We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.
Your views please! Re who really ruins a relationship?
Comments
-
POPPYOSCAR wrote: »Marriage is a contract.
It is up to the parties that made that contract to keep to the terms.
No one else can break that contract other than themselves.
By definition an affair is involving a third person to break the contract.It is not because things are difficult that we dare not venture
It is because we dare not venture that they are difficult
SENECA0 -
tensandunits wrote: »By definition an affair is involving a third person to break the contract.
That third person does not break the contract as they have made no contract.
It is the behaviour of the persons party to the contract that breaks it.0 -
POPPYOSCAR wrote: »That third person does not break the contract as they have made no contract.
It is the behaviour of the persons party to the contract that breaks it.
That still doesn't absolve them of responsibility for their own actions.It is not because things are difficult that we dare not venture
It is because we dare not venture that they are difficult
SENECA0 -
tensandunits wrote: »That still doesn't absolve them of responsibility for their own actions.
That was not your argument.
Every one is responsible for their own actions but only the parties involved can be responsible for said breaking of marriage contract.0 -
I would say the cheating partner is in the wrong, the person they cheated with might be in the wrong depending on circumstances.
Usually the affair will come after a chain of events further back in the relationship so the spouse might be to blame here as well.0 -
I would say the cheating partner is in the wrong, the person they cheated with might be in the wrong depending on circumstances.
Usually the affair will come after a chain of events further back in the relationship so the spouse might be to blame here as well.
They may not even know!.
I used to work in the insurance industry and one broker I used to deal with had a client who had two families, neither of which knew of the existence of the other.
He had made provision for both of them in the event of his death.0 -
POPPYOSCAR wrote: »That was not your argument.
Every one is responsible for their own actions but only the parties involved can be responsible for said breaking of marriage contract.
Legally or morally?It is not because things are difficult that we dare not venture
It is because we dare not venture that they are difficult
SENECA0 -
tensandunits wrote: »Legally or morally?
These posts are getting rather stale.
Clearly you have a moral view point on this, others don't agree with you. How about don't push your morals on other people?0 -
These posts are getting rather stale.
Clearly you have a moral view point on this, others don't agree with you. How about don't push your morals on other people?
I'm sorry if you feel that discussing a topic is pushing my views on people. In a discussion, everyone will put their own viewpoint across. Not everyone will say the same thing, - it'd be a boring old debate if we did.
I note the question wasn't answered.It is not because things are difficult that we dare not venture
It is because we dare not venture that they are difficult
SENECA0 -
POPPYOSCAR wrote: »They may not even know!.
I used to work in the insurance industry and one broker I used to deal with had a client who had two families, neither of which knew of the existence of the other.
He had made provision for both of them in the event of his death.
As I said might be in the wrong depending on circumstances.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards