Fixed charge notice help please- Napier Parking

pappa_golf

this is napier parking who moved from the BPA to the IPC last yrear , this company tend to own the car parks

Bigjon1001

Hi Umkommas,
The parking company is Napier parking and the car park is in England. Sorry for the delay.

Bigjon1001

Hi fruitcake, the signs and terms and conditions on signs in car park advise that the PPC is a member of BPA and POPLA appeals apply .
However the NTK advise the PPC is a member of IPC and the IAS appeals apply.
Does this mean the signs are incorrect and give misleading information?

pappa_golf

midlands car parks are owned by the de savery family


https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/09341538/officers


funnily enough napier is also owned by ,,,


https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06009471/officers


keep it in the family


Moved from the British Parking Association scheme to the IPC on 01/03/2016.

https://bmpa.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/203628661-Napier-Parking-Ltd

Bigjon1001

Should the RK still use the template letter in newbies section on the last day of appeals process or do they grounds for appeal under "grace period" and incorrect signage?
Thank you again all
I have updated post title to include PPC trading name

Bigjon1001

Wow what a coincidence pappa golf

Umkomaas

Bigjon1001 wrote: »

Hi fruitcake, the signs and terms and conditions on signs in car park advise that the PPC is a member of BPA and POPLA appeals apply .
However the NTK advise the PPC is a member of IPC and the IAS appeals apply.
Does this mean the signs are incorrect and give misleading information?

Useful to have those photos (are they date/timestamped - if not get them taken with that info on them).

The signage is the only medium a contract is offered to you. If it's not correct then that will be a powerful argument.

Napier do occasionally chance their arm at court; more recently they have done so via Gladstones Solicitors (which isn't necessarily bad news as Gs are fouling up so many court cases, and they've taken no one to court from this forum where help has been provided with a defence).

https://bmpa.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/203628661-Napier-Parking-Ltd

http://www.bmpa.eu/companydata/Napier_Parking.html

But you're some way from this. You need to submit the initial appeal from the NEWBIES sticky, list #1, IPC version. Wait for the inevitable rejection.

Regulars might wish to muse on whether it might be worth an appeal to the IAS based on (contractual) signage showing Napier as being a BPA operator and (contractually) offering POPLA as the second stage appeal. After all, the IPC are on record in saying that all their AOS operators' signage is vetted and approved by them. Could be one of the few evidenced points that the IAS might find difficult to brush aside.

Interested in other regulars' views.

pappa_golf

no coincidence in the parking world , would you believe that the solicitors that they use also act as adjudicators for the IPC appeal system


ain,t seen nothing yet




however over the last few yrs napier have not done court , but under the IPC who knows?


evidently they (used) to be fair regarding appeals , try them with the truth and see what happens

pappa_golf

Umkomaas , correct how can the IPC have checked and approved the signage if it says BPA

Bigjon1001

Very useful info thanks all.