Bw legal letter of claim

reg76

Pcn was dated Jan 2019

Coupon-mad

Do this then!

I love the way they patronisingly explain Beavis to you. Why not reply patronisingly explaining Beavis back at them about the fact that the costs of 'recovery' letters and time is already included in the parking charge. Point them to para 98 and 198 of Beavis.

And definitely tell them that consumers are not their 'customers' and they need to FRO.

reg76

So it's likely I'll get my day in court, anything else I can add to my final response letter?

Coupon-mad

Like I said:

All as expected and a claim is inevitable from this robo-claim sausage machine.

reg76

OK here is my final response. Any thoughts before I fire it off in the morning
Mr/Mrs/Ms BW Legal
Enterprise House
Apex view
Leeds
LS11 9BH
2 October 2019
Alleged PCN
I write in reference to the above and your recent letter.
As expected you have once again chosen to send me three pages of nonsense in yet another attempt to intimidate me into parting with moneys not owed to your “client” TPS limited.
As I have no wish to continue this ridiculous charade with a person or persons who cannot even grace their mail with and actual signature I will make my response as brief as possible.
I will draw attention to the following points
Point 3 in your letter regarding data protection emails. I still have all emails none of which match what you claim in your response. I will provide copies of these along with your letter to the judge when I attend County Court.

Your comment in point 4 of your letter Re “The act of not parking” makes no sense whatsoever.
Point 12 of your letter. Once again throwing the Beavis case around. Thank you so much for explaining this to me. As you are well versed in this case please take a look at paragraphs 98 and 198 and you will find that the costs of recovery letters and time are already included in the original parking charge. I would also point out that consumers are not your “customers”.
Finally I find your last remark incredibly arrogant to make assumptions on how busy the said car park and indeed the town it is in at any particular time of day unless of course the person(s) composing your letters are a long term resident of Crewe or yourselves at BW legal in LEEDS have conducted a lengthy traffic study of the area to ascertain times of heavy and light traffic.
Of course if this is the case you have my apologies
In closing I completely dispute this unlawful PCN and any charges associated. Furthermore I now invite you to present your claim so I may prepare my defence for court
Sincerely

beamerguy

Of course if this is the case you have my apologies

No apology to a predator

You also need to ask BWLegal on what authority they act upon to add false charges, contrary to the law of POFA2012 and the ruling of the Beavis case

1505grandad

Typo - "grace their mail with an(d) actual signature "

reg76

Yeah I saw the typo and re printed it, well it's in the post now just have to sit and wait for the inevitable thanks all for your assistance

Smallmania

Very keen to hear the outcome of your latest response, I am in the first letter stages of same situation right now.

reg76

Well talk about an anti climax. This is the response conveniently leaving out any answers to my further questions
http://imgur.com/a/1tqmYDr