Court Letter Robinhood airport bus stop PCN help!

Redx

Yes , submit a supplementary WS to the court and to the claimant

sm1tt

Awesome i thought i could just wanted to confirm now that i have the new revised WS!!

sm1tt

How would i go about serving Video Evidence to Court as part of my Supplementary WS?
Can i just reference the Video or do i have to serve a copy / original before the hearing?


Many thanks in advance!!

Redx

serve it to court and to claimant , on usb stick preferably , or a dvd

but bear in mind you must be able to play it in court, on a tablet or laptop or similar, no point having it if you cannot view it, or show it to the judge and claimant

serve it to the court and also to the claimant , like everything else you have done already , an ambush in court is not allowed

sm1tt

Ok cool! I suspected as such though i now have to find myself a DVD or crappy USB stick.....
I have no problem viewing in court as i use my tablet for documnet reference and my own referencing!


Guess thats another thing to add to the costs list!!


Thanks

Redx

its 2 things , ie:- 2 usb sticks , not one (court + claimant)

your tablet is ok for your own evidence

KeithJ26

Hi Guys,
My son is in a similar position and thought you should know that until late 2018 (I think) those signs did not have the necessary planning consent (Advertisements) and were classified by the Local Planning Authority as 'illegal'. As such, my understanding is that no court would find in favour of the Claimant based on an illegality.

Other might might correct me on that.

nosferatu1001

they SHOULD NOT find in favour of them, but you need to have proof of such with you

Tablet - you CANNOT play the file from your tablet, unless you are playing the usb stick on it. I imagine yo uare not. You must use the same medium as you give to the court and to the claimant to play back the file.

sm1tt

KeithJ26 wrote: »

Hi Guys,
My son is in a similar position and thought you should know that until late 2018 (I think) those signs did not have the necessary planning consent (Advertisements) and were classified by the Local Planning Authority as 'illegal'. As such, my understanding is that no court would find in favour of the Claimant based on an illegality.

Other might might correct me on that.

Hi KeithJ26 i have evidence from the Claimant showing they have permission from the Land Owners to use these signs but not sure if they woudl still have to get planning permission to erect them?


Do you have any evidence of this? As i am in such a late stage of process i have little time to submit more evidence except what i have already submitted with added reference to the original defence.

Coupon-mad

It's really not a silver bullet in small claims. something to mention as an aside maybe but not a winning defence point. IMHO, a Judge will likely bat away suggested illegality of Airport signs - because the signs still exist and were there.

Summing it up very basically, IMHO most Judges will primarily think:

''was there a contract?''

''was it breached?''

''were the signs/lines prominently displayed and were the terms clear?''

then

''did the PPC have landowner authority?''

''any other facts - Blue Badge, grace period, hidden keypad, right to park?''

(in an Airport case) ''is this road private land or public highway? Do byelaws apply and do they prohibit all stopping in all circumstances? Can this private firm enforce those byelaws and/or their contract, here?''

''was what both parties did reasonable under all facts & circumstances?''