We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

ASBO advice!!!

1246

Comments

  • Fat_Walt
    Fat_Walt Posts: 750 Forumite
    Guest101 wrote: »
    What do you think internal means?.........


    What do you think it means?

    Being available to anyone with access to a national system isn't internal to Police Scotland.
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    Fat_Walt wrote: »
    What do you think it means?

    Being available to anyone with access to a national system isn't internal to Police Scotland.



    ... Amazing....
  • MrsTinks
    MrsTinks Posts: 15,238 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker Name Dropper
    It will be internal to anyone with access to the Police National Database... Not Joe Bloggs. Agree this is an "internal" marker. Police will also place them on vehicles if they have been reported as dangerous driving by members of the public. It's mainly an "oh this one may have been naughty before, if it's border line give it a tug will ya" marker.

    If you have one but you drive in accordane with the law etc then you'll never know about it. They can be put on cars for numerous reasons: public report, officer report, previous connection to crimes (ie if a prevous stop has led to drugs in the vehicle - common one for people to get pulled on when they've bought a second hand car... also easy to get removed once you know it's there and you prove you've bought the vehicle and no connection etc)

    OP - you could as easily have had an officer in a car with the appropriate equipment in the car and you could have had a lovely lot of points.

    More importantly - you were doing 95mph: take it from someone who deals with accidents as part of my job, 95mph makes a horrendous mess. All it takes is a blow out on an empty road, a bit of water or a car without it's lights (happens especially in winter...) and it all gets far more serious than a marker on the police database.
    DFW Nerd #025
    DFW no more! Officially debt free 2017 - now joining the MFW's! :)

    My DFW Diary - blah- mildly funny stuff about my journey
  • Fat_Walt
    Fat_Walt Posts: 750 Forumite
    MrsTinks wrote: »
    It will be internal to anyone with access to the Police National Database... Not Joe Bloggs. Agree this is an "internal" marker. Police will also place them on vehicles if they have been reported as dangerous driving by members of the public. It's mainly an "oh this one may have been naughty before, if it's border line give it a tug will ya" marker.

    If you have one but you drive in accordane with the law etc then you'll never know about it. They can be put on cars for numerous reasons: public report, officer report, previous connection to crimes (ie if a prevous stop has led to drugs in the vehicle - common one for people to get pulled on when they've bought a second hand car... also easy to get removed once you know it's there and you prove you've bought the vehicle and no connection etc)

    OP - you could as easily have had an officer in a car with the appropriate equipment in the car and you could have had a lovely lot of points.

    More importantly - you were doing 95mph: take it from someone who deals with accidents as part of my job, 95mph makes a horrendous mess. All it takes is a blow out on an empty road, a bit of water or a car without it's lights (happens especially in winter...) and it all gets far more serious than a marker on the police database.

    No they won't.
  • pogofish
    pogofish Posts: 10,853 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Fat_Walt wrote: »
    Can you evidence this or have you just made it up?

    Not in any detail that I'm willing to discuss here but yes.
  • Fat_Walt
    Fat_Walt Posts: 750 Forumite
    pogofish wrote: »
    Not in any detail that I'm willing to discuss here but yes.

    So it's something you've made up then.
  • pogofish
    pogofish Posts: 10,853 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Fat_Walt wrote: »
    So it's something you've made up then.

    The apology I once got from a a fairly senior officer suggests otherwise.
  • MrsTinks wrote: »
    It will be internal to anyone with access to the Police National Database... Not Joe Bloggs. Agree this is an "internal" marker. Police will also place them on vehicles if they have been reported as dangerous driving by members of the public. It's mainly an "oh this one may have been naughty before, if it's border line give it a tug will ya" marker.

    If you have one but you drive in accordane with the law etc then you'll never know about it. They can be put on cars for numerous reasons: public report, officer report, previous connection to crimes (ie if a prevous stop has led to drugs in the vehicle - common one for people to get pulled on when they've bought a second hand car... also easy to get removed once you know it's there and you prove you've bought the vehicle and no connection etc)

    OP - you could as easily have had an officer in a car with the appropriate equipment in the car and you could have had a lovely lot of points.

    More importantly - you were doing 95mph: take it from someone who deals with accidents as part of my job, 95mph makes a horrendous mess. All it takes is a blow out on an empty road, a bit of water or a car without it's lights (happens especially in winter...) and it all gets far more serious than a marker on the police database.

    Thanks for your reply. I've been accused of 95 in a 70. I wasn't actually doing 95.
  • Fat_Walt
    Fat_Walt Posts: 750 Forumite
    pogofish wrote: »
    The apology I once got from a a fairly senior officer suggests otherwise.


    If you say so.

    You can't add anything to back up your comment and there's no reason why something that's been dealt with cannot be discussed. Most forces would take the opposite view to what you originally posted but as you seem update on police discipline regs maybe you could educate us.
  • Fat_Walt
    Fat_Walt Posts: 750 Forumite
    Teenybop88 wrote: »
    Thanks for your reply. I've been accused of 95 in a 70. I wasn't actually doing 95.

    She's talking rubbish so I wouldn't listen to any of that.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.