Varley Park University of Brighton - County Court Claim

Redx

Reply to both of them and demand copies of all correspondence relating to you and your vehicle , including all letters that are missing from your SAR replies , within 7 days , or you will report them to the ICO for withholding your personal data

Specifically mention copies of all letters to you at your address , including debt letters

It's not everything that relates to you , it's all your data , just data , letters , pictures , DVLA requests , pdt machines data if one was used etc, so data

Coupon-mad

There won't have been any emails to engage ZZPS. They do not send cases on a one off basis and discuss them by email.

And you are not entitled to see any legal advice contact with the actual solicitor firm.

OPS should have sent the PCN, NTK, any other letters/appeals from you/their replies, the LBC (if one was sent) and all photos taken. I would not be expecting much else.

Egbert_Nobacon

There may not be any missing items but I like the thought of them running around wasting their time searching.

basher52

I have received some further SAR copies from ZZPS and have extracted / copied some of the text below.

"We wrote to you previously about this PCN, and according to us, this debt remains unpaid.
Our next course of action is to pass this account to QDR Solicitors Limited. We would prefer to get to the bottom of this with you, without the need to use lawyers. However, we are duty bound to advise you that if this does get passed to QDR Solicitors Limited, the balance owing will increase by £10 plus VAT.
The Supreme Court ruled in ParkingEye –v- Beavis that a Parking Charge issued on private land is
enforceable and does not breach any consumer regulations.
If this remains unpaid, in the event of legal action taking place, court fees and solicitors costs, along with statutory interest, could be added to the amount owed. The legal process is not simple and if you need advice, places where this can be sought are on the reverse of this letter.
It is in your interests to either get in touch or pay this account and we again invite you to do so within
seven days of you receiving this letter; if the account progresses to our solicitors, we will not be able to
help you.
Yours sincerely
Customer Services
Customer Services"

As I say this is the main part of a letter to me. Note where they state that the supreme court found in favour of Parking Eye vs Beavis.

Redx

We know all about the Supreme court and Beavis , it's old news to us , very well documented in the press and on TV , nothing new regarding Beavis apart from he must have sold more fish and chips due to the publicity

Google it

nosferatu1001

Not sure the point you are making? They did find in favour of PE.

basher52

My narrative was to copy in some of the letter that I received from ZZPs working at the time for One Parking Solutions. I copied the wording as I thought it was quite intimidating / threatening. This and several other letters were received prior to receiving the CC Claim.

Redx

Please don't do it with all their paperwork like their WS , these companies produce rain forest destroying blurb whether it's relevant or not , the fact that you are not familiar with it and it makes you anxious is why they do it , just read what beamerguy keeps saying about it if you really want to fill in your time

Nobody here cares what Zzps say , ever , totally not interested , your case is nothing like the Beavis case

They may as well say don't go to Manchester city centre because the IRA bombed it in 1996 and then they quote the inquiry as being why it should be avoided

Read the bargepole timeline of events to find out what you should do and when

Coupon-mad

basher52 wrote: »

My narrative was to copy in some of the letter that I received from ZZPs working at the time for One Parking Solutions. I copied the wording as I thought it was quite intimidating / threatening. This and several other letters were received prior to receiving the CC Claim.

None of that matters and of course Barry Beavis lost, we were here long before that infamous case was decided and we followed it through its stages. some of us are in touch with Barry B who is an honest PPC fighter. Power to his elbow - he still fights the good fight!

The point is, your case is NOTHING LIKE the facts in Beavis!

Who cares what drivel ZZPS sent you. File those letters, they are irrelevant begging letters and nothing to do with your defence case, which is all about distinguishing your case from Beavis on all facts and showing there was no agreed contract.

And if I am available on the day I can show up in court to argue your case for you, as you know.

basher52

Have today rec'd a letter from DCB Legal advising that OPS have reviewed my submission and will be continuing with their claim. Pre completed questionnaire by them with all the sections mentioned by others. I will not use their form but wait for the court to contact me directly. Very surprised, even from the aspect of the amount claimed.