Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

No deal Brexit or Corbyn government?

14244464748

Comments

  • Aegis
    Aegis Posts: 5,695 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Herzlos wrote: »
    Why is why it's important to write the act properly.
    Indeed - if things had been done properly according to the spirit and letter of the law, none of the court cases would have succeeded.
    I am a Chartered Financial Planner
    Anything I say on the forum is for discussion purposes only and should not be construed as personal financial advice. It is vitally important to do your own research before acting on information gathered from any users on this forum.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Aegis wrote: »
    If the government wanted to find out the view of the people and wanted to implement exactly what the people want, they would put the viable options into a new referendum with binding legislation, much like the AV referendum a few years ago.

    How many options?
  • Aegis
    Aegis Posts: 5,695 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    How many options?
    Four at the moment, I suppose. Remain, No Deal, Johnson Deal, May Deal. I've mentioned elsewhere that the best approach to this would be a single transferable vote, eliminating the least popular options in two rounds and leaving the option that is most preferable to the most people.
    I am a Chartered Financial Planner
    Anything I say on the forum is for discussion purposes only and should not be construed as personal financial advice. It is vitally important to do your own research before acting on information gathered from any users on this forum.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Aegis wrote: »
    Four at the moment, I suppose.

    Unworkable. Mrs May deal no longer exists anyway. Leave vote would be split.

    Corbyn wants his own deal negotiated as well.
  • Sailtheworld
    Sailtheworld Posts: 1,551 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Malthusian wrote: »
    No, we (as in the UK) lost. The US and the USSR won. The winner of the war is not the one who is worse off afterwards, that's not what the verb "win" means.

    If you say so. Looks like the weekend started early for you...
  • If we had lost the war we would be speaking German, and ruled by the Germans.

    Only one of those things is currently happening, and it will cease to happen as soonas we get Brexit done. We would not have that option if Hitler had won.
    What is this life if, full of care, we have no time to stand and stare
  • Aegis
    Aegis Posts: 5,695 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Unworkable.


    How? Single transferrable votes are done all around the world, including some elections in our own country.


    Mrs May deal no longer exists anyway. Leave vote would be split.


    That's why the transferrable vote is important. If the vote gets split, then the least popular option is eliminated, and the second preference then receives the votes. In other words, if it was a split of 100 voters and 31 voted for No Deal, 29 voted for Johnson's Deal and 40 voted for Remain, the least popular would be eliminated (Johnson's Deal) and the votes cast for that would be recounted as either Remain or No Deal. If "Leave with a deal" voters as a whole all prefer No Deal to Remain, then No Deal would win at 60% of the vote, while Remain would lose at 40%.



    This sort of system is designed specifically to find the least objectionable outcome rather than just the one that gets the most votes in the first round.


    Corbyn wants his own deal negotiated as well.



    He's not in power. When (if) he's in power, he can negotiate if he wants, until then he can campaign for whichever of the possible outcomes is on the table, but there's no sense in dragging things out further until he's in power.
    I am a Chartered Financial Planner
    Anything I say on the forum is for discussion purposes only and should not be construed as personal financial advice. It is vitally important to do your own research before acting on information gathered from any users on this forum.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Aegis wrote: »

    That's why the transferrable vote is important. If the vote gets split, then the least popular option is eliminated, and the second preference then receives the votes. In other words, if it was a split of 100 voters and 31 voted for No Deal, 29 voted for Johnson's Deal and 40 voted for Remain, the least popular would be eliminated (Johnson's Deal) and the votes cast for that would be recounted as either Remain or No Deal. If "Leave with a deal" voters as a whole all prefer No Deal to Remain, then No Deal would win at 60% of the vote, while Remain would lose at 40%.



    Not a referendum then.
  • Sailtheworld
    Sailtheworld Posts: 1,551 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Not a referendum then.

    Isn't the important thing with a vote to seek an outcome rather than worry about what it's called?
  • Sailtheworld
    Sailtheworld Posts: 1,551 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Aegis wrote: »
    That's why the transferrable vote is important. If the vote gets split, then the least popular option is eliminated, and the second preference then receives the votes. In other words, if it was a split of 100 voters and 31 voted for No Deal, 29 voted for Johnson's Deal and 40 voted for Remain, the least popular would be eliminated (Johnson's Deal) and the votes cast for that would be recounted as either Remain or No Deal. If "Leave with a deal" voters as a whole all prefer No Deal to Remain, then No Deal would win at 60% of the vote, while Remain would lose at 40%.

    The biggest stumbling block would be the option for remain. Leavers are all for democracy as long as the result of the first referendum is set in stone. Changing your mind in the face of new evidence isn't allowed.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.