We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Brexit, the economy and house prices part 5
Comments
-
Define !!!8220;almost politically palatable!!!8221; in this case.
It may be !!!8220;best for the Irish!!!8221; , but what about the British majority in NI?
I can't quite figure out if the removal of NI MP's would be good or bad for the other parties. With the last GE results, having no NI MP's would mean Tories would have got a majority (I think).
So "almost politically palatable" means "crap for few enough people for politicians to get away with it".
Bear in mind that at this stage of Brexit, it's all about how politicians can keep their jobs whilst upsetting as few people as possible. Upsetting the NI citizens in order to appease the Euro-sceptic Tories doesn't seem like a particularly bad option for someone with that motivation.
Of course, if NI was allowed to leave the UK, Scotland would get even noisier. But then if NI gets special dispensation to stay in the CU, Scotland will ask for that too.0 -
They'd hate it. But most of mainland UK wouldn't care, so it'd be unlikely to produce enough outrage to topple a government.
I can't quite figure out if the removal of NI MP's would be good or bad for the other parties. With the last GE results, having no NI MP's would mean Tories would have got a majority (I think).
So "almost politically palatable" means "crap for few enough people for politicians to get away with it".
Bear in mind that at this stage of Brexit, it's all about how politicians can keep their jobs whilst upsetting as few people as possible. Upsetting the NI citizens in order to appease the Euro-sceptic Tories doesn't seem like a particularly bad option for someone with that motivation.
Of course, if NI was allowed to leave the UK, Scotland would get even noisier. But then if NI gets special dispensation to stay in the CU, Scotland will ask for that too.
You talk way too glibly about the sensibilities of those in NI who identify as British. You do know there were two sets of terrorists during the troubles don’t you?
If a border on the island of Ireland is enough to get you worrying about how the Nationalist community would react, extend that logic to how Loyalists would react to a border in the Irish Sea between them and them and their kith and kin in the rest of the U.K.“Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧0 -
ilovehouses wrote: »I think it was established that compromise was necessary a long time ago. Isn't the discussion about who will accept what and where we end up?
Not really. It’s pretty much sorted isn’t it?
This board’s team remain are all pretty clear that it’s going to be EEA or some slightly adjusted variant.
And you are all happy with that too.0 -
No that's a fair point. I hadn't considered that angle. I'd assumed there'd be enough of a majority to avoid problems, but that's naive.0
-
I have long been thinking this thread is pointless.
What will happen is the UK and the eu will settle on a deal, Spain will veto it and we will end up out without a deal and the eu will not get a penny.
Happy days.What is this life if, full of care, we have no time to stand and stare0 -
To suggest that there is any possibility of a return to violence in Ireland whatever the outcome of Brexit negotiations is beyond ridiculous.
Apart from a few nutters known to the security services, there is no interest in kicking things off.0 -
Enterprise_1701C wrote: »I have long been thinking this thread is pointless.
What will happen is the UK and the eu will settle on a deal, Spain will veto it and we will end up out without a deal and the eu will not get a penny.
Happy days.
Quite. Any deal has to get past 27 EU parliaments, our own, MEPS and the European Commission. What are the chances of that?0 -
Quite. Any deal has to get past 27 EU parliaments, our own, MEPS and the European Commission. What are the chances of that?
According to Andrew Neill’s twitter account, TM’s Government are now telling Brexiteers that no deal is not an option and any rejection of the deal they get will result in the U.K. probably remaining in the EU.
Make of that what you will.“Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧0 -
Quite. Any deal has to get past 27 EU parliaments, our own, MEPS and the European Commission. What are the chances of that?
Any time the remain side point out that there are difficulties and problems associated with a proposal, they are accused of being negative and defeatist and unpatriotic and should jolly well get behind the proposal and be optimistic.
Why should things be any different for the brexiteers?0 -
Any deal has to get past 27 EU parliaments
More than 27. Believe it's 35 by the time you include regional.
Then there's also.“Central Europe would veto any Brexit deal limiting rights to work in Britain: Slovak PM”
Reuters, 17 September 2016
And people think there are problems now. :rotfl:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards