We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
To all those on this forum that says speed doesn't kill
Options
Comments
-
https://news.sky.com/story/dashcam-footage-captures-motorcyclist-catapulted-through-air-after-horror-collision-11905785
According to the report, this guy only survived because he was wearing a suit with airbags.
The dashcam reads 66mph as he enters the bend (so his speedo probably read around 70mph) and it's due to the speed that he veers onto the other side of the road as he takes the bend.
Everyone should slow down (except the millions of drivers that pootle along at 40mph who should, for the love of god, speed up).
Too fast to stop in the distance that you can see to be clear is dangerous, and too fast for the circumstances is also dangerous.
Doing 180mph on a straight and empty piece of motorway in a car that is designed to do it, and is well maintained, is no danger at all.0 -
Driving like a !!!! seems to be the problem here, not speed. Interestingly no mention of the speed the bike was doing, looks like he was going at a fair lick too.0
-
I remember some time ago statistics that went something like this:
If a child runs out into the road and is hit by a car--
doing 20 or less the child will probably walk away.
doing 30 the child may have injuries but will probably survive
doing 40 the child may survive but will probably have life threatening injuries.0 -
knightstyle wrote: »I remember some time ago statistics that went something like this:
If a child runs out into the road and is hit by a car--
doing 20 or less the child will probably walk away.
doing 30 the child may have injuries but will probably survive
doing 40 the child may survive but will probably have life threatening injuries.0 -
For the hard of thinking, "Speed kills" isn't meant to be taken literally - after all we're all travelling around the centre of the galaxy at 500,000mph and it hasn't killed anyone yet. It is meant to be a convenient short-hand way of saying that, all other circumstances being equal, a higher speed increases the probability of an accident, and also increases the typical damage arising from any accident that occurs.
"Speed kills" trips of the tongue and is easy to remember; the full blown version, rather less so.
The same concept applies to many other admonitions and warnings. Best to understand them in the spirit in which they are meant rather than treating them as literal statements.0 -
It's the stopping that kills you......Life in the slow lane0
-
For the hard of thinking, "Speed kills" isn't meant to be taken literally - after all we're all travelling around the centre of the galaxy at 500,000mph and it hasn't killed anyone yet. It is meant to be a convenient short-hand way of saying that, all other circumstances being equal, a higher speed increases the probability of an accident, and also increases the typical damage arising from any accident that occurs.
It's being used in a far more binary way, to refer simplistically and solely to the consequences of exceeding the speed limit.
Today, I drive down a stretch of road at 50mph. Nobody dies.
Tomorrow, I drive down the exact same stretch of road at 50mph. Nobody dies.
The speed limit changed overnight from NSL to 40mph. Has the risk changed?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards