessed with the green belt. I’m sorry that I find it attractive.[Deleted User] said:
There is plenty of land, it's just that people are obsessed with the green belt.lincroft1710 said:
Because that is a "brownfield" site and far better to use brownfield sites first, instead of destroying our countryside. Land is scarce and to accommodate the quantity of housing apparently required, developers have to build to a higher density. Decent size gardens in speculative suburban developments were at their peak from the 1930s to the1950s. Those days are long, long past.anotheruser said:
Why does it "cry out" for squeezed in houses that won't really be fit for 2+ cars each after a few years?lincroft1710 said:
Can't see that bungalow being extended or modernised. Whole site cries out to be redeveloped with a least 2 new housesRS2OOO said:
It could be a fantastic plot as it is for someone.
A bungalow near me has sold their garden and a company is building three houses in it. Access is stupidly tight, the houses look squashed in... almost like they wern't supposed to be there / obvious the developer is looking to cash in rather than produce quality homes.
We should be building on it, there's far more than we need and most of it isn't particularly attractive or useful.5 -
There's too much of it, and we can build nice sustainable houses on small parts of it that don't disrupt nature too much.
Or we can just defend every inch of it and watch as houses get even less affordable.1 -
You might need a couple of bottles of bleach if you buy this one:
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/119249894#/?channel=RES_BUY
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards




