IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).

Letter before Claim - Wright Hassall/ZZPS

marty1888
marty1888 Posts: 469 Forumite
edited 6 June 2017 at 11:14AM in Parking tickets, fines & parking
I received a LBC today from Wright Hassall on the instructions of ZZPS stating that I have 14 days from the date of the letter to settle the PCN claim.

In December 2016 I was issued with a ticket for parking 'Without Valid Permit or Authority' in my space at work.

Unfortunately the permit had fallen from the windscreen when the PCN was issued but I do have valid authority to park there and have done for 8 years without issue.

Intially I rang the number on the PCN and requested that they remove it as it was my allocated space, paid for by the company I work for and that I have a valid permit to park there. They requested I send over photos so I did along with a formal email appealing the ticket.

They replied back with their own photos and said that they did not dispute that I had authority to park there just that I hadn't been displaying a permit at the time.

Should I have received a POPLA at the point where I emailed the appeal?

Subsequently, a letter was received to the Registered Keeper of the vehicle (my partner) and she passed on my details to them via email.

For the past number of months ZZPS and Wright Hassall have been contacting me regularly in regards to the alleged debt which has now increased from £25 to £196.00 inlcuding additonal charges.

What are my options here?

Thanks.
«13456789

Comments

  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 42,994 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    'Letter Before Claim' or 'Letter of Claim'?

    To whom does the letter tell you to pay (if you're daft enough that is!)?

    Signed by 'Tim Hawker'?
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • marty1888
    marty1888 Posts: 469 Forumite
    Umkomaas wrote: »
    'Letter Before Claim' or 'Letter of Claim'?

    To whom does the letter tell you to pay (if you're daft enough that is!)?

    Signed by 'Tim Hawker'?

    Yes, signed by the very man.

    It says 'FORMAL LETTER OF CLAIM' as the heading but in the last paragraph says 'This is a letter before claim pursuant to Practice Direction or Pre Action Conduct Protocols".

    It doesn't actually say who to pay, it just says that they have been instructed by ZZPS and that I should call them to discuss repayment and avoid further action.
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 42,994 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Debt collector letter. Treat as per the NEWBIES FAQ sticky, post #4 and the following thread:

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5035663
    it just says that they have been instructed by ZZPS and that I should call them to discuss repayment and avoid further action.
    ZZPS cannot 'instruct' them in this matter, because even if it was a debt (which it isn't), it doesn't belong to ZZPS.
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 6 June 2017 at 11:37AM
    You have not said who the PPC is ?

    It is the PPC who would instruct Wright Hassall not ZZPS

    Wright Hassall rent out their letterhead which is a disgusting
    thing to do for a solicitor and that is why WH are seen as low grade
    solicitors.
    In a recent court case WH were criticised by judge for their bad
    behaviour

    ZZPS are simple debt collectors which use low life methods
    Welcome to world of scammers and liars

    But who is the PPC ?
  • marty1888
    marty1888 Posts: 469 Forumite
    The PPC is OKS Empire Ltd TA Local Car Park Management:

    http://www.localcarparkmanagement.com/

    Letter states 'We are instructed by ZZPS on behalf of the Car Park Operator".

    Safe to assume then that this is just an additional threat? I've ignored all previous corresondence but read the advice that if anything suggesting LBC needs to be actioned. Am I good to continue to ignore?
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 42,994 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I very much doubt that this will ever get anywhere near a courtroom, unless you're the unluckiest of people and become their first ever court case.

    http://www.bmpa.eu/companydata/OKS_Empire.html_TA_Local_Car_Park_Management.html

    https://bmpa.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/203682912-Local-Car-Park-Management
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • Fruitcake
    Fruitcake Posts: 59,434 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The advice to ignore private parking charges has not been given here since the law changed in 2012. As they are BPA members this could easily have been beaten at PoPLA.

    Ignoring debt collectors however is safe and is all you can do now unless you get real court papers.
    I married my cousin. I had to...
    I don't have a sister. :D
    All my screwdrivers are cordless.
    "You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks
  • marty1888
    marty1888 Posts: 469 Forumite
    Fruitcake wrote: »
    The advice to ignore private parking charges has not been given here since the law changed in 2012. As they are BPA members this could easily have been beaten at PoPLA.

    Ignoring debt collectors however is safe and is all you can do now unless you get real court papers.

    I assumed that when they rejected the initial email appeal that they should have provided me with a POPLA code or would I have needed to specifically ask for that?

    I have all correspondence in relation to that.
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 6 June 2017 at 12:25PM
    marty1888 wrote: »
    The PPC is OKS Empire Ltd TA :

    http://www.localcarparkmanagement.com/

    Letter states 'We are instructed by ZZPS on behalf of the Car Park Operator".

    Safe to assume then that this is just an additional threat? I've ignored all previous corresondence but read the advice that if anything suggesting LBC needs to be actioned. Am I good to continue to ignore?

    The first comment I would make is looking at that website, the parking company operate a "self ticketing" operation ?
    That means that somebody is probably paid a commission using a camera to which pictures are sent to the operator.

    "They replied back with their own photos and said that they did not dispute that I had authority to park there just that I hadn't been displaying a permit at the time."


    In a further recent case, a judge dismissed the case where a permit could not be seen as it had slipped off the dashboard.
    They agree you are authorised to park so whoever took the pictures did not see the permit. The pictures will only show your windscreen

    Who has authorised you to park and since when ?

    "Letter states 'We are instructed by ZZPS on behalf of the Car Park Operator".

    This is total rubbish, ZZPS capacity is ONLY chasing people and it must be Local Car Park Management who instruct WH

    This highly misleading information using Wright Hassall's letter heading should be reported to the SRA
    https://www.sra.org.uk/home/home.page

    Wright Hassall as solicitors would be crazy to even face a judge with such rubbish
  • marty1888
    marty1888 Posts: 469 Forumite
    beamerguy wrote: »
    The first comment I would make is looking at that website, the parking company operate a "self ticketing" operation ?
    That means that somebody is probably paid a commission using a camera to which pictures are sent to the operator.

    "They replied back with their own photos and said that they did not dispute that I had authority to park there just that I hadn't been displaying a permit at the time."


    In a further recent case, a judge dismissed the case where a permit could not be seen as it had slipped off the dashboard.
    They agree you are authorised to park so whoever took the pictures did not see the permit. The pictures will only show your windscreen

    Who has authorised you to park and since when ?

    "Letter states 'We are instructed by ZZPS on behalf of the Car Park Operator".

    This is total rubbish, ZZPS capacity is ONLY chasing people and it must be Local Car Park Management who instruct WH

    This highly misleading information using Wright Hassall's letter heading should be reported to the SRA
    https://www.sra.org.uk/home/home.page

    Essentially, the Landlord of our building employs someone to wander the car park everyday checking permits, they then issue tickets for not displaying a valid permit which is what happened in this instance. I think it's then passed on to Local Car Park Management to collect/manage.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.