ASBO advice!!!

2456

Comments

  • As the OP is in Scotland then it's possible for the police to issue an ASBO for motoring offences.
    If this has happened, they should receive notification through the post in the next coiple of weeks.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Fat_Walt wrote: »
    Section 59?
    This ^

    s59, Police Reform Act 2002.
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/30/section/59

    Also known as a vehicular ASBO. Think of it as a written warning. If you get a tug again in the next year, you may well have the vehicle seized.
  • AdrianC wrote: »
    This ^

    s59, Police Reform Act 2002.
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/30/section/59

    Also known as a vehicular ASBO. Think of it as a written warning. If you get a tug again in the next year, you may well have the vehicle seized.


    That only applies to England and Wales and not Scotland.
    This is the relevant law for Scotland:
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2004/8/section/126
  • Johno100
    Johno100 Posts: 5,259 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    That only applies to England and Wales and not Scotland.
    This is the relevant law for Scotland:
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2004/8/section/126

    I note just as Sec. 59 it refers to "a constable in uniform". The OP refers to a CID officer so I assume he was in plain clothes.

    But of course when the police are the judge, jury and issue the penalty trying to challenge it is nigh on impossible.
  • Teenybop88 wrote: »
    Yes he showed me his badge and used a radio to check my driving licence.

    I guess you mean warrant?
    I've close experience of "CID" fakers, just suspicious, that's all.
  • pogofish
    pogofish Posts: 10,853 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    MikeWhite wrote: »
    I guess you mean warrant?
    I've close experience of "CID" fakers, just suspicious, that's all.

    Not just fakers - You also get instances of genuine officers overstepping themselves. A police officer may technically be "on duty" all the time but most forces take a pretty dim view of officers who indulge in a bit of extra-curricular law enforcement unless its a genuine emergency.

    It might be worth a word with the duty inspector to ask if this guy was actually on duty or not at the time.
  • pogofish wrote: »
    Not just fakers - You also get instances of genuine officers overstepping themselves. A police officer may technically be "on duty" all the time but most forces take a pretty dim view of officers who indulge in a bit of extra-curricular law enforcement unless its a genuine emergency.

    It might be worth a word with the duty inspector to ask if this guy was actually on duty or not at the time.

    Can you evidence this or have you just made it up?
  • DoaM wrote: »
    You don't get an ASBO for motoring/traffic offences - at least I've never heard of such.

    You can get an ASBO for lots of things, it's not just something that's given to unruly teenagers, though it's unlikely to be given just for one instance of speeding on a Dual Caridgeway or Motorway (mention of 95mph in a 70 limit) Motoring wise I would imagine ASBOs would be given for repeatedly causing a nuisance after being warned, the usual boy racer stuff, wheelspinning, loud exhausts, loud music etc. Not for doing 95 in a 70 on an empty road, unless there's more to this than the op is telling us.
    I hate football and do wish people wouldn't keep talking about it like it's the most important thing in the world
  • You can get an ASBO for lots of things, it's not just something that's given to unruly teenagers, though it's unlikely to be given just for one instance of speeding on a Dual Caridgeway or Motorway (mention of 95mph in a 70 limit) Motoring wise I would imagine ASBOs would be given for repeatedly causing a nuisance after being warned, the usual boy racer stuff, wheelspinning, loud exhausts, loud music etc. Not for doing 95 in a 70 on an empty road, unless there's more to this than the op is telling us.

    Definitely nothing more to this. Empty road. 95 in a 70. He came from nowhere and followed me home.
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,762 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Section 59 specifically applies to driving which "contravenes section 3 or 34 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (c. 52) (careless and inconsiderate driving and prohibition of off-road driving),

    and is causing, or is likely to cause, alarm, distress or annoyance to members of the public,"

    It does not apply to speeding.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.