We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PCN escalated to Court proceedings **EDIT - I WON**
Options
Comments
-
Did you include the precise ref to the court order? There's a reason I stated it2
-
I finally got a reply from one of the associates at BW, but only to tell me to stop making allegations and that although a bundle was submitted on the 3rd, another bundle has been submitted today, to include mine.
I told him, if they had included me and told me what had been submitted I would not of been blind to what was included in the bundle in the first place.
1 -
I did state that they had to submit a single bundle to the court, but they submitted theirs 3rd August without my input, you are in breach of that order
This is what the lovely man at BW has now sent me: Am I missing something, it clearly states 'all documents essential'
I attach a screenshot below from the Order of 24 June 2020, which states:
As Ms Munir lodged this bundle at the Court in advance of this, this has been complied with. There was no requirement to serve a copy of the same upon yourself, or inform you of the same.
0 -
I can't see anything
I take it you e seen their bundle?2 -
nosferatu1001 said:I can't see anything
I take it you e seen their bundle?
0 -
Littlewadie said:nosferatu1001 said:I can't see anything
I take it you e seen their bundle?
They were required to do that.
Maybe you mentioned that - this thread is now so long I'm not going to check back.3 -
KeithP said:Littlewadie said:nosferatu1001 said:I can't see anything
I take it you e seen their bundle?
They were required to do that.
Maybe you mentioned that - this thread is now so long I'm not going to check back.
0 -
"Their" bundle always means their WS etc
not the court bundle which is the combined set
hust state you wish to confirm everything was sent.2 -
Have you shown us their WS and exhibits yet? If not, please do so, especially if the alleged contract is included.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks2
-
Littlewadie said:
This I guess is their landowner agreement, can I pull this to bits on the fact that they state they will comply with the BPA Code Of Practice and I have proved they haven't?
Also additional information is redacted, is that because it isn't relevant or hiding something?
Thanks
Are all the redactions from the scammers/scamlicitors, or are any of them yours? We need to see the contract exactly as supplied to you/the court.
I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards