We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Strong Customer Authentication - **Now delayed** changes to online verification

12526272830

Comments

  • Uxb1
    Uxb1 Posts: 732 Forumite
    500 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    I'm still looking forward with wry amusement to see how regular but variable payments which are currently treated as being pre-authorised are going to be dealt with in the new regime.

    Are they still going to be regarded as being authorized - or are they going to have to be re-authorized by some 2FA method each time the amount changes.
    If the latter I predict chaos as customers suddenly receive a 2FA request out of the blue for some transaction.

    Typical examples might all types of insurance continuous renewal where they have your card or DD details and currently send/email you the notice of renewal and if you don't do anything then payment is automatically taken.
    Other examples might be anything from magazine/gym subscriptions to variable utilities payments.
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,620 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Uxb1 wrote: »
    Typical examples might all types of insurance continuous renewal where they have your card or DD details and currently send/email you the notice of renewal and if you don't do anything then payment is automatically taken.
    Other examples might be anything from magazine/gym subscriptions to variable utilities payments.
    SCA appies to payment instructions. For Direct Debits and Continuous Payment Authorities, the payment instruction is made once, at the start of the agreement, and individual payments are collected according to that instruction until cancelled.

    It is unlikely that SCA would apply to DDs at all, since they are arranged by the company not the customer, and the bank indemnifies them, while new CPAs might be subject to SCA when the initial payment is made.
  • The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) referred me to their document, "Payment Services and Electronic Money – Our Approach The FCA’s role under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 June 2019 (version 4)":
    <Sorry as a new user you are not allowed to post with links.>
    Section 20.21 states:
    "...For example, not all payment service users will possess a mobile phone or smart phone and payments may be made in areas without mobile phone reception. PSPs must provide a viable means to strongly authenticate customers in these situations."

    I am without mobile phone reception.
    I have raised a formal complaint, quoting the FCA document, with Asda Money (credit card) who stated in an email (25/8/19):
    "Unfortunately if you do not possess a mobile phone, after September 2019 you will no longer be able to use your card online."
    Also Virgin Money (savings) who stated in an email (9/8/19):
    "...you won’t be able to access your account online if we don’t have your mobile number."
    Update:
    When challenged, Asda Money and Virgin Money provided alternatives for customers without mobile phones.
    Santander didn't provide an alternative - they referred me to their terms and conditions and rejected my complaint.
    The Financial Ombudsman (with guidance from the Financial Conduct Authority) upheld my complaint and awarded £200 compensation.

  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 37,810 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) referred me to their document, "Payment Services and Electronic Money – Our Approach The FCA’s role under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 June 2019 (version 4)":
    <Sorry as a new user you are not allowed to post with links.>
    Section 20.21 states:
    "...For example, not all payment service users will possess a mobile phone or smart phone and payments may be made in areas without mobile phone reception. PSPs must provide a viable means to strongly authenticate customers in these situations."

    I am without mobile phone reception.
    I have raised a formal complaint, quoting the FCA document, with Asda Money (credit card) who stated in an email (25/8/19):
    "Unfortunately if you do not possess a mobile phone, after September 2019 you will no longer be able to use your card online."
    Also Virgin Money (savings) who stated in an email (9/8/19):
    "...you won’t be able to access your account online if we don’t have your mobile number."
    Update:
    When challenged, Asda Money and Virgin Money provided alternatives for customers without mobile phones.
    Santander didn't provide an alternative - they referred me to their terms and conditions and rejected my complaint.
    The Financial Ombudsman (with guidance from the Financial Conduct Authority) upheld my complaint and awarded £200 compensation.
    Beyond the compo, have FOS instructed Santander to actually implement something compliant with the FCA steer?
  • The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) referred me to their document, "Payment Services and Electronic Money – Our Approach The FCA’s role under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 June 2019 (version 4)":
    <Sorry as a new user you are not allowed to post with links.>
    Section 20.21 states:
    "...For example, not all payment service users will possess a mobile phone or smart phone and payments may be made in areas without mobile phone reception. PSPs must provide a viable means to strongly authenticate customers in these situations."

    I am without mobile phone reception.
    I have raised a formal complaint, quoting the FCA document, with Asda Money (credit card) who stated in an email (25/8/19):
    "Unfortunately if you do not possess a mobile phone, after September 2019 you will no longer be able to use your card online."
    Also Virgin Money (savings) who stated in an email (9/8/19):
    "...you won’t be able to access your account online if we don’t have your mobile number."
    Update:
    When challenged, Asda Money and Virgin Money provided alternatives for customers without mobile phones.
    Santander didn't provide an alternative - they referred me to their terms and conditions and rejected my complaint.
    The Financial Ombudsman (with guidance from the Financial Conduct Authority) upheld my complaint and awarded £200 compensation.

    I do not have a mobile phone capable of receiving text messages, and complained to Santander two or three years ago on similar grounds. They too rejected my complaint, but when I complained to the Financial Ombudsman, they agreed with Santander and did not uphold my complaint.
  • The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) referred me to their document, "Payment Services and Electronic Money – Our Approach The FCA’s role under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 June 2019 (version 4)":
    <Sorry as a new user you are not allowed to post with links.>
    Section 20.21 states:
    "...For example, not all payment service users will possess a mobile phone or smart phone and payments may be made in areas without mobile phone reception. PSPs must provide a viable means to strongly authenticate customers in these situations."

    I am without mobile phone reception.
    I have raised a formal complaint, quoting the FCA document, with Asda Money (credit card) who stated in an email (25/8/19):
    "Unfortunately if you do not possess a mobile phone, after September 2019 you will no longer be able to use your card online."
    Also Virgin Money (savings) who stated in an email (9/8/19):
    "...you won’t be able to access your account online if we don’t have your mobile number."
    Update:
    When challenged, Asda Money and Virgin Money provided alternatives for customers without mobile phones.
    Santander didn't provide an alternative - they referred me to their terms and conditions and rejected my complaint.
    The Financial Ombudsman (with guidance from the Financial Conduct Authority) upheld my complaint and awarded £200 compensation.

    I do not have a mobile phone capable of receiving text messages, and complained to Santander two or three years ago on similar grounds. They too rejected my complaint, but when I complained to the Financial Ombudsman, they agreed with Santander and did not uphold my complaint.
    Quite right too, banks should not compromise security because of situations like this. Even the most basic mobile phone can have text messages, you can get the Vodafone Alcatel 20.03 for £6 with £10 credit required that will make calls and receive texts fine.
  • The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) referred me to their document, "Payment Services and Electronic Money – Our Approach The FCA’s role under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 June 2019 (version 4)":
    <Sorry as a new user you are not allowed to post with links.>
    Section 20.21 states:
    "...For example, not all payment service users will possess a mobile phone or smart phone and payments may be made in areas without mobile phone reception. PSPs must provide a viable means to strongly authenticate customers in these situations."

    I am without mobile phone reception.
    I have raised a formal complaint, quoting the FCA document, with Asda Money (credit card) who stated in an email (25/8/19):
    "Unfortunately if you do not possess a mobile phone, after September 2019 you will no longer be able to use your card online."
    Also Virgin Money (savings) who stated in an email (9/8/19):
    "...you won’t be able to access your account online if we don’t have your mobile number."
    Update:
    When challenged, Asda Money and Virgin Money provided alternatives for customers without mobile phones.
    Santander didn't provide an alternative - they referred me to their terms and conditions and rejected my complaint.
    The Financial Ombudsman (with guidance from the Financial Conduct Authority) upheld my complaint and awarded £200 compensation.

    I do not have a mobile phone capable of receiving text messages, and complained to Santander two or three years ago on similar grounds. They too rejected my complaint, but when I complained to the Financial Ombudsman, they agreed with Santander and did not uphold my complaint.
    Quite right too, banks should not compromise security because of situations like this. Even the most basic mobile phone can have text messages, you can get the Vodafone Alcatel 20.03 for £6 with £10 credit required that will make calls and receive texts fine.

