We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

Dementia Home wanting to expand into semi detached neighbour

1457910

Comments

  • Doozergirl wrote: »
    I didn't say that money's post was paranoid, but considering somone's thought process is a total waste of time because you can never know the answer. It can also create distress when you believe your thoughts. You deal with what is in front of you. All that exists is now.

    Although her posts get more weird. The National policy, along with local development plans and supplementary planning guidance are what guides planning decisions. Not whether one councillor has an elderly relative. Most planning decisions are made by one planning officer. More contentious cases may be decided by committee of a dozen or so councillors. They still have to make their decisions on policy.

    Countless threads like this go entirely off point while people get sucked in to thinking about things they can't know.

    Hi doozergirl, thanks I didn't want to insult you - I think your pragmatic approach is probably just as valid as money's, but coming at it from a different angle. It's refreshing and useful to hear all constructive points of view on this forum, so thank you both for your advice, all of which has helped.
  • Right, all assumptions and prejudices aside...

    What exactly OP do you think is going to happen?

    Not a single person on here sits on the committee that'll decide this matter. And that's on the assumption your neighbour sells.

    That being the case...

    Sell up
    Shut up
    Or fight something that hasn't even happened
  • I imagine most of us would object vociferously to a semi being relegated to a terrace regardless of what was attached?

    The OP is just exploring whether that is a realistic possibility given that her neighbour has had an approach. Who wouldn't?

    Money talks, and if the neighbour is offered enough, they may well take it, especially as they have only just moved in and will have no emotional ties to the home. There is mileage in finding out why now, when six months ago they could have bought when it was on the open market.

    Have they had the nod that planning is likely to be granted? Who would embark upon such a purchase without doing their homework? The care system is in chaos, the council may have indicated they will look favourably on any expansion to help with bed blocking.

    I imagine they would like both properties but are taking a divide and conquer approach. Unfortunately, the Op is in the least desirable property from the perpective of the nursing home, they would only want hers if neighbour A sells, and if they do they then have the OP over a barrel. Unfortunately, no matter what neighbour A says now, if enough money is thrown at them they will probably cave in.

    In the OP's shoes I would be making an appointment with my local planning and asking for their views. I would also check with my old neighbour if they had been approached, and get it documented that they had issues with safety. Then I would cross my fingers and hope my neighbours hold out and stand beside me.
  • Valid points indeed H & C:T.

    The "nod on planning" may well be the thing that has made the difference between now and some months back (ie when neighbours property was for sale). Perhaps the care home felt pessimistic about getting "the nod" back then - but maybe there has been a change of councillors or something and they are a sight more optimistic now.

    Worth going online and looking up the Council minutes for the last year or so to see if they shed any light on this imo.
  • I imagine most of us would object vociferously to a semi being relegated to a terrace regardless of what was attached?

    The OP is just exploring whether that is a realistic possibility given that her neighbour has had an approach. Who wouldn't?

    Money talks, and if the neighbour is offered enough, they may well take it, especially as they have only just moved in and will have no emotional ties to the home. There is mileage in finding out why now, when six months ago they could have bought when it was on the open market.

    Have they had the nod that planning is likely to be granted? Who would embark upon such a purchase without doing their homework? The care system is in chaos, the council may have indicated they will look favourably on any expansion to help with bed blocking.

    I imagine they would like both properties but are taking a divide and conquer approach. Unfortunately, the Op is in the least desirable property from the perpective of the nursing home, they would only want hers if neighbour A sells, and if they do they then have the OP over a barrel. Unfortunately, no matter what neighbour A says now, if enough money is thrown at them they will probably cave in.

    In the OP's shoes I would be making an appointment with my local planning and asking for their views. I would also check with my old neighbour if they had been approached, and get it documented that they had issues with safety. Then I would cross my fingers and hope my neighbours hold out and stand beside me.

    So exactly, a complete load of if's,but's and maybe's....

    The whole premise is hypothetical.
  • sparky130a wrote: »
    So exactly, a complete load of if's,but's and maybe's....

    The whole premise is hypothetical.

    Only when it is happening to someone else;)
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I imagine most of us would object vociferously to a semi being relegated to a terrace regardless of what was attached?

    The OP's house has another property connected to one side now - and will at the end.
    The OP's house has nothing connected to the other side now - and won't at the end.

    Like I said - there are three things needed here...

    The neighbour to sell.
    PP for change of use.
    PP for the building work.
  • AdrianC wrote: »
    The OP's house has another property connected to one side now - and will at the end.
    The OP's house has nothing connected to the other side now - and won't at the end.

    Like I said - there are three things needed here...

    The neighbour to sell.
    PP for change of use.
    PP for the building work.

    A semi is two buildings attached....with a gap between the next. That gap won't exist so the house will effectively become an end terrace.

    I agree three things are needed, and who knows if they have had the unoffical nod that planners can see no issues? If you watch the property programmes planners are often consulted by prospective buyers for opinions on the chances of PP being approved.
  • Thats definitely some food for thought and I think you've summed up my fears pretty well. I will ask outright about why they didn't try to buy last year next time I see the home manager. He didn't strike me as a tremendously good liar when I met him, so will be interesting to see if I get a straight answer or whether he squirms a bit!

    I'll definitely be making an appointment with a planning officer this week and seeing how they think the land lies. There's been no plans submitted yet (I've checked) but that's not to say they haven't had conversations with the council on it.

    Like I've said, I really don't want to move, but I also am willing to be reasonable and sell to them to facilitate their expansion. I just don't want to be screwed over as it has the possibility of really ruining us. We can't afford to take a hit on our house. I worry that their initial move is already an underhand way of trying to bully us down, so I think I'm right to be wary of them acting in a fair manner.
  • Only when it is happening to someone else;)

    Oh !!!!!!.

    There IS nothing happening. Nothing, nada, not a thing yet.

    If one is that bothered about what MIGHT happen buy a place in the highlands. Though no doubt some crazy will tell you that's about to be concreted over...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.