Are they taking this as notice of ownership?

Ralph-y

well done ... did you get expenses ?

who was the judge and where ?

Ralph

Umkomaas

Richard_Snowden said:

So I have received a letter yesterday from the courts with the following ruling:
The claim is struck out as an abuse of process.
It states that the claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charges which it is alleged the Defendant contracted to pay and goes on to say that this additional charge is not recoverable under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 nor with reference to the judgement in Parking Eve v Beavis.

Thank you all for your support in this process and helping me fight my corner.

Hey, hey, hey - well done. 👏. Judges are starting to line up nicely on the Abuse of Process front. Could you tell us which court and (if there is a name), which Judge gave the Order please?

i bet you're glad the pubs have just reopened in England! 🍺 

Richard_Snowden

nosferatu1001 said:

Nice!
which court, claim number etc?

Southampton County Court is on the letter head.
Claim Number - G7DP801T
Ruling from District Judge Grand sitting at the County Court at Newport (IOW)
It's a real weight off of my mind!

Umkomaas

Even if you had a completely free choice, you couldn't have selected a better court/Judge combo in the whole of England and Wales than IoW/DJ Grand. Judge Grand has been one of the main movers and shakers in promulgating the line on Abuse of Process and summarily striking out PPC claims where irrecoverable 'extras' are added to claims. The chancers are rapidly being outed. 

The county courts in this part of southern England have started to become a PPC graveyard.

ANOTHER PREMIER PARKING SOLUTIONS LTD COURT CASE BITES THE DUST

Again, well done, sleep easy!

Redx

Now you know why current defences are skewed towards getting the claim thrown out due to the abuse of process add-on even though it does not address the core issues regarding the PCN

Had the claimant been less greedy and used a claim like Parking Eye with no additional charges then you would be fighting the core PCN which is what should have happened

Well done

The more of these there are , the further the word will spread to all courts and then the whole process may become limited to how it should be instead of a shark feeding frenzy

nosferatu1001

It would be tempting to write to the court asking fir costs due to unreasonable behaviour 

filing a knowingly abusive claim might have a shot 

this would be costs to write defence, etc 

D_P_Dance

Indeed, they have, no doubt, wasted a considerable amount of your time.  

Coupon-mad

So Premier Parking Solutions have also felt DJ Grand's wrath!  Clearly nothing has happened in that court circuit to change things since 2019 then. 

I wonder if some court areas will do this more now, to clear their backlog list?

We are collecting these strike outs judgments!  Could you possibly let us have a clear photo of it to add to the ones we have collected earlier (see attachment - you can cover your name of course). Well done for sticking with us for 3 years to kill this scam!

Richard_Snowden

Coupon-mad said:

So Premier Parking Solutions have also felt DJ Grand's wrath!  Clearly nothing has happened in that court circuit to change things since 2019 then. 

I wonder if some court areas will do this more now, to clear their backlog list?

We are collecting these strike outs judgments!  Could you possibly let us have a clear photo of it to add to the ones we have collected earlier (see attachment - you can cover your name of course). Well done for sticking with us for 3 years to kill this scam!

I can't thank you all enough. Its down to forums like this that people with no knowledge of the legal system dare to make a stand. 
Here's the letter I received. Next stage, attempt to claim for my wasted time!!

Umkomaas

The 'Reasons' given by the Judge are so clear and to the point they could have been drafted by Coupon-mad herself! 😊