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) referred me to their document, "Payment Services and Electronic Money – Our Approach The FCA’s role under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 June 2019 (version 4)":
    <Sorry as a new user you are not allowed to post with links.>
    Section 20.21 states:
    "...For example, not all payment service users will possess a mobile phone or smart phone and payments may be made in areas without mobile phone reception. PSPs must provide a viable means to strongly authenticate customers in these situations."

    I am without mobile phone reception.
    I have raised a formal complaint, quoting the FCA document, with Asda Money (credit card) who stated in an email (25/8/19):
    "Unfortunately if you do not possess a mobile phone, after September 2019 you will no longer be able to use your card online."
    Also Virgin Money (savings) who stated in an email (9/8/19):
    "...you won’t be able to access your account online if we don’t have your mobile number."
    Update:
    When challenged, Asda Money and Virgin Money provided alternatives for customers without mobile phones.
    Santander didn't provide an alternative - they referred me to their terms and conditions and rejected my complaint.
    The Financial Ombudsman (with guidance from the Financial Conduct Authority) upheld my complaint and awarded £200 compensation.

    I do not have a mobile phone capable of receiving text messages, and complained to Santander two or three years ago on similar grounds. They too rejected my complaint, but when I complained to the Financial Ombudsman, they agreed with Santander and did not uphold my complaint.
    Quite right too, banks should not compromise security because of situations like this. Even the most basic mobile phone can have text messages, you can get the Vodafone Alcatel 20.03 for £6 with £10 credit required that will make calls and receive texts fine.
    The point I was making was that the Financial Ombudsman upheld KimballKinnison's complaint, but did not uphold mine. Both of us are unable to receive text messages: KimballKinnison having no reception, and my phone being designed without the capability. I'm well aware that there are mobile phones which do have the capability, but the fact that I choose not to use one isn't the issue here: it's that the Financial Ombudsman decided to uphold KimballKinnison's complaint on the grounds that "...For example, not all payment service users will possess a mobile phone or smart phone and payments may be made in areas without mobile phone reception. PSPs must provide a viable means to strongly authenticate customers in these situations.", but did not uphold mine. The reason for the inability to receive a text message is irrelevant.
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 37,810 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) referred me to their document, "Payment Services and Electronic Money – Our Approach The FCA’s role under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 June 2019 (version 4)":
    <Sorry as a new user you are not allowed to post with links.>
    Section 20.21 states:
    "...For example, not all payment service users will possess a mobile phone or smart phone and payments may be made in areas without mobile phone reception. PSPs must provide a viable means to strongly authenticate customers in these situations."

    I am without mobile phone reception.
    I have raised a formal complaint, quoting the FCA document, with Asda Money (credit card) who stated in an email (25/8/19):
    "Unfortunately if you do not possess a mobile phone, after September 2019 you will no longer be able to use your card online."
    Also Virgin Money (savings) who stated in an email (9/8/19):
    "...you won’t be able to access your account online if we don’t have your mobile number."
    Update:
    When challenged, Asda Money and Virgin Money provided alternatives for customers without mobile phones.
    Santander didn't provide an alternative - they referred me to their terms and conditions and rejected my complaint.
    The Financial Ombudsman (with guidance from the Financial Conduct Authority) upheld my complaint and awarded £200 compensation.

    I do not have a mobile phone capable of receiving text messages, and complained to Santander two or three years ago on similar grounds. They too rejected my complaint, but when I complained to the Financial Ombudsman, they agreed with Santander and did not uphold my complaint.
    Quite right too, banks should not compromise security because of situations like this. Even the most basic mobile phone can have text messages, you can get the Vodafone Alcatel 20.03 for £6 with £10 credit required that will make calls and receive texts fine.
    You're missing the point - as highlighted in the first post within this nest of quotes, the FCA steer is that banks must provide alternatives to mobile phone based authentication....
  • robatwork
    robatwork Posts: 7,273 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    @lightbulb2760 I'm fascinated what mobile phone you have that doesn't support SMS. My Nokia in 1998 did.
  • It's all very well to say get a cheap phone but what if you live somewhere where there is no or limited mobile coverage. You don't have to be in the middle of nowhere; my village just happens to be in a valley which restricts the signal. There's nothing I can do to improve the signal.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.