We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

I will knock you out ! BBCs Jeremy Vine films woman driver`s shocking road rage

Options
11314161819

Comments

  • Norman_Castle
    Norman_Castle Posts: 11,871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 11 September 2016 at 1:12AM
    prowla wrote: »
    I'm not sure I quite understand your question, but rules 127-132 detail the rules regarding road markings, including broken lines, solid lines and hatched markings; they say when you may cross them into the other (oncoming) side of the road.
    The Highway Code was introduced in the 1930s when many roads didn't have road markings. Which rule in the Highway Code instructed road users not to drive on the right or in the centre of the road?
  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 13,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The Highway Code was introduced in the 1930s when many roads didn't have road markings. Which rule in the Highway Code instructed road users not to drive on the right or in the centre of the road?
    I've no idea - I wasn't driving in the 1930s and I've not read the HC of the 1930s.
  • prowla wrote: »
    I've no idea - I wasn't driving in the 1930s and I've not read the HC of the 1930s.
    Many current roads do not have road markings. Which rule in the Highway Code instructs road users not to drive on the right or in the centre of the road?
  • Sicard
    Sicard Posts: 865 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    jack_pott wrote: »
    I find that flicking the brake levers a few times with a loud click usually works, and doesn't feel quite so impatient.

    That's what they do in Amsterdam where pedestrians have to give way to cyclists anywhere.
    You know what uranium is, right? It's this thing called nuclear weapons. And other things. Like lots of things are done with uranium. Including some bad things.
    Donald Trump, Press Conference, February 16, 2017

  • brat
    brat Posts: 2,533 Forumite
    prowla wrote: »
    I've no idea - I wasn't driving in the 1930s and I've not read the HC of the 1930s.

    Prowla, the last time you revealed your interpretation of the "Keep Left" rule you said you were considering the IAM. Did you take that any further, and did you ask them about correct lane positioning?

    http://road.cc/content/news/17033-cyclists-take-prime-position-says-iam-book
    Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.
  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 13,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Many current roads do not have road markings. Which rule in the Highway Code instructs road users not to drive on the right or in the centre of the road?
    I know you're driving at something here...

    ...can you tell me what it is?
  • prowla wrote: »
    I know you're driving at something here...

    ...can you tell me what it is?
    :rotfl: You seem hesitant to suggest an answer. Could it be the keep left rule?

    https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Highway_Code_(1931)

    RULE OF THE ROAD. Vehicles.—Keep to the left (or near side) except when overtaking other vehicles or avoiding obstructions: when overtaking, overtake on the right (or off-side).

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/using-the-road-159-to-203

    Rule 160

    Once moving you should
    • keep to the left, unless road signs or markings indicate otherwise. The exceptions are when you want to overtake, turn right or pass parked vehicles or pedestrians in the road
  • mvgefb.jpg
  • Johno100
    Johno100 Posts: 5,259 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mvgefb.jpg

    A bit ironic, having such a sign blocking a cycle lane.:D

    That looks like Australia, isn't the use of cycle lanes mandatory in some States there?
  • esuhl wrote: »
    it would even be reasonable to ban cyclists on many trunk roads.

    Not unless they start marking cycle paths on road atlases, and not unless they signpost them with more than just a bicycle logo. A major reason for my not using cycle paths is that they can make navigation nigh on impossible.

    I sometimes use trunk roads for the same reason motorists do, to get from A to B quickly, a lot of cycle paths are routed on the assumption that avoiding traffic is the only criterion.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.