Parking tickets Scotland

Hard_workers

If you look at sheriff courts daily rolls in the Angus area you can see other car parking companies listed for hearings.
The person who lost the case because they didn't notify the company it was in England.
The driver not rk parked in 2 separate car parks 1 euro car parks - signage confused them and then it appears some mug removed the paper ticket before the driver returned.
The 2nd car park a parking eye car park basically the driver thought it would be ok.

Quentin it said 4 things to do and it said not to ignore parking eye on the drp link you sent me.

Quentin

The drp link makes it clear you can ignore them.


The advice not to ignore PE does not apply to residents in Scotland!


If you do get any correspondence from court then don't ignore that.

Hard_workers

Thankyou Quentin

beamerguy

Hard_workers wrote: »

The person who lost the case because they didn't notify the company it was in England.

ENGLAND NOT SCOTLAND

The interpretation of that case is probably incorrect, simply because there is no obligation to name the driver

Regardless we do not want Scottish readers to get confused by this.
In Scotland a PPC needs to establish who was the driver. PERIOD.

Hence the info on here about scotland

Hard_workers

Beamerguy and Quentin, because the companies have to prove who the driver was is it worth writing to them and say sorry but I wasn't the driver - to try and stop the letters? Or is that asking for trouble?

In the letters they say because you haven't contacted us we assume you to be the driver or because you haven't contacted us you are admitting liability.
That is why I'm concerned because in a way It's like agreeing with what they say by not denying it?

twhitehousescat

In the letters they say because you haven't contacted us we assume you to be the driver or because you haven't contacted us you are admitting liability.


they can SAY the sky is pink , but its not!

where in law is that written? must have missed it!!


scottish laws were simuklar to e/ni untill 2012 , but we had clamping as well , we kicket the clamping out and accepted POFa2102 , which said that if they followed the strict rules then YES the owner was guilty , but most have just chucked POFa out , because they are that thick they cannot do it


POFa never applied to scotland , and you do not need tosay who the driver was , or indeed reply to them

beamerguy

Hard_workers wrote: »

Beamerguy and Quentin, because the companies have to prove who the driver was is it worth writing to them and say sorry but I wasn't the driver - to try and stop the letters? Or is that asking for trouble?

In the letters they say because you haven't contacted us we assume you to be the driver or because you haven't contacted us you are admitting liability.
That is why I'm concerned because in a way It's like agreeing with what they say by not denying it?

This is the trash they send out.
Not for them to assume or presume and they know it.

In the middle ages they set fire to witches because
1: If they did not drown when dunked, they were guilty
2: If they drowned when dunked they were guilty.

Same as saying
"because you haven't contacted us you are admitting liability. "

UTTER SCAMMERS RUBBISH

Coupon-mad

Quentin wrote: »

Read the advice to residents of Scotland!

Indeed.

The OP only needed to search this forum for the word 'Scotland'. Hundreds of threads like this already.

Fruitcake

beamerguy wrote: »

This is the trash they send out.
Not for them to assume or presume and they know it.

In the middle ages they set fire to witches because
1: If they did not drown when dunked, they were guilty
2: If they drowned when dunked they were guilty.

Same as saying
"because you haven't contacted us you are admitting liability. "

UTTER SCAMMERS RUBBISH

Not in England. No alleged witches were ever burned to death in England, they were usually hanged. (I don't know what happened to alleged witches in Scotland because the POWA 1412 didn't apply.)

Today's trivia and useless information was brought to you by Fruity Enterprises Inc.

DoaM

Hard_workers wrote: »

Beamerguy and Quentin, because the companies have to prove who the driver was is it worth writing to them and say sorry but I wasn't the driver - to try and stop the letters? Or is that asking for trouble?

If DRP get someone corresponding with them then they'll know they have a fish dangling on the hook. Therefore they'll simply up the ante and continue the letters for longer.

No reply = DRP will give up earlier.