Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Brexit, The Economy and House Prices (Part 2)

14243454748373

Comments

  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    No matter what was said, to some he will never be right.
    Had he said definitively "we will ...... " no doubt you would instead be asking how he could be so sure.

    True, he is trying to do the impossible.

    However, now we can assume he's done some research he certainly sounds less confident about a good outcome than before, no?

    Had he still at least had some blind optimism about him it'd be good, but it sounds like he's aleady given up and is in damage limitation mode.
  • Herzlos wrote: »
    True, he is trying to do the impossible.

    However, now we can assume he's done some research he certainly sounds less confident about a good outcome than before, no?

    Had he still at least had some blind optimism about him it'd be good, but it sounds like he's aleady given up and is in damage limitation mode.
    I don't think so.
    I see him as more cautious following not only a poor election but following increasingly vehement protest at a number of recent events, which seems a sensible approach in those circumstances.
    Why poke a sleeping bear?
    Which brings me to another:
    "Softly softly catchee monkey". ;)
  • A translated article from Poland today:
    Deutsche Bank bought two office buildings in London for 310 million pounds. The German giant assumes that in the long run Brexit will not negatively impact the market.
    https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&prev=search&rurl=translate.google.co.uk&sl=pl&sp=nmt4&u=http://forsal.pl/swiat/brexit/artykuly/1053341,brexit-juz-niestraszny-nawet-deutsche-bank-inwestuje-w-nieruchomosci-w-londynie.html&usg=ALkJrhjOY-QlwYdLj84BeJF84mVzdGyIyw
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Are the EU just trying to garner income from elsewhere now that the UK will take it's funding with it on Brexit?

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/google-could-be-a-day-away-from-at-least-1-billion-eu-antitrust-fine-2017-06-26

    Could they be trying to uphold citizens rights? Or is the EU only about extracting as much money as possible?
  • Breaking news, albeit expected: "May reveals ‘fair and serious’ post-Brexit plan for EU citizens"
    One of the main concessions is that EU nationals will no longer have to show they have comprehensive sickness insurance, which was a bone of contention in Brussels.
    https://www.ft.com/content/bda0c8b2-39af-3022-9de9-6f075a314d80?mhq5j=e3


    Of course (as I have said before) this is only a gesture in all probability.
    Because the likelihood is that the EU will simply reject it as being not as all-encompassing as they would like ( read: demand ).
  • Herzlos wrote: »
    Could they be trying to uphold citizens rights? Or is the EU only about extracting as much money as possible?
    My mention of income was tongue-in-cheek ...... but watch Brexit for an idea of whether the EU is all about money or more about upholding (it's) citizen's rights.
    It has however been proven beyond doubt that the EU cares little about anybody's rights outside the EU.
  • And to continue from both Herzlos' question above and the earlier EU Citizens Plan post, here's a reaction:
    NIGEL EVANS ploughed into Donald Tusk accusing him of using EU citizens living in Britain as bargaining chips in Brexit talks.
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/821431/Brexit-latest-news-Donald-Tusk-berated-EU-citizens-pawns-Theresa-May-DUP

    Yes it's the Express - it is nonetheless relevant though.
    Yes this issue has arisen before - it is nonetheless relevant again.
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    Breaking news, albeit expected: "May reveals ‘fair and serious’ post-Brexit plan for EU citizens"


    https://www.ft.com/content/bda0c8b2-39af-3022-9de9-6f075a314d80?mhq5j=e3


    Of course (as I have said before) this is only a gesture in all probability.
    Because the likelihood is that the EU will simply reject it as being not as all-encompassing as they would like ( read: demand ).


    Ah well jock, the way it works is this.
    When you leave the EU they tell you that you can't have the same trading arrangement as it would be unfair.
    But when it comes to citizens rights, you have to give them exactly the same as they have now as otherwise it would be unfair.
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    My mention of income was tongue-in-cheek ...... but watch Brexit for an idea of whether the EU is all about money or more about upholding (it's) citizen's rights.
    It has however been proven beyond doubt that the EU cares little about anybody's rights outside the EU.

    I don't think it's money grabbing to ensure that we pay for our liabilities. We'll see what happens though.

    Plus, this first round seems to be more about their citizens rights.
    mrginge wrote: »
    Ah well jock, the way it works is this.
    When you leave the EU they tell you that you can't have the same trading arrangement as it would be unfair.
    But when it comes to citizens rights, you have to give them exactly the same as they have now as otherwise it would be unfair.

    They want their citizens rights to be maintained, which seems fair. We Brexited ours away, but why should EU nationals have to suffer?
  • I thought the on-topic point was that support for Brexit had dramatically declined among Express readers. Of course nobody thinks the report you posted will have any influence on the result of a year ago.



    Saying I've misunderstood something doesn't make it so.
    Still trying to get this thread closed with continual pointless posts then?

    If you really cannot understand the difference between a "lie" and "disingenuous" you have indeed misunderstood - or are you now denying that you accused me of saying you lied?



    Now to untangle myself from further prevarication and just reported-upon, the ECB's Mario Draghi says that EU inequalities are destabilising:
    Europe's growing inequality is highly destabilising and needs to be tackled with education, innovation and investment in human capital, particularly jobs for young people, European Central Bank President Mario Draghi said on Monday.
    http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-ecb-policy-draghi-idUKKBN19H1Z7?il=0
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.