We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.

I want a new car!

Long time lurker here desperate for quick advice. We bought a brand new car in July (first time ever in 30 years of driving) and noticed various faults in the paintwork. To cut a long story short, after to-ing and fro-ing, the dealer's paint shop man said it WAS a fault and he found more. Later in the day the dealership phoned me back and said that rather than pass it through their warranty ( doesn't affect my warranty) they'll take it in as soon as possible and sand and paint it. It would take a long time through their warranty (this to me sounds dodgy).
My issue is that we bought a NEW car and would like a new car, not one that, effectively, has been fixed like one that has had an accident. Would I be within my rights to demand a new car?
Thanks
«1345

Comments

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    No, you would not.

    It is eminently reasonable for the supplier to repair the issue, whether it actually affect the fitness for purpose of the car, or merely be cosmetic (like this).

    On a side note, it's also very likely - probable, even - that the paint faults you're complaining about were caused by repairs before the car was delivered to you, so it's a repair to a repair. If the dealer was doing their job properly, these faults would have been rectified before delivery, too, and you'd have been none the wiser.
  • Ok. Thank you.
  • Strider590
    Strider590 Posts: 11,874 Forumite
    Most cars have been touched up or repaired before they enter the show room, this is effectively no different.
    “I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”

    <><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/
  • dannyrst
    dannyrst Posts: 1,519 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Strider590 wrote: »
    Most cars have been touched up or repaired before they enter the show room, this is effectively no different.

    Slightly different in that the car has been presented to the customer as ready to drive away, when clearly it isn't due to paint defects. Quality Control should be picking this sort of thing up. I'd expect something in return for the inconvenience.
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It depends how bad the paintwork is and to what extent. I'd argue that if the car needs a complete respray then I'd too be looking for a replacement and if I brought this to the attention of the dealer within 30 days I'd be well within my rights to reject the vehicle.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    neilmcl wrote: »
    ...and if I brought this to the attention of the dealer within 30 days I'd be well within my rights to reject the vehicle.
    The car was bought in July. There's no indication of timescales in the post other than that.
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    AdrianC wrote: »
    The car was bought in July. There's no indication of timescales in the post other than that.
    I'm well aware of that but we don't know how long this has been going on for.
  • Thanks for the replies.
    Other paintwork issues before the 30 days in which I could see splodges of 'grease' marks underneath the windows, the size of my fist. No amount of washing and polishing could remove them. Took it back to Nissan and they were shocked and booked it in for an inspection. After the inspection they told me that it was birds muck ( absolutely not and anyway the amount and size would suggest ostrich droppings!). And that it wouldn't have stained if I had supaguard!!!! And there was nothing they could do. Unfortunately for them I did pay extra for the supaguard and lo and behold the car was returned with the stains removed!
    However the other marks appeared after the 30 days because you can only see them when the sun hits the car at a certain angle. I have photos this time. Anyway yesterday they told me it was a fault in the paintwork and will sand and paint those areas. I am worried that there are other paint faults that I haven't seen yet (because of light conditions) and also I paid for a new car. It is damaged goods in my opinion. If I bought a dress with a fault then I would be given a new one; there wouldn't be an offer of a repair!
  • I am out for a couple of hours so will not be able to reply straight away.
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Let the fix the issues then take it to an independent car detailer and get them to check the condition of the paintwork.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.