CPM Parking Appeal Rejected

Jenni_D

What does the court paperwork say regarding by when you must file and serve on all parties "documentation which you intend to rely upon  in court" (or similar wording)? Have you received the claimant's witness statement? (That should be a big clue if you have, as they tend to leave it as close as possible to the relevant date).

Mana2019

Trainerman said:

Did you not re-draft your defence with Jopson v Homeguard, as advised??It would seem to be a very strong point for you, yet I am not sure that your WS refers to it, though I admit I did skim read it.

What I did notice was it that it needs editing for grammar and readability. Examples - para 6 one of the signs are IS, para 7 seems to say that you saw a sign on returning to car ? I would not say that.. Para 8 remove "came back and leave the car park with my vehicle" Para 11 it is not a fine, para 12 needs tidying. etc etc

I know it sounds pedantic, but the better it reads, the better the effect on the person reading it.

I cleaned up the grammar and readability. Is it better?

Coupon-mad said:

Not ready yet. No-one uses the Crosby case.

That's not using the more recent wording from the WS bundles that I advised you to base it on.

I went back and used the Jopson v HomeGuard case and updated the WS bundle.

Mana2019

Jenni_D said:

What does the court paperwork say regarding by when you must file and serve on all parties "documentation which you intend to rely upon  in court" (or similar wording)? Have you received the claimant's witness statement? (That should be a big clue if you have, as they tend to leave it as close as possible to the relevant date).

I don't have the court paperwork on me right now, will update when I get home.

However I do not have the Claimant's witness statement yet.

Mana2019

I forgot to post the updated WS...

https://1drv.ms/w/s!AvEYi0ZeGNPPgYlfRxDMuNDG36HdUQ

And thank you everyone who is helping me so far...really appreciate it...

Coupon-mad

No. That still has Crosby and isn't based on the ones I advised you to base it on.

Mana2019

Coupon-mad said:

No. That still has Crosby and isn't based on the ones I advised you to base it on.

Looks like I wasn't quick enough. I realised I shared the wrong link and edited the post quickly. Please look again?

Mana2019

Also update, just received the Claimant's Witness Statement by the post this morning.

One of their exhibits is clearly incorrect. The exhibit with a map, showing the all the signs posted around the building. One yellow circle (with the x below) was NOT placed there, while the green dot (I edited there) showed where the sign was actually.

https://imgur.com/yzA2sQ0

Trainerman

Mana2019 said:

Coupon-mad said:

No. That still has Crosby and isn't based on the ones I advised you to base it on.

Looks like I wasn't quick enough. I realised I shared the wrong link and edited the post quickly. Please look again?

I am still getting the old one

Mana2019

Trainerman said:

Mana2019 said:

Coupon-mad said:

No. That still has Crosby and isn't based on the ones I advised you to base it on.

Looks like I wasn't quick enough. I realised I shared the wrong link and edited the post quickly. Please look again?

I am still getting the old one

Ok I got rid of the exhibit stuff because I have not gotten around to that yet. There should be no Crosby stuff in the document now.

Do I have to return to the flat and take pictures? Because I may have a feeling things have changed since 2019 when I was living there.

Jenni_D

Will Google Street View for the location show any relevant photos? (There's a slider/control that lets you go back in time).