Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Brexit, The Economy and House Prices (Part 2)

14546485051373

Comments

  • Even the Swiss repeatedly refuse EU calls to allow ECJ judgements in supposed reciprocity; why on earth should the UK?
    A treaty would not in itself expand business ties, but instead set out how Switzerland could fall under the aegis of EU institutions such as ECJ judgements or state aid rules in return for market access.
    "This poses a problem as the Swiss do not want to be subject to these things. We have been discussing this for over three years and are now in the 17th or 18th round of talks," said a Swiss official familiar with the discussions.
    http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-swiss-eu-idUKKBN19I0PT?il=0

    Interestingly (from that report) it looks like the Swiss want to see how the EU handle Brexit and then "perhaps adopt a similar position to the UK" suspecting that the EU really only want to get Swiss agreement in order to concentrate upon Brexit.
    The Swiss are obviously wise to EU tactics too.
  • cogito
    cogito Posts: 4,898 Forumite
    gfplux wrote: »
    Here's is the published offer. I assume you have read it and compared it to the one from the EU.
    British Home Office https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/621848/60093_Cm9464_NSS_SDR_Web.pdf

    EU offer
    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/position-paper-essential-principles-citizens-rights_en

    While the British Government has not commented on the EU paper published two weeks ago The early response by Barnier yesterday to the published paper is Luke warm.
    "More ambition, clarity and guarantees needed than in today’s U.K. position,” EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier said on Twitter. The bloc’s goal is for the “same level of protection as in EU law,” he said.

    It's all up for negotiations. It will be interesting to see which side moves and how far.

    The UK government has made it clear that this is a red line and It would be outrageous if they caved in to the EU's demands. There cannot be a compromise on this fundamental issue of national sovereignty.
  • What only 60% of Express readers now support Brexit vs 93% in February 2016?

    It's a dramatic shift in opinion if true.
    Ahem.
    Now let's see if you can prove that you are adult enough to stop your what amounts to no more than incessant bickering and move on?

    That would be a "no" then.

    beatdeadhorse.gif


    Moving on (well, I can live in hope) the EU antitrust case I spoke of yesterday?
    EU hits Google with record 2.42 billion euro antitrust fine
    http://uk.reuters.com/article/us-eu-google-antitrust-idUKKBN19I108
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    What only 60% of Express readers now support Brexit vs 93% in February 2016?

    It's a dramatic shift in opinion if true.

    What I found both interesting and depressing was the lack of focus on Brexit during the GE ... from either side.

    Essentially, it got squeezed out of the debate space, and I think it hurt the minor parties like LibDems.

    The GE was an opportunity for someone with great vision; who could see the Brexit vote in a wider context; and mobilise support.

    We don't have anyone like that alas. Corbyn had a soapbox, but he seemed to hark back to bygone eras of nationalization.

    May was timid in adopting economic liberalism, which would seem to find a natural home in the Tory party. Maybe they are worried of looking too much like UKIP? Who knows.

    A missed opportunity? Time will tell.
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    That Google fine on top of the EU's intrusion into Apple is another reason these firms have every incentive to move to the UK.


    Seriously, take a look at the NI deductions on your payslip that your firm hands over to HMRC. This is overlooked in discussions about 'evil' corporations.


    Lets take those jobs and the NI even if these corps pay too little in corporation tax.
  • Will we see more unrest in France?
    Given the degree of anti-EU sentiment, with the addition of yesterday's announcement of further austerity cuts in order to meet the EU's deficit target we might.
    This from Finance Minister Bruno la Maire:
    Le Maire said there would have to be public expenditure cuts ranging from the state and local government to social services.
    "France has been drugged by public spending. We have to reduce public spending because it's a question of national sovereignty,"
    http://uk.reuters.com/article/us-france-economy-deficit-idUKKBN19H2CT
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Conrad wrote: »
    That Google fine on top of the EU's intrusion into Apple is another reason these firms have every incentive to move to the UK.


    Seriously, take a look at the NI deductions on your payslip that your firm hands over to HMRC. This is overlooked in discussions about 'evil' corporations.


    Lets take those jobs and the NI even if these corps pay too little in corporation tax.

    Do you really want us to become a tax haven? What happens when we allow google to pay 0% corporation tax and then they ask to pay less NI? Will we get stuck in a race to the bottom with other tax havens?
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Herzlos wrote: »
    Do you really want us to become a tax haven? What happens when we allow google to pay 0% corporation tax and then they ask to pay less NI? Will we get stuck in a race to the bottom with other tax havens?



    NI is a set standard amount based on employee incomes, so no we wont be suddenly massively reducing it.


    Once again you imply independent nations are mere victims to be taken for a ride by corporations, but there is no meaningful evidence of this from other advanced independent nations.
  • gfplux
    gfplux Posts: 4,985 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Hung up my suit!
    There will be no Brexit dividend for Britain.
  • setmefree2
    setmefree2 Posts: 9,072 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee!
    Even the Swiss repeatedly refuse EU calls to allow ECJ judgements in supposed reciprocity; why on earth should the UK?
    http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-swiss-eu-idUKKBN19I0PT?il=0

    Interestingly (from that report) it looks like the Swiss want to see how the EU handle Brexit and then "perhaps adopt a similar position to the UK" suspecting that the EU really only want to get Swiss agreement in order to concentrate upon Brexit.
    The Swiss are obviously wise to EU tactics too.

    Interesting article. Thanks.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.