We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BW Legal - Any help very much appreciated...
Comments
-
I must be thinking about the WS and Skeleton.0
-
-
I submitted mine yesterday (Sunday) and i checked MCOL about 1630 this afternoon and it was showing as Defence Received (or words to that affect). HTHdidgeridoooo wrote: »Defence has been submitted, 31 minutes before the deadline, not a deliberate choice, but the raised pulse while I fixed my scanner provided some temporary excitement. Not!
I doubt there is any point me chasing anything? I got the receipt email confirming it was received.
One question I have regarding the next steps - is it worth waiting a little while before spending hours on the WS and skeleton? (In case the claim is dropped or struck out? Not hopeful of that of course, but it's possible.)
Thanks to everyone for the excellent and generous guidance.0 -
didgeridoooo wrote: »I posted about this a week or two ago, and it hasn't changed. This link - https://www.bwlegal.co.uk/author/zvandrewala/
That image is interesting, I wonder why BWL can't display the SRA badge?!
That page looks like it was written by a child. Don't waste your time with rubbish0 -
Roger that. I only mention it because I think that logo is only clickable if a firm is regulated by the SRA, so I wondered if the reverse was also true! Nay bother. ThanksCombatting the pandemic of BWLegal-19, one 'notice of discontinuance' at a time. :-)0
-
didgeridoooo wrote: »Roger that. I only mention it because I think that logo is only clickable if a firm is regulated by the SRA, so I wondered if the reverse was also true! Nay bother. Thanks
It is clickable ... and the linked page returns BWL as validated.
But as said before, that page looks rubbish in Google Chrome.
0 -
It wont be dropped.
Get writing your WS.
Dont waste time on a skeleton. You write that once you get sight of their WS bundle, and it rips it to shreads - as their WS wont be any such thing.0 -
My wife has just called, she is in Maritime Car Park again right now. I told her to get more photos but she only has a crappy old phone, no smart phone etc. She called to say that NOW they have a stuck on label on the sign, which states... editedCombatting the pandemic of BWLegal-19, one 'notice of discontinuance' at a time. :-)0
-
It throws a spanner in THEIR works of course
Get a photo. Get one
1) Proves their signage was inadequate; it has been updated
2) Proves they DO acknowledge a grace period is REQUIRED
3) It being non-permanent is not important.0 -
Signage photos taken 20th August 2019 below. Note the newly stuck on "Parking period commences minutes after entry". I wonder how that impacts my case. Will add to notes for skeleton/WS in case it may be worth mentioning in the hearing. Posting the pictures in case any other member happens across this thread when researching a similar case at this location.

Combatting the pandemic of BWLegal-19, one 'notice of discontinuance' at a time. :-)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards