To all those on this forum that says speed doesn't kill

Car_54

"To all those on this forum that says speed doesn't kill"

And grammar doesn't matter?

oldagetraveller

[quote=[Deleted User];76707823]"To all those on this forum that says speed doesn't kill"

And grammar doesn't matter?[/QUOTE]


Inappropriate speed could prove unwise but poor grammar doesn't kill.
What's the relevance? Or has something passed right over my head?

TooManyPoints

Or has something passed right over my head?

Probably. Spot the difference:

"To all those on this forum that says speed doesn't kill"

"To all those on this forum who say speed doesn't kill"

parking_question_chap

Speed doesnt kill. It just doesnt. Suddenly becoming stationary. Thats what gets you.

I will add this. The driver of the car had a very appropriate name.

[Deleted User]

parking_question_chap wrote: »

Speed doesnt kill. It just doesnt.

Suddenly becoming stationary. Thats what gets you.

Not if a speeding car hits someone stood still in the middle of the road.

Scrapit

So the biker wasn't killed. Not sure what the OP is trying to prove.

AdrianC

While, in this instance, the HGV cannot have been exceeding the speed limit.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/lorry-driver-crashes-motorway-traffic-6938602

(and if we're considering nominative determinism as to the drivers, then...)

Guesses

Scrapit wrote: »

So the biker wasn't killed. Not sure what the OP is trying to prove.

The article says the biker would have been killed if it wasn't for him having a wearable airbag.

AdrianC

Guesses wrote: »

The article says the biker would have been killed if it wasn't for him having a wearable airbag.

Yes, most people would be dead if not for the whole "not being dead" thing.

waamo

Guesses wrote: »

The article says the biker would have been killed if it wasn't for him having a wearable airbag.

He wasn't killed though was he? Speed didn't kill him.