We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

New 2017 road tax rules

Options
24

Comments

  • abarthman
    abarthman Posts: 110 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    I purchased my car tax for the full year in November for £210.

    If I had bought just six month's in November, it would have cost me £110.25 and then it would have cost me another £70 (or thereabouts) in May 2017 for the next 6 months. Total for the year would be about £180.

    Paying 12 months' tax in advance has effectively cost me about £30 more than had I purchased it in two lots of 6 months.

    Does anyone know if people in my situation will receive any sort of refund or is it just tough luck?
  • DUTR
    DUTR Posts: 12,958 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    abarthman wrote: »
    I purchased my car tax for the full year in November for £210.

    If I had bought just six month's in November, it would have cost me £110.25 and then it would have cost me another £70 (or thereabouts) in May 2017 for the next 6 months. Total for the year would be about £180.

    Paying 12 months' tax in advance has effectively cost me about £30 more than had I purchased it in two lots of 6 months.

    Does anyone know if people in my situation will receive any sort of refund or is it just tough luck?

    It's for cars registered after March 2017.
  • abarthman
    abarthman Posts: 110 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    DUTR wrote: »
    It's for cars registered after March 2017.
    Ahh, right. Thanks.

    That's all right then.
  • Mobeer
    Mobeer Posts: 1,851 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Academoney Grad Photogenic
    edited 19 January 2017 at 10:19PM
    ikkie wrote: »
    [FONT=&quot]The road tax is changing from this April and it will shock you how much is going up....

    Some cars will be cheaper over time under the new system, for example the Ford Mustang or Nissan 370Z.
    e.g.

    Ford Mustang V8 = 299g/km

    Old system:
    First year = £1120
    Years 2-5 = 4 * £515
    Five year total = £3180

    New system
    First Year = £2000
    Years 2-5 = 4 * £140
    Five year total = £2560
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,658 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    It's also still Vehicle Excise Duty not Road Tax which hasn't existed since 1937 when Winston Churchill abolished it. While the new VED is mooted to be used for new strategic road building, whether it will be or not is debatable

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • VED or Road Tax, whats the difference.
    Renaming something doesn't change what it is, a device for taking a citizen's money.
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,837 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Nasqueron wrote: »
    It's also still Vehicle Excise Duty not Road Tax which hasn't existed since 1937 when Winston Churchill abolished it. While the new VED is mooted to be used for new strategic road building, whether it will be or not is debatable

    Since we're being pedantic, it has always been VED, but until 1937 it was paid into the "Road Fund". Churchhill (in 1926) abandoned the pretence of using the money on roads, but it wasn't formally abolished until 1937, by which time Churchhill was long out of government.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,658 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    VED or Road Tax, whats the difference.
    Renaming something doesn't change what it is, a device for taking a citizen's money.

    The issue is what it's there for. Road tax implies a tax on the use of the road, or a tax for the road but this doesn't happen at the moment.

    VED is used as a tax on pollution (in theory used to help combat the CO2 emissions) and currently goes to the government like VAT or any other tax to do what they want with it. The new fund is meant to be a tax for road use (or was when Osbourne launched the changes)

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,658 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Car_54 wrote: »
    Since we're being pedantic, it has always been VED, but until 1937 it was paid into the "Road Fund". Churchhill (in 1926) abandoned the pretence of using the money on roads, but it wasn't formally abolished until 1937, by which time Churchhill was long out of government.

    Yes and no. Yes it was always known as VED but at the time leading up to the abolishment it was known as The Road Fund, administered by the Road Board

    The Road Fund was killed by Churchill in 1926 but it wasn't actually abolished in 1937, that was just the year the money had run out of the fund

    Any which way, what we pay now (or have to register for in the case of the Band A cars) is nothing to do with road building or repair

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Rover_Driver
    Rover_Driver Posts: 1,520 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Part of the confusion is using the word 'Tax', to mean the Vehicle Excise Duty - which is a form of tax, and to mean a vehicle licence - which is not a form of tax.
    Even the .gov.uk website - Vehicle tax, Mot and insurance, is littered with the word 'tax', sometimes when it should be excise duty, and other times when it should be vehicle licence.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.