📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

To all those on this forum that says speed doesn't kill

Options
1356710

Comments

  • mollycat
    mollycat Posts: 1,475 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    AdrianC wrote: »
    Yes, most people would be dead if not for the whole "not being dead" thing.

    You're wasted on here :rotfl:

    Just wish I hadn't been trying to swallow a mouthful of tea at the exact moment I read this!
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mollycat wrote: »
    Just wish I hadn't been trying to swallow a mouthful of tea at the exact moment I read this!
    My pleasure...
  • Guesses wrote: »
    https://news.sky.com/story/dashcam-footage-captures-motorcyclist-catapulted-through-air-after-horror-collision-11905785

    According to the report, this guy only survived because he was wearing a suit with airbags.

    The dashcam reads 66mph as he enters the bend (so his speedo probably read around 70mph) and it's due to the speed that he veers onto the other side of the road as he takes the bend.

    Everyone should slow down (except the millions of drivers that pootle along at 40mph who should, for the love of god, speed up).
    This who say that speed doesn’t kill (me included) tend to say that inappropriate speed can and does kill.

    Too fast to stop in the distance that you can see to be clear is dangerous, and too fast for the circumstances is also dangerous.

    Doing 180mph on a straight and empty piece of motorway in a car that is designed to do it, and is well maintained, is no danger at all.
  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 34,611 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 11 January 2020 at 3:58PM
    Driving like a !!!! seems to be the problem here, not speed. Interestingly no mention of the speed the bike was doing, looks like he was going at a fair lick too.
  • knightstyle
    knightstyle Posts: 7,228 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I remember some time ago statistics that went something like this:
    If a child runs out into the road and is hit by a car--
    doing 20 or less the child will probably walk away.
    doing 30 the child may have injuries but will probably survive
    doing 40 the child may survive but will probably have life threatening injuries.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I remember some time ago statistics that went something like this:
    If a child runs out into the road and is hit by a car--
    doing 20 or less the child will probably walk away.
    doing 30 the child may have injuries but will probably survive
    doing 40 the child may survive but will probably have life threatening injuries.
    Perhaps if people didn't let their children run out into the road...?
  • DoaM
    DoaM Posts: 11,863 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    molerat wrote: »
    Interestingly no mention of the speed the bike was doing, looks like he was going at a fair lick too.

    Couldn't have been going THAT quick ... his mates behind were going the same speed and managed to stop safely after the first biker was taken out.
  • ElefantEd
    ElefantEd Posts: 1,225 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    For the hard of thinking, "Speed kills" isn't meant to be taken literally - after all we're all travelling around the centre of the galaxy at 500,000mph and it hasn't killed anyone yet. It is meant to be a convenient short-hand way of saying that, all other circumstances being equal, a higher speed increases the probability of an accident, and also increases the typical damage arising from any accident that occurs.


    "Speed kills" trips of the tongue and is easy to remember; the full blown version, rather less so.


    The same concept applies to many other admonitions and warnings. Best to understand them in the spirit in which they are meant rather than treating them as literal statements.
  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,508 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    It's the stopping that kills you......
    Life in the slow lane
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ElefantEd wrote: »
    For the hard of thinking, "Speed kills" isn't meant to be taken literally - after all we're all travelling around the centre of the galaxy at 500,000mph and it hasn't killed anyone yet. It is meant to be a convenient short-hand way of saying that, all other circumstances being equal, a higher speed increases the probability of an accident, and also increases the typical damage arising from any accident that occurs.
    Except that's not the way it's being used, is it?

    It's being used in a far more binary way, to refer simplistically and solely to the consequences of exceeding the speed limit.

    Today, I drive down a stretch of road at 50mph. Nobody dies.
    Tomorrow, I drive down the exact same stretch of road at 50mph. Nobody dies.
    The speed limit changed overnight from NSL to 40mph. Has the risk changed?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